Model Development and Code Verification for Simulation of Electrodynamic Tether System

We develop a numerical model of an electrodynamic tether system composed of two finite end bodies and a flexible tether. The equations of motion of the system are presented along with two methods of discretizing the partial differential equations governing the tether vibrations. The first method is the assumed modes method in which the tether displacements are represented as series of generalized coordinates and assumed mode functions, and the second is a finite element method in which displacements and slopes at points along the tether are interpolated by shape functions. The method of manufactured solutions is used to verify that the computer codes written to simulate the system motion implement the discretization methods properly. Both the assumed modes method and the finite element method perform well for relatively low discretization levels; however, as the number of longitudinal assumed modes is increased, the mass matrix for the longitudinal vibrations becomes poorly conditioned, resulting in numerical errors that can cause the tether vibrations to improperly diverge. This behavior is not seen in the finite element method because the mass matrices for both the transverse and longitudinal vibrations are always well-conditioned.

[1]  P. Williams Optimal Orbital Transfer with Electrodynamic Tether , 2005 .

[2]  Vinod J. Modi,et al.  On the offset control of flexible nonautonomous tethered two-body systems , 1996 .

[3]  Mario L. Cosmo,et al.  Two-Bar Model for the Dynamics and Stability of Electrodynamic Tethers , 2002 .

[4]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Elements Of Vibration Analysis , 1986 .

[5]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  COMPARISON OF SIMPLE AND CHEBYCHEV POLYNOMIALS IN RAYLEIGH-RITZ ANALYSIS , 1994 .

[6]  E. C. Lorenzini,et al.  A New Kind of Dynamic Instability in Electrodynamic Tethers , 2000 .

[7]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and validation. , 2005 .

[8]  Claudio Bruno,et al.  SATELLITE DE-ORBITING BY MEANS OF ELECTRODYNAMIC TETHERS PART II: SYSTEM CONFIGURATION AND PERFORMANCE☆ , 2002 .

[9]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Review of code and solution verification procedures for computational simulation , 2005 .

[10]  Eugene M. Levin,et al.  Dynamic analysis of space tether missions , 2007 .

[11]  Haskan San,et al.  Orbital Maneuvering with Electrodynamic Tethers , 2003 .

[12]  Ethan A. Scarl,et al.  Space Station Reboost with Electrodynamic Tethers , 2000 .

[13]  K. Huebner The finite element method for engineers , 1975 .

[14]  R. Forward,et al.  Terminator Tether: A Spacecraft Deorbit Device , 2000 .

[15]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering , 1998 .

[16]  Luciano Iess,et al.  Linear Stability Analysis of Electrodynamic Tethers , 2005 .

[17]  Claudio Bruno,et al.  satellite de-orbiting by means of electrodynamic tethers part i: general concepts and requirements , 2002 .