Advancing Chemistry by Enhancing Learning in the Laboratory (ACELL): a model for providing professional and personal development and facilitating improved student laboratory learning outcomes

The Advancing Chemistry by Enhancing Learning in the Laboratory (ACELL) project aims to improve the quality of learning in undergraduate laboratories through two interlocking mechanisms. The first is to build a database of experiments that are both chemically and educationally sound by testing them in a third-party laboratory, usually through an ACELL workshop involving both academic staff and students, to ensure that they work. The second mechanism provides personal and professional development for staff and students through a workshop process, and reinforced through on-going engagement with the ACELL community via the project website and experiment assessment and evaluation. The ACELL workshops include discussion of educational issues, both in abstract (through discussing laboratory learning in general) and concrete (through debriefing of each experiment tested) terms. This paper discusses the design of the ACELL project, and illustrates some of the successes of the staff and student personal and professional development aims. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2007, 8 (2), 232-254]

[1]  D. C. Phillips.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism , 1995 .

[2]  John W. Moore.  Let's Go for an A in Lab , 2006 .

[3]  Chad E. Stephens.  Taking Issue with "Chemistry Is Not a Laboratory Science" , 2005 .

[4]  Hans Niedderer,et al.  Teaching and learning in the science laboratory , 2003 .

[5]  Simon Barrie,et al.  The ACELL project: Student participation, professional development, and improving laboratory learning , 2006 .

[6]  Robert Bucat,et al.  PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AS A WAY FORWARD: APPLIED RESEARCH IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION , 2004 .

[7]  Mark A. Buntine,et al.  APCELL: Developing better ways of teaching in the laboratory , 2012 .

[8]  Pamela Joy Mulhall,et al.  What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? , 2000 .

[9]  Stephen J. Hawkes,et al.  Chemistry Is Not a Laboratory Science , 2004 .

[10]  Paul Marais,et al.  Are We Taking Symbolic Language for Granted , 2000 .

[11]  Donna L. Rigano,et al.  Students' thinking in a chemistry laboratory , 1994 .

[12]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  An information processing model of learning: Its application to an undergraduate laboratory course in chemistry , 1994 .

[13]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[14]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[15]  Tony Baker.  Chemistry: Laboratory Science or Not? , 2005 .

[16]  P. Wickman.  The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work , 2004 .

[17]  Peter G. Markow,et al.  Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: Students' perceptions and effects on achievement , 1998 .

[18]  D. Zimmaro,et al.  The Influence of Collaborative Learning on Student Attitudes and Performance in an Introductory Chemistry Laboratory , 2002 .

[19]  Gail Chittleborough,et al.  The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations , 2003 .

[20]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[21]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[22]  William J. Green,et al.  "Prompted" Inquiry-Based Learning in the Introductory Chemistry Laboratory , 2004 .

[23]  V. Minichiello,et al.  In-depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis , 2008 .

[24]  Judit N. Moschkovich,et al.  Integrating a Naturalistic Paradigm Into Research on Mathematics and Science Cognition and Learning , 2000 .

[25]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards A More Critical Approach To Practical Work In School Science , 1993 .

[26]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[27]  D. Andrich.  Relationships Between the Thurstone and Rasch Approaches to Item Scaling , 1978 .

[28]  L. J. Sacks.  Reaction to "Chemistry Is Not a Laboratory Science" , 2005 .

[29]  Elizabeth Hegarty-Hazel.  The Student laboratory and the science curriculum , 1990 .

[30]  A. Brew,et al.  Academic development through a negotiated curriculum , 1999 .

[31]  Hsin-Kai Wu,et al.  Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real‐life experiences: Intertextuality in a high‐school science classroom , 2003 .

[32]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[33]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[34]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  New stars for the teacher to steer by , 1984 .

[35]  M. Windschitl.  Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers , 2002 .

[36]  G. Bodner.  Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[37]  Mark A. Buntine,et al.  The Australian chemistry enhanced laboratory learning project , 2006 .

[38]  Eric Malina,et al.  Learning Chemistry in a Laboratory Environment , 2002 .

[39]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[40]  Kelly Morgan Deters,et al.  Student opinions regarding inquiry-based labs , 2005 .

[41]  Mark A. Buntine,et al.  APCELL: The Australian Physical Chemistry Enhanced Laboratory Learning Project , 2001 .

[42]  R. Kozma,et al.  The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning , 2000 .

[43]  Daniel S. Domin,et al.  A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles , 1999 .

[44]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Chemistry Teaching: Science or Alchemy?. , 1997 .

[45]  J. Michell.  Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms. , 1986 .

[46]  Mark A. Buntine,et al.  From APCELL to ACELL and beyond - expanding a multi-institution project for laboratory-based teaching and learning , 2007 .

[47]  Scott H. Kable,et al.  Educational analysis of the first year chemistry experiment ‘Thermodynamics Think-In’: an ACELL experiment , 2007 .

[48]  C. W. Bowen,et al.  Development and Score Validation of a Chemistry Laboratory Anxiety Instrument (Clai) for College Chemistry Students , 1999 .

[49]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories , 2005 .

[50]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .

[51]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[52]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research , 1982 .

[53]  Mike Watts,et al.  Teaching for quality learning in chemistry , 2005 .

[54]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[55]  David Boud,et al.  Teaching in Laboratories , 1986 .

[56]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  Mark A. Buntine,et al.  Achievements of an ACELL Workshop , 2006 .

[58]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[59]  A. Johnstone.  Chemistry Teaching - Science or Alchemy? 1996 Brasted Lecture , 1997 .

[60]  R. Burgess.  In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research , 1984 .

[61]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .