of Talk: The changes in technology and market conditions have brought, in recent years, a significant evolution in the computer architectures. Multi-core chips force programmers to think parallel in any application domain, heterogeneous systems integrating different specialised processors are now the rule also in consumer markets, and energy efficiency is an issue across the entire computing spectrum from the wearable device to the high performance cluster. These trends pose significant issues: software development is a bottleneck because efficient programming for parallel and heterogeneous architectures is difficult, and application development remains a labour-intensive and expensive activity; non-deterministic timing in multicore chips poses a huge problem whenever a guaranteed response time is needed; software is typically not aware of the energy it uses, and therefore does not use hardware efficiently. Security is a cross-cutting problem, which in some cases is addressed through hardware-enforced "secure zones". This presentation discusses the recent evolution in computing architectures focusing on examples from European research and innovation projects, with a look forward to some promising innovations in the field like bio-inspired, probabilistic and approximate computing. Dr. Sandro D’Elia is Project Officer at the European Commission Unit A/3 "Complex Systems & Advanced Computing". He spent a significant part of his career as IT project manager, first in the private sector and then in the IT service of the European Commission. In 2009 he moved to a position of research project officer. His role is evaluating, negotiating, controlling and supporting research and innovation projects financed by the European Commission, contributing to the drafting of the research and innovation work programme, and contributing to European policies on software, cyber-physical systems and advanced computing. Prof. Dr. Roman Obermaisser, University of Siegen Architectures for Mixed-Criticality Systems Based on Networked Multi-Core Chips Abstract of Talk: Mixed-criticality architectures with support for modular certification make the integration of application subsystems with different safety assurance levels both technically and economically feasible. Strict segregation of these subsystems is a key requirement to avoid fault propagation and unintended side-effects due to integration. Also, mixed-criticality architectures must deal with the heterogeneity of subsystems that differ not only in their criticality, but also in the underlying computational models and the timing requirements. Non safety-critical subsystems often demand adaptability and support for dynamic system structures, while certification standards impose static configurations for safety-critical subsystems. Several aspects such as time and space partitioning, heterogeneous computational models and adaptability were individually addressed at different integration levels including distributed systems, the chip-level and software execution environments. However, a holistic architecture for the seamless mixed-criticality integration encompassing distributed systems, multi-core chips, operating systems and hypervisors is an open research problem. This presentation discusses the state-of-the-art of mixed-criticality systems and presents research challenges towards a hierarchical mixed-criticality platform with support for strict segregation of subsystems, heterogeneity and adaptability.of Talk: Mixed-criticality architectures with support for modular certification make the integration of application subsystems with different safety assurance levels both technically and economically feasible. Strict segregation of these subsystems is a key requirement to avoid fault propagation and unintended side-effects due to integration. Also, mixed-criticality architectures must deal with the heterogeneity of subsystems that differ not only in their criticality, but also in the underlying computational models and the timing requirements. Non safety-critical subsystems often demand adaptability and support for dynamic system structures, while certification standards impose static configurations for safety-critical subsystems. Several aspects such as time and space partitioning, heterogeneous computational models and adaptability were individually addressed at different integration levels including distributed systems, the chip-level and software execution environments. However, a holistic architecture for the seamless mixed-criticality integration encompassing distributed systems, multi-core chips, operating systems and hypervisors is an open research problem. This presentation discusses the state-of-the-art of mixed-criticality systems and presents research challenges towards a hierarchical mixed-criticality platform with support for strict segregation of subsystems, heterogeneity and adaptability. Prof. Dr. Roman Obermaisser is full professor at the Division for Embedded Systems at University of Siegen in Germany. He has studied computer sciences at Vienna University of Technology and received the Master’s degree in 2001. In February 2004, Roman Obermaisser has finished his doctoral studies in Computer Science with Prof. Hermann Kopetz at Vienna University of Technology as research advisor. In July 2009, Roman Obermaisser has received the habilitation ("Venia docendi") certificate for Technical Computer Science. His research work focuses on system architectures for distributed embedded real-time systems. He is the author of numerous conference and journal publications. He also wrote books on cross-domain system architectures for embedded systems, event-triggered and time-triggered control paradigms and time-triggered communication protocols. He has also participated in several EU research projects (e.g. DECOS, NextTTA, universAAL) and was the coordinator of the European research projects GENESYS and ACROSS. At present Roman Obermaisser coordinates the European research project DREAMS that will establish a mixed-criticality architecture for networked multi-core chips. Dr. Francisco Cazorla, Barcelona Supercomputing Center Time Predictability in High-Performance Mixed-Criticality Multicore Systems Abstract of Talk: While the search for high-performance will continue to be one of the main driving factors in computer design and development, there is an increasing need for time predictability across computing domains including high-performance (datacentre and supercomputers), handheld and embedded devices. The trend towards using computer systems to increasingly control essential aspects of human beings and the increasing connectivity across devices will naturally lead to situations in which applications partially executed in handheld and datacentre computers, directly connect with more embedded critical systems such as cars or medical devices. The problem lies in the fact that high-performance is usually achieved by deploying aggressive hardware features (speculation, caches, heterogeneous designs) that negatively impact time predictability. The challenge lies on finding hardware/software designs that balance high-performance and time-predictability as needed by the application environment. In this talk I will focus on the increasing needs of time predictability in computing systems. I will present some of the main challenges in the design of multicores and manycores, widely deployed in the different computer domains, to provide increasing degrees of time predictability without significantly degrading average performance. I will present the work done in my research group in two different directions to reach this goal, namely, probabilistic multicore systems and the analysis of COTS multicore processors.of Talk: While the search for high-performance will continue to be one of the main driving factors in computer design and development, there is an increasing need for time predictability across computing domains including high-performance (datacentre and supercomputers), handheld and embedded devices. The trend towards using computer systems to increasingly control essential aspects of human beings and the increasing connectivity across devices will naturally lead to situations in which applications partially executed in handheld and datacentre computers, directly connect with more embedded critical systems such as cars or medical devices. The problem lies in the fact that high-performance is usually achieved by deploying aggressive hardware features (speculation, caches, heterogeneous designs) that negatively impact time predictability. The challenge lies on finding hardware/software designs that balance high-performance and time-predictability as needed by the application environment. In this talk I will focus on the increasing needs of time predictability in computing systems. I will present some of the main challenges in the design of multicores and manycores, widely deployed in the different computer domains, to provide increasing degrees of time predictability without significantly degrading average performance. I will present the work done in my research group in two different directions to reach this goal, namely, probabilistic multicore systems and the analysis of COTS multicore processors. Dr. Francisco J. Cazorla is a researcher at the National Spanish Research Council (CSIC) and the leader of the CAOS research group (Computer Architecture Operating System) at the Barcelona Supercomputing Centre (www.bsc.es/ caos). His research area covers the design for both high-performance and real-time systems. He has led several research projects funded by industry including several processor vendor companies (IBM, Sun microsystems) and the European Space Agency. He has also participated in European FP6 (SARC) and FP7 Projects (MERASA, parMERASA). He led the FP7 PROARTIS project and currently leads the FP7 PROXIMA project. He has co-authored over 70 papers in international refereed
[1]
Gang Quan,et al.
Enhanced fixed-priority scheduling with (m,k)-firm guarantee
,
2000,
Proceedings 21st IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.
[2]
Duncan A. Campbell,et al.
Network Interactions and Performance of a Multifunction IEC 61850 Process Bus
,
2013,
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.
[3]
Charles E. Perkins,et al.
Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing
,
1999,
Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.
[4]
Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.
Overload Management in Real-Time Control Applications Using (m, k)-Firm Guarantee
,
1999,
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..
[5]
Jamal Hadi Salim,et al.
Beyond Softnet
,
2001,
Annual Linux Showcase & Conference.
[6]
Pascal Thubert,et al.
Objective Function Zero for the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)
,
2012,
RFC.
[7]
Francisco Vasques,et al.
(m,k)-firm pattern spinning to improve the GTS allocation of periodic messages in IEEE 802.15.4 networks
,
2013,
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.
[8]
C. D. Locke,et al.
Best-effort decision-making for real-time scheduling
,
1986
.
[9]
James W. Layland,et al.
Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment
,
1989,
JACM.
[10]
Julita Vassileva,et al.
Trust-Based Community Formation in Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Networks
,
2004,
IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04).
[11]
Benjamin Satzger,et al.
Towards Trustworthy Self-optimization for Distributed Systems
,
2009,
SEUS.
[12]
Anand Sivasubramaniam,et al.
Xen and co.: communication-aware CPU scheduling for consolidated xen-based hosting platforms
,
2007,
VEE '07.
[13]
Binoy Ravindran,et al.
On recent advances in time/utility function real-time scheduling and resource management
,
2005,
Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'05).
[14]
Thomas Noël,et al.
T-AAD: Lightweight traffic auto-adaptations for low-power MAC protocols
,
2014,
2014 13th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MED-HOC-NET).
[15]
Samarjit Chakraborty,et al.
Designing VM schedulers for embedded real-time applications
,
2011,
2011 Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE/ACM/IFIP International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS).
[16]
Weisong Shi,et al.
Design and Implementation of TARF: A Trust-Aware Routing Framework for WSNs
,
2012,
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.
[17]
Rami G. Melhem,et al.
An incremental approach to scheduling during overloads in real-time systems
,
2000,
Proceedings 21st IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium.
[18]
Daniel Mossé,et al.
Value-density algorithms to handle transient overloads in scheduling
,
1999,
Proceedings of 11th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems. Euromicro RTS'99.
[19]
Binoy Ravindran,et al.
Time-utility function-driven switched Ethernet: packet scheduling algorithm, implementation, and feasibility analysis
,
2004,
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.
[20]
Insup Lee,et al.
Real-time multi-core virtual machine scheduling in Xen
,
2014,
2014 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT).
[21]
Jorge Sá Silva,et al.
The GINSENG system for wireless monitoring and control: Design and deployment experiences
,
2013,
TOSN.
[22]
Siarhei Kuryla,et al.
RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks
,
2010
.
[23]
Jörg Hähner,et al.
Observation and Control of Organic Systems
,
2011,
Organic Computing.