Suppression of weeds by spring wheat Triticum aestivum increases with crop density and spatial uniformity

Summary 1. Recent advances in our understanding of the advantage of initial size in competition among individual plants (size-asymmetric competition) suggest that the potential for many crops to suppress weeds is much greater than generally appreciated. We hypothesize that this potential can be realized if: (i) the crop density is increased significantly and (ii) the crop is regularly (uniformly) distributed in two-dimensional space rather than sown in traditional rows. 2. We tested these hypotheses by sowing four varieties of spring wheat Triticum aestivum at three densities (200, 400 and 600 m ‐2 ) and in two spatial patterns (normal rows and a uniform grid pattern) in the presence of high weed pressure. 3. There were strong and significant effects of both crop density and spatial distribution on weed growth. Weed biomass decreased with crop density and was 30% lower in the grid pattern. 4. There was a negative linear relationship between above-ground weed biomass in early July and crop yield at harvest, so weed suppression translated directly into yield. The treatment with high crop density and the grid sowing pattern contained 60% less weed biomass and produced 60% higher yield than the treatment closest to normal sowing practices (crops sown in rows at 400 m ‐2 ).

[1]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants , 1998, Oecologia.

[2]  B. Verbeek,et al.  The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds , 1996 .

[3]  C. Swanton,et al.  Effect of Planting Patterns and Inter-row Cultivation on Competition Between Corn (Zea mays) and Late Emerging Weeds , 1996, Weed Science.

[4]  C. L. Mohler.  Ecological bases for the cultural control of annual weeds , 1996 .

[5]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1995 .

[6]  T. Michaels,et al.  Interaction of White Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars, Row Spacing, and Seeding Density with Annual Weeds , 1993, Weed Science.

[7]  N. Jordan.  Prospects for Weed Control Through Crop Interference. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  M. Westgate,et al.  Effect of row width on herbicide and cultivation requirements in row crops , 1992 .

[9]  Jeffrey A. Koscelny,et al.  Seeding Date, Seeding Rate, and Row Spacing Affect Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Cheat (Bromus secalinus) , 1991, Weed Technology.

[10]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Density Effects on the Size Structure of Annual Plant Populations: An Indication of Neighbourhood Competition , 1991 .

[11]  J. Weiner,et al.  Asymmetric competition in plant populations. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  D. Weeks,et al.  Interference of Three Annual Grasses with Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) , 1990, Weed Technology.

[13]  T. Miller,et al.  Local Density Variation may Mimic Effects of Asymmetric Competition on Plant Size Variability , 1989 .

[14]  D. L. Colvin,et al.  Comparison of Soybean (Glycine max) – Weed Interference from Large and Small Plots , 1988, Weed Science.

[15]  G. Buchanan,et al.  Influence of Row Spacing on Competitiveness and Yield of Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) , 1980, Weed Science.

[16]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  The role of spatial pattern in the competition between crop plants and weeds. a theoretical analysis , 1973 .

[17]  T. Oikawa,et al.  Structure of Foliage Canopies and Photosynthesis , 1973 .

[18]  L. M. Wax,et al.  Effect of Row Spacing on Weed Control in Soybeans , 1968, Weed Science.

[19]  C. L. Mohler,et al.  Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds: Enhancing the competitive ability of crops , 2001 .

[20]  M. Liebman,et al.  9 – Many Little Hammers: Ecological Management of Crop-Weed Interactions , 1997 .

[21]  S. Haakansson.  Competitive effects and competitiveness in annual plant stands, 1: Measurement methods and problems related to plant density. , 1997 .

[22]  H. Doll.  The Ability of Barley to Compete with Weeds , 1997 .

[23]  C. Ballaré,et al.  3 – Light Gaps: Sensing the Light Opportunities in Highly Dynamic Canopy Environments , 1994 .

[24]  H. Kroon,et al.  Foraging in Plants: the Role of Morphological Plasticity in Resource Acquisition , 1994 .

[25]  T. Welacky,et al.  Row-spacing and seed-rate effects on winter wheat in Ontario , 1993 .

[26]  J. Grace.  On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. , 1990 .

[27]  B. Cullis,et al.  Prediction of wheat yield loss due to competition by wild oats (Avena spp.) , 1987 .

[28]  J. Bleasdale.  Plant Physiology in Relation to Horticulture , 1977 .

[29]  L. Erviö.  Growth of weeds in cereal populations , 1972 .