Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective

Mammographic breast density has been established as an independent risk marker for developing breast cancer. Breast density assessment is a routine clinical need in breast cancer screening and current standard is using the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) criteria including four qualitative categories (i.e., fatty, scattered density, heterogeneously dense, or extremely dense). In each mammogram examination, a breast is typically imaged with two different views, i.e., the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view and cranial caudal (CC) view. The BI-RADS-based breast density assessment is a qualitative process made by visual observation of both the MLO and CC views by radiologists, where there is a notable inter- and intra-reader variability. In order to maintain consistency and accuracy in BI-RADS-based breast density assessment, gaining understanding on radiologists’ reading behaviors will be educational. In this study, we proposed to leverage the newly emerged deep learning approach to investigate how the MLO and CC view images of a mammogram examination may have been clinically used by radiologists in coming up with a BI-RADS density category. We implemented a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model, aimed at distinguishing the breast density categories using a large (15,415 images) set of real-world clinical mammogram images. Our results showed that the classification of density categories (in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) using MLO view images is significantly higher than that using the CC view. This indicates that most likely it is the MLO view that the radiologists have predominately used to determine the breast density BI-RADS categories. Our study holds a potential to further interpret radiologists’ reading characteristics, enhance personalized clinical training to radiologists, and ultimately reduce reader variations in breast density assessment.

[1]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Shandong Wu,et al.  Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk. , 2019, Medical physics.

[3]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Off-the-shelf convolutional neural network features for pulmonary nodule detection in computed tomography scans , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[4]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  A CNN Regression Approach for Real-Time 2D/3D Registration , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  D. Shen,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Deep Learning Architecture: Applications to Breast Lesions in US Images and Pulmonary Nodules in CT Scans , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[8]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[10]  J. Hopper,et al.  Mammographic density—a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[11]  Michael Berks,et al.  Prediction of reader estimates of mammographic density using convolutional neural networks , 2019, Journal of medical imaging.

[12]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  Chest pathology detection using deep learning with non-medical training , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[13]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[14]  S. Obenauer,et al.  Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification , 2005, European Radiology.

[15]  B. Keller,et al.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[16]  Sheida Nabavi,et al.  Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.