Late-Night Comedy in Election 2000: Its Influence on Candidate Trait Ratings and the Moderating Effects of Political Knowledge and Partisanship

This paper examines the effects of exposure to late-night comedy programming on trait ratings of the candidates in the 2000 Presidential election and the moderating effects of political knowledge and partisan- ship. The study includes a content analysis of late-night jokes, an analysis of the predictors of late-night exposure, and several tests of the relationship between late-night exposure and candidate trait ratings. Results did not reveal direct effects of late-night exposure on subjects' ratings of the candidates' caricatured traits, though findings did suggest differential effects of exposure to late-night as a function of the partisanship and political knowledge of the viewer.

[1]  R. Mcclure,et al.  The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national politics , 1976 .

[2]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[3]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[4]  R. Wyer,et al.  A theory of humor elicitation. , 1992, Psychological review.

[5]  Del Brinkman,et al.  Do Editorial Cartoons and Editorials Change Opinions? , 1968 .

[6]  R. Priest.  Election Jokes: The Effects of Reference Group Membership , 1966 .

[7]  J. Suls.  Chapter 4 – A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis , 1972 .

[8]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  The Impact of Traditional and Nontraditional Media Forms in the 1992 Presidential Election , 1996 .

[9]  Xinshu Zhao,et al.  Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992 , 1994 .

[10]  S. Chaffee,et al.  Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News , 1986 .

[11]  A. R. Williams,et al.  Memory for humorous cartoons , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[12]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Student solutions manual for Kleinbaum, Kupper, Muller and Nizam's Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods , 1998 .

[13]  Jaeho Cho,et al.  Communication Forms in U.S. Presidential Campaigns , 2001 .

[14]  Daniel G. McDonald,et al.  BEYOND SIMPLE EXPOSURE , 1985 .

[15]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[16]  Kathleen Hall Jamieson,et al.  The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists, and the Stories That Shape the Political World , 2002 .

[17]  S R Schmidt.  Effects of humor on sentence memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[19]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Another Look At the Agenda-Setting Function of the Press , 1974 .

[20]  S. Robert Lichter,et al.  The Political Content of Late Night Comedy , 2003 .

[21]  L. Gross,et al.  The “Mainstreaming” of America: Violence Profile No. 11 , 1980 .

[22]  Barry A. Hollander.  The New News and the 1992 Presidential Campaign: Perceived vs. Actual Political Knowledge , 1995 .

[23]  R. Weise.  Partisan perceptions of political humor , 1996 .

[24]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of chronically accessible constructs in person x situation effects on person perception: it's just a matter of time. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.