What predicts changes in useful field of view test performance?

The Useful Field of View Test (UFOV) has been used as an examination of age-related changes in visual processing and cognition and as an indicator of everyday performance outcomes, particularly driving, for over 20 years. How UFOV performance changes with age and what may impact such changes have not previously been investigated longitudinally. Predictors of change in UFOV performance over a 5-year period among control group participants (N=690) from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) study were examined. Random effects models were estimated with 4-subtest-total UFOV as the outcome and with baseline age, education, gender, race, visual acuity, depressive symptoms, mental status, and self-rated health, as well as attrition, as predictors. UFOV performance generally followed a curvilinear pattern, improving and then declining over time. Only increased age was consistently related to greater declines in UFOV performance over time. UFOV and Digit Symbol Substitution subtest, a standard measure of cognitive speed, had similar trajectories of change. The implications of these results are discussed.

[1]  Brian Brown,et al.  Clinical Vision Sciences , 1987 .

[2]  Matthew Rizzo,et al.  Impaired visual search in drivers with Parkinson's disease , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[3]  K. Anstey,et al.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal patterns of dedifferentiation in late-life cognitive and sensory function: the effects of age, ability, attrition, and occasion of measurement. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  C. Owsley,et al.  Relationship between visual sensitivity and target localization in older adults , 1995, Vision Research.

[5]  P. Atchley,et al.  The role of visual attention in predicting driving impairment in older adults. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[6]  F. Post,et al.  Behavior, aging and the nervous system , 1966 .

[7]  Karen Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Divided visual attention as a predictor of bumping while walking: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[9]  U. Lemke,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Memory Performance and Processing Speed in Old Age abstract Keywords , 2005 .

[10]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Simulated Car Crashes and Crash Predictors in Drivers With Alzheimer Disease , 1997 .

[11]  A. Baron,et al.  Improved digit symbol substitution by older women as a result of extended practice. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.

[12]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Vision, attention, and self-reported driving behaviors in community-dwelling stroke survivors. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Paige E. Scalf,et al.  The Neural Correlates of an Expanded Functional Field of View. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[14]  D. Roenker,et al.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  D. Roth,et al.  Relation of Useful Field of View and other Screening Tests to on-Road Driving Performance , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  M. Sloane,et al.  Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. , 1998, JAMA.

[18]  George W Rebok,et al.  Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  D L Roenker,et al.  The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance , 2005, Aging & mental health.

[20]  Karlene K. Ball,et al.  Transfer of a Speed of Processing Intervention to Near and Far Cognitive Functions , 2002, Gerontology.

[21]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[22]  G McGwin,et al.  Mobility Impairments in Crash-Involved Older Drivers , 2001, Journal of aging and health.

[23]  K. Warner Schaie,et al.  Perceptual speed in adulthood: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[24]  J N Morris,et al.  ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[25]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[26]  N. Pedersen,et al.  Age changes in processing speed as a leading indicator of cognitive aging. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[27]  C. Owsley,et al.  The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. , 1993, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[28]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Visual localization: age and practice. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  Karlene K. Ball,et al.  Speed-of-Processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[30]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent , 1996, Vision Research.

[31]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  AN AGE-DECREMENT IN THE ABILITY TO IGNORE IRRELEVANT INFORMATION. , 1965, Journal of gerontology.

[32]  David M. Smith,et al.  The ACTIVE cognitive training trial and health-related quality of life: protection that lasts for 5 years. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[33]  Lesley A Ross,et al.  The Impact of Speed of Processing Training on Cognitive and Everyday Functions. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[34]  C. Owsley,et al.  Association Between Visual Attention and Mobility in Older Adults , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[35]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[36]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Tasks: Relationship to Cognitive Function and Everyday Performance Assessments in Older Adults , 2002, Gerontology.

[37]  J. Duchek,et al.  Attention and driving performance in Alzheimer's disease. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[38]  K. Ball,et al.  Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. , 2006, JAMA.

[39]  Christina Wasylyshyn,et al.  Adult age and digit symbol substitution performance: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[40]  A F Sanders,et al.  Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[41]  J. Wood,et al.  Elderly Drivers and Simulated Visual Impairment , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  Fredric D Wolinsky,et al.  The effects of the ACTIVE cognitive training trial on clinically relevant declines in health-related quality of life. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[43]  Karlene K. Ball,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Useful Field of View Test Scores as Administered by Personal Computer , 2005, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[44]  V. Wadley,et al.  Sensory and Cognitive Factors Influencing Functional Ability in Older Adults , 2005, Gerontology.

[45]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Assessing functional status: exploring the relationship between the multiple sclerosis functional composite and driving. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  P. Bennett,et al.  Effects of aging on the useful field of view. , 2000, Experimental aging research.

[47]  Kathleen R. Bell,et al.  Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation: Preface , 2009 .

[48]  W J Hoyer,et al.  Adult age differences in visual search as a function of stimulus mapping and processing load. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.

[49]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Age-related slowing of digit symbol substitution revisited: what do longitudinal age changes reflect? , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[50]  Lisa Riolo,et al.  Attention Contributes to Functional Reach Test Scores in Older Adults with History of Falling , 2004 .

[51]  G. Geffen,et al.  Comparability, reliability, and practice effects on alternate forms of the Digit Symbol Substitution and Symbol Digit Modalities tests. , 2005, Psychological assessment.

[52]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[53]  Mark Mennemeier,et al.  Useful Field of View After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[54]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  The Life Space Questionnaire: A Measure of the Extent of Mobility of Older Adults , 1999 .

[55]  D. Roth,et al.  Useful Field of View and Other Neurocognitive Indicators of Crash Risk in Older Adults , 2004, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[56]  Ian Overington,et al.  The Occupational Visual Field , 1983 .

[57]  Gayla M. Cissell,et al.  Can High‐Risk Older Drivers Be Identified Through Performance‐Based Measures in a Department of Motor Vehicles Setting? , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[58]  L. Radloff.  The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[59]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Journals of Gerontology , 2001 .

[60]  Karlene K Ball,et al.  The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults. , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[61]  K. Ball,et al.  Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. , 1998, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[62]  P. Diggle,et al.  Practice and drop-out effects during a 17-year longitudinal study of cognitive aging. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[63]  Malcolm Man-Son-Hing,et al.  Predictors of Driving Ability Following Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[64]  David Salisbury,et al.  UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury , 2006, Brain injury.

[65]  T. Salthouse.  What do adult age differences in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test reflect? , 1992, Journal of gerontology.