Mechanical Durotactic Environment Enhances Specific Glioblastoma Cell Responses

Background: A hallmark of glioblastoma is represented by their ability to widely disperse throughout the brain parenchyma. The importance of developing new anti-migratory targets is critical to reduce recurrence and improve therapeutic efficacy. Methods: Polydimethylsiloxane substrates, either mechanically uniform or presenting durotactic cues, were fabricated to assess GBM cell morphological and dynamical response with and without pharmacological inhibition of NNMII contractility, of its upstream regulator ROCK and actin polymerization. Results: Glioma cells mechanotactic efficiency varied depending on the rigidity compliance of substrates. Morphologically, glioma cells on highly rigid and soft bulk substrates displayed bigger and elongated aggregates whereas on durotactic substrates the same cells were homogeneously dispersed with a less elongated morphology. The durotactic cues also induced a motility change, cell phenotype dependent, and with cells being more invasive on stiffer substrates. Pharmacological inhibition of myosin or ROCK revealed a rigidity-insensitivity, unlike inhibition of microfilament contraction and polymerization of F-actin, suggesting that alternative signalling is used to respond to durotactic cues. Conclusions: The presence of a distinct mechanical cue is an important factor in cell migration. Together, our results provide support for a durotactic role of glioma cells that acts through actomyosin contractility to regulate the aggressive properties of GBM cells.

[1]  T. Lindahl,et al.  Static platelet adhesion, flow cytometry and serum TXB2 levels for monitoring platelet inhibiting treatment with ASA and clopidogrel in coronary artery disease: a randomised cross-over study , 2009, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[2]  P. Ratano,et al.  Time-lapse Whole-field Fluorescence Imaging of Microglia ProcessesMotility in Acute Mouse Hippocampal Slices and Analysis. , 2019, Bio-protocol.

[3]  Ingerid Reinertsen,et al.  The Direction of Tumour Growth in Glioblastoma Patients , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[4]  P. Janmey,et al.  Soft Substrates Containing Hyaluronan Mimic the Effects of Increased Stiffness on Morphology, Motility, and Proliferation of Glioma Cells. , 2017, Biomacromolecules.

[5]  Giuseppe Antonacci,et al.  Biomechanics of subcellular structures by non-invasive Brillouin microscopy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  B. Fabry,et al.  Differential response of patient-derived primary glioblastoma cells to environmental stiffness , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  B. Cortese,et al.  Mechanical guidance of cell migration , 2016 .

[8]  Jung-ming G. Lin,et al.  Constitutive activation of myosin-dependent contractility sensitizes glioma tumor-initiating cells to mechanical inputs and reduces tissue invasion. , 2015, Cancer research.

[9]  Jan Brábek,et al.  Mechanosensors in integrin signaling: the emerging role of p130Cas. , 2014, European journal of cell biology.

[10]  C. Klämbt,et al.  ECM stiffness regulates glial migration in Drosophila and mammalian glioma models , 2014, Development.

[11]  M. Sabel,et al.  Glioblastoma multiforme metastasis outside the CNS: three case reports and possible mechanisms of escape. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Alexis Gautreau,et al.  Quantitative and unbiased analysis of directional persistence in cell migration , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[13]  Alexa Kiss,et al.  Nuclear Motility in Glioma Cells Reveals a Cell-Line Dependent Role of Various Cytoskeletal Components , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  K. Hahn,et al.  The regulation of RhoA at focal adhesions by StarD13 is important for astrocytoma cell motility. , 2014, Experimental cell research.

[15]  J. Martinez-Climent,et al.  Cellular Plasticity Confers Migratory and Invasive Advantages to a Population of Glioblastoma‐Initiating Cells that Infiltrate Peritumoral Tissue , 2013, Stem cells.

[16]  Sergey V. Plotnikov,et al.  Force Fluctuations within Focal Adhesions Mediate ECM-Rigidity Sensing to Guide Directed Cell Migration , 2012, Cell.

[17]  G. Gigli,et al.  Modulation of alignment and differentiation of skeletal myoblasts by biomimetic materials. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[18]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Dirk Troost,et al.  Addressing diffuse glioma as a systemic brain disease with single-cell analysis. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[20]  Christopher Beadle,et al.  Direct inhibition of myosin II effectively blocks glioma invasion in the presence of multiple motogens , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  E. Sahai,et al.  In vivo fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging reveals differential activation of Rho-family GTPases in glioblastoma cell invasion , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  G. Gigli,et al.  Cell self-patterning on uniform PDMS-surfaces with controlled mechanical cues. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[23]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[24]  V. Weaver,et al.  In situ force mapping of mammary gland transformation. , 2011, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[25]  B. Geiger,et al.  Actomyosin-generated tension controls the molecular kinetics of focal adhesions , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[26]  P. Beauchesne Extra-Neural Metastases of Malignant Gliomas: Myth or Reality? , 2011, Cancers.

[27]  M. Schwartz Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[28]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Contractility Dominates Adhesive Ligand Density in Regulating Cellular De-adhesion and Retraction Kinetics , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Daniel Gioeli,et al.  Matrix Rigidity Regulates Cancer Cell Growth and Cellular Phenotype , 2010, PloS one.

[30]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Giuseppe Gigli,et al.  Mechanical Gradient Cues for Guided Cell Motility and Control of Cell Behavior on Uniform Substrates , 2009 .

[32]  Jochen Herms,et al.  Imaging glioma cell invasion in vivo reveals mechanisms of dissemination and peritumoral angiogenesis , 2009, Glia.

[33]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.

[34]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Contractile forces in tumor cell migration. , 2008, European journal of cell biology.

[35]  Christopher Beadle,et al.  The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[36]  M. Olson Applications for ROCK kinase inhibition. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[37]  T. Maehama,et al.  S1P(2) receptors mediate inhibition of glioma cell migration through Rho signaling pathways independent of PTEN. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[38]  R. Adelstein,et al.  Nonmuscle myosin II moves in new directions , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[39]  Barclay Morrison,et al.  Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[40]  E. Fama,et al.  Migration , 2007, Inward Looking.

[41]  G. Kirfel,et al.  ROCK signaling mediates the adoption of different modes of migration and invasion in human mammary epithelial tumor cells. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[42]  Peter Canoll,et al.  Transplanted glioma cells migrate and proliferate on host brain vasculature: A dynamic analysis , 2006, Glia.

[43]  V. Tse,et al.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a review of natural history and management options. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[44]  T. B. Müller,et al.  Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[45]  Philip P. LeDuc,et al.  Nanoscale Intracellular Organization and Functional Architecture Mediating Cellular Behavior , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  W. Kolch Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[47]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[48]  R. Kiss,et al.  Possible future issues in the treatment of glioblastomas: special emphasis on cell migration and the resistance of migrating glioblastoma cells to apoptosis. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[49]  Daniel J Brat,et al.  Microregional extracellular matrix heterogeneity in brain modulates glioma cell invasion. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[50]  L. Addadi,et al.  Hierarchical assembly of cell-matrix adhesion complexes. , 2004, Biochemical Society transactions.

[51]  M. Westphal,et al.  Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  H. Kleinman,et al.  Pericytic-Like Angiotropism of Glioma and Melanoma Cells , 2002, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[53]  Bert Grobben,et al.  Rat C6 glioma as experimental model system for the study of glioblastoma growth and invasion , 2002, Cell and Tissue Research.

[54]  D. Gingras,et al.  Rapid activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 by glioma cells occurs through a posttranslational MT1-MMP-dependent mechanism. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[55]  E. Holland,et al.  Glioblastoma multiforme: the terminator. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  R. Amirnovin,et al.  Vascular Apoptosis and Involution in Gliomas Precede Neovascularization: A Novel Concept for Glioma Growth and Angiogenesis , 2000, Laboratory Investigation.

[57]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Vessel cooption, regression, and growth in tumors mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. , 1999, Science.

[58]  Raymond Sawaya,et al.  Induction of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Requires a Polymerized Actin Cytoskeleton in Human Malignant Glioma Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  R L Juliano,et al.  Integrin signaling and cell growth control. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[60]  T. Hunter,et al.  Integrin-mediated signal transduction linked to Ras pathway by GRB2 binding to focal adhesion kinase , 1994, Nature.

[61]  Richard O. Hynes,et al.  Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion , 1992, Cell.

[62]  Stuart K. Williams,et al.  Migration of individual microvessel endothelial cells: stochastic model and parameter measurement. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[63]  H. Scherer Structural Development in Gliomas , 1938 .

[64]  M. Aoyagi,et al.  Invasion of experimental rat brain tumor: early morphological changes following microinjection of C6 glioma cells , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[65]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.