Modeling the smoky troposphere of the southeast Atlantic: a comparison to ORACLES airborne observations from September of 2016

Abstract. In the southeast Atlantic, well-defined smoke plumes from Africa advect over marine boundary layer cloud decks; both are most extensive around September, when most of the smoke resides in the free troposphere. A framework is put forth for evaluating the performance of a range of global and regional atmospheric composition models against observations made during the NASA ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) airborne mission in September 2016. A strength of the comparison is a focus on the spatial distribution of a wider range of aerosol composition and optical properties than has been done previously. The sparse airborne observations are aggregated into approximately 2∘ grid boxes and into three vertical layers: 3–6 km, the layer from cloud top to 3 km, and the cloud-topped marine boundary layer. Simulated aerosol extensive properties suggest that the flight-day observations are reasonably representative of the regional monthly average, with systematic deviations of 30 % or less. Evaluation against observations indicates that all models have strengths and weaknesses, and there is no single model that is superior to all the others in all metrics evaluated. Whereas all six models typically place the top of the smoke layer within 0–500 m of the airborne lidar observations, the models tend to place the smoke layer bottom 300–1400 m lower than the observations. A spatial pattern emerges, in which most models underestimate the mean of most smoke quantities (black carbon, extinction, carbon monoxide) on the diagonal corridor between 16∘ S, 6∘ E, and 10∘ S, 0∘ E, in the 3–6 km layer, and overestimate them further south, closer to the coast, where less aerosol is present. Model representations of the above-cloud aerosol optical depth differ more widely. Most models overestimate the organic aerosol mass concentrations relative to those of black carbon, and with less skill, indicating model uncertainties in secondary organic aerosol processes. Regional-mean free-tropospheric model ambient single scattering albedos vary widely, between 0.83 and 0.93 compared with in situ dry measurements centered at 0.86, despite minimal impact of humidification on particulate scattering. The modeled ratios of the particulate extinction to the sum of the black carbon and organic aerosol mass concentrations (a mass extinction efficiency proxy) are typically too low and vary too little spatially, with significant inter-model differences. Most models overestimate the carbonaceous mass within the offshore boundary layer. Overall, the diversity in the model biases suggests that different model processes are responsible. The wide range of model optical properties requires further scrutiny because of their importance for radiative effect estimates.

[1]  C. Flynn,et al.  An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin , 2021 .

[2]  C. Flynn,et al.  An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the Southeast Atlantic basin , 2020 .

[3]  P. Formenti,et al.  Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) and its sensitivity to absorbing properties: a regional climate modeling study , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  J. Haywood,et al.  Absorption closure in highly aged biomass burning smoke , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[5]  B. Cairns,et al.  Mid-level clouds are frequent above the southeast Atlantic stratocumulus clouds , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[6]  J. Haywood,et al.  Vertical variability of the properties of highly aged biomass burning aerosol transported over the southeast Atlantic during CLARIFY-2017 , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[7]  P. Colarco,et al.  The Influence of Elevated Smoke Layers on Stratocumulus Clouds Over the SE Atlantic in the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Model , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[8]  D. Westervelt,et al.  A La Niña‐Like Climate Response to South African Biomass Burning Aerosol in CESM Simulations , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[9]  P. Colarco,et al.  Apparent dust size discrepancy in aerosol reanalysis in north African dust after long-range transport , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[10]  C. Flynn,et al.  Above-cloud aerosol optical depth from airborne observations in the southeast Atlantic , 2020 .

[11]  N. Bellouin,et al.  Diurnal cycle of the semi-direct effect from a persistent absorbing aerosol layer over marine stratocumulus in large-eddy simulations , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[12]  Jian Sun,et al.  Aerosols in the E3SM Version 1: New Developments and Their Impacts on Radiative Forcing , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[13]  P. Formenti,et al.  Evidence of the complexity of aerosol transport in the lower troposphere on the Namibian coast during AEROCLO-sA , 2019 .

[14]  M. Chin,et al.  Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model , 2019 .

[15]  M. Dubey,et al.  Mie Scattering Captures Observed Optical Properties of Ambient Biomass Burning Plumes Assuming Uniform Black, Brown, and Organic Carbon Mixtures , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[16]  L. G. Tilstra,et al.  Aerosol direct radiative effect over clouds from a synergy of Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectances , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[17]  M. Chin,et al.  Supplementary material to "Characterization of Organic Aerosol across the Global Remote Troposphere: A comparison of ATom measurements and global chemistry models" , 2019 .

[18]  S. Howell,et al.  Biomass burning aerosol as a modulator of the droplet number in the southeast Atlantic region , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[19]  C. S. Zender,et al.  An Overview of the Atmospheric Component of the Energy Exascale Earth System Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[20]  P. Formenti,et al.  The Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in Southern Africa Field Campaign in Namibia: Overview, Illustrative Observations, and Way Forward , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[21]  C. Flynn,et al.  Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016 , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[22]  M. Andreae Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[23]  M. Vaughan,et al.  Cloud Aerosol Transport System (CATS) 1064 nm Calibration and Validation. , 2019, Atmospheric measurement techniques.

[24]  C. Flynn,et al.  Above-cloud aerosol radiative effects based on ORACLES 2016 and ORACLES 2017 aircraft experiments , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[25]  M. Chin,et al.  Observationally constrained analysis of sea salt aerosol in the marine atmosphere , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[26]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[27]  C. Flynn,et al.  Intercomparison of biomass burning aerosol optical properties from in-situ and remote-sensing instruments in ORACLES-2016 , 2019 .

[28]  B. Samset,et al.  Strong Contrast in Remote Black Carbon Aerosol Loadings Between the Atlantic and Pacific Basins , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[29]  P. Formenti,et al.  Simulation of the transport, vertical distribution, optical properties and radiative impact of smoke aerosols with the ALADIN regional climate model during the ORACLES-2016 and LASIC experiments , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[30]  S. Howell,et al.  Time-dependent entrainment of smoke presents an observational challenge for assessing aerosol–cloud interactions over the southeast Atlantic Ocean , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[31]  R. Neale,et al.  Understanding Cloud and Convective Characteristics in Version 1 of the E3SM Atmosphere Model , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[32]  P. Saide,et al.  Calibration of a high spectral resolution lidar using a Michelson interferometer, with data examples from ORACLES. , 2018, Applied optics.

[33]  L. Lee,et al.  Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[34]  P. Field,et al.  Large simulated radiative effects of smoke in the south-east Atlantic , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[35]  C. Flynn,et al.  The Ascension Island Boundary Layer in the Remote Southeast Atlantic is Often Smoky , 2018 .

[36]  P. Zuidema,et al.  Low Cloud Cover Sensitivity to Biomass-Burning Aerosols and Meteorology over the Southeast Atlantic , 2018 .

[37]  J. Penner,et al.  Biomass smoke from southern Africa can significantly enhance the brightness of stratocumulus over the southeastern Atlantic Ocean , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Jiwen Fan,et al.  Fine-scale application of WRF-CAM5 during a dust storm episode over East Asia: Sensitivity to grid resolutions and aerosol activation parameterizations , 2018 .

[39]  Véronique Ducrocq,et al.  SURFEX v8.0 interface with OASIS3-MCT to couple atmosphere with hydrology, ocean, waves and sea-ice models, from coastal to global scales , 2017 .

[40]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  CLUBB-SILHS: A parameterization of subgrid variability in the atmosphere , 2017, 1711.03675.

[41]  Wen Xiao,et al.  Performance of Three MODIS Fire Products (MCD45A1, MCD64A1, MCD14ML), and ESA Fire_CCI in a Mountainous Area of Northwest Yunnan, China, Characterized by Frequent Small Fires , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[42]  R. Leung,et al.  Evaluation of a multi-scale WRF-CAM5 simulation during the 2010 East Asian Summer Monsoon , 2017 .

[43]  M. Chin,et al.  Refined Use of Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth Snapshots to Constrain Biomass Burning Emissions in the GOCART Model , 2017 .

[44]  G. Mann,et al.  The Global Aerosol Synthesis and Science Project (GASSP): Measurements and Modeling to Reduce Uncertainty , 2017 .

[45]  Kebin He,et al.  Multi-year application of WRF-CAM5 over East Asia-Part I: Comprehensive evaluation and formation regimes of O 3 and PM 2.5 , 2017 .

[46]  C. Flynn,et al.  The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 - onward, Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation. , 2017, Journal of climate.

[47]  Yugo Kanaya,et al.  Size-dependent validation of MODIS MCD64A1 burned area over six vegetation types in boreal Eurasia: Large underestimation in croplands , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[48]  M. Chin,et al.  Biomass burning aerosol transport and vertical distribution over the South African‐Atlantic region , 2017 .

[49]  Edward Charles Fortner,et al.  Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications , 2017 .

[50]  D. Winker,et al.  Seasonally transported aerosol layers over southeast Atlantic are closer to underlying clouds than previously reported , 2017, Geophysical research letters.

[51]  Otto P. Hasekamp,et al.  Direct radiative effect of aerosols based on PARASOL and OMI satellite observations , 2017 .

[52]  P. Formenti,et al.  Smoke and Clouds above the Southeast Atlantic: Upcoming Field Campaigns Probe Absorbing Aerosol’s Impact on Climate , 2016 .

[53]  P. Zuidema,et al.  The role of the southern African easterly jet in modifying the southeast Atlantic aerosol and cloud environments , 2016 .

[54]  S. Ghan,et al.  Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model , 2015 .

[55]  L. Leung,et al.  Application of an Online-Coupled Regional Climate Model, WRF-CAM5, over East Asia for Examination of Ice Nucleation Schemes: Part II. Sensitivity to Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation Parameterizations and Dust Emissions , 2015 .

[56]  R. Koster,et al.  The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED): Documentation of Versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4. Volume 38; Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation , 2015 .

[57]  L. Leung,et al.  Application of an Online-Coupled Regional Climate Model, WRF-CAM5, over East Asia for Examination of Ice Nucleation Schemes: Part I. Comprehensive Model Evaluation and Trend Analysis for 2006 and 2011 , 2015, Climate.

[58]  Jiwen Fan,et al.  Incorporating an advanced aerosol activation parameterization into WRF‐CAM5: Model evaluation and parameterization intercomparison , 2015 .

[59]  P. Zuidema,et al.  The Convolution of Dynamics and Moisture with the Presence of Shortwave Absorbing Aerosols over the Southeast Atlantic , 2015 .

[60]  J. Kar,et al.  Evaluation of CALIOP 532 nm aerosol optical depth over opaque water clouds , 2015 .

[61]  L. G. Tilstra,et al.  Aerosol direct radiative effect of smoke over clouds over the southeast Atlantic Ocean from 2006 to 2009 , 2014 .

[62]  D. Tanré,et al.  Absorption of aerosols above clouds from POLDER/PARASOL measurements and estimation of their direct radiative effect , 2014 .

[63]  C. Frantzidis,et al.  Response to Reviewers Reviewer #1 , 2010 .

[64]  G. Mann,et al.  Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity , 2014 .

[65]  S. Ghan,et al.  Assessing the CAM5 physics suite in the WRF-Chem model: implementation, resolution sensitivity, and a first evaluation for a regional case study , 2014 .

[66]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Global and regional modeling of clouds and aerosols in the marine boundary layer during VOCALS: the VOCA intercomparison , 2014 .

[67]  Xiaoliang Song,et al.  Investigation of aerosol indirect effects using a cumulus microphysics parameterization in a regional climate model , 2014 .

[68]  Qiaoqiao Wang,et al.  Global budget and radiative forcing of black carbon aerosol: Constraints from pole‐to‐pole (HIPPO) observations across the Pacific , 2014 .

[69]  D. Tanré,et al.  Global analysis of aerosol properties above clouds , 2013 .

[70]  C. Ichoku,et al.  Global top-down smoke aerosol emissions estimation using satellite fire radiative power measurements , 2013 .

[71]  Stephen E. Dunagan,et al.  Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research (4STAR): Instrument Technology , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[72]  R. Lucchesi,et al.  File Specification for GEOS-5 FP-IT (Forward Processing for Instrument Teams) , 2013 .

[73]  M. Chin,et al.  Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study , 2012 .

[74]  Sonia M. Kreidenweis,et al.  A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity – Part 3: Including surfactant partitioning , 2012 .

[75]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations , 2012 .

[76]  Richard Neale,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .

[77]  R. Subramanian,et al.  Effective density of Aquadag and fullerene soot black carbon reference materials used for SP2 calibration , 2011 .

[78]  Qiaoqiao Wang,et al.  Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing , 2011 .

[79]  R. Hogan,et al.  The vertical cloud structure of the West African monsoon: A 4 year climatology using CloudSat and CALIPSO , 2011 .

[80]  R. Ferrare,et al.  Aerosol classification using airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar measurements – methodology and examples , 2011 .

[81]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Absorbing aerosol in the troposphere of the Western Arctic during the 2008 ARCTAS/ARCPAC airborne field campaigns , 2011 .

[82]  Eric M. Wilcox,et al.  Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of smoke aerosols over clouds , 2011 .

[83]  P. Rasch,et al.  Direct and semidirect aerosol effects of southern African biomass burning aerosol , 2011 .

[84]  S. Howell,et al.  Organic matter and non-refractory aerosol over the remote Southeast Pacific: oceanic and combustion sources , 2011 .

[85]  B. Holben,et al.  An Accuracy Assessment of the CALIOP/CALIPSO Version 2/Version 3 Daytime Aerosol Extinction Product Based on a Detailed Multi-Sensor, Multi-Platform Case Study , 2011 .

[86]  Xiaoliang Song,et al.  Microphysics parameterization for convective clouds in a global climate model: Description and single‐column model tests , 2011 .

[87]  Becky Alexander,et al.  Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations , 2010 .

[88]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model , 2010 .

[89]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The VAMOS Ocean-Cloud-Atmosphere-Land Study Regional Experiment (VOCALS-REx): goals, platforms, and field operations , 2010 .

[90]  M. Chin,et al.  Online simulations of global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS‐4 model and comparisons to satellite and ground‐based aerosol optical depth , 2010 .

[91]  D. Jacob,et al.  Synthesis of satellite (MODIS), aircraft (ICARTT), and surface (IMPROVE, EPA‐AQS, AERONET) aerosol observations over eastern North America to improve MODIS aerosol retrievals and constrain surface aerosol concentrations and sources , 2010 .

[92]  A. Virkkula Correction of the Calibration of the 3-wavelength Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (3λ PSAP) , 2010 .

[93]  M. Dubey,et al.  The Detection Efficiency of the Single Particle Soot Photometer , 2010 .

[94]  D. R. Worsnop,et al.  Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere , 2009, Science.

[95]  M. Chin,et al.  Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models , 2009 .

[96]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The PreVOCA experiment: Modeling the Lower Troposphere in the Southeast Pacific , 2009 .

[97]  R. Ferrare,et al.  NASA LaRC airborne high spectral resolution lidar aerosol measurements during MILAGRO: observations and validation , 2009 .

[98]  C. Bretherton,et al.  A New Moist Turbulence Parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[99]  Robert Wood,et al.  Satellite-derived direct radiative effect of aerosols dependent on cloud cover , 2009 .

[100]  Wayne C. Welch,et al.  Airborne high spectral resolution lidar for profiling aerosol optical properties. , 2008, Applied optics.

[101]  Ricardo Todling,et al.  The GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System-Documentation of Versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0 , 2008 .

[102]  Cyril J. Morcrette,et al.  PC2: A prognostic cloud fraction and condensation scheme. I: Scheme description , 2008 .

[103]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[104]  Louisa Emmons,et al.  © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry measurements above , 2008 .

[105]  A. Nenes,et al.  Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in large‐scale models: Including effects of entrainment , 2007 .

[106]  G. Grell,et al.  Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model , 2006 .

[107]  Nobuo Sugimoto,et al.  Characteristics of dust aerosols inferred from lidar depolarization measurements at two wavelengths. , 2006, Applied optics.

[108]  M. Petters,et al.  A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity , 2006 .

[109]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Single‐particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light‐scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere , 2006 .

[110]  S. Howell,et al.  Results from the DC-8 Inlet Characterization Experiment (DICE): Airborne Versus Surface Sampling of Mineral Dust and Sea Salt Aerosols , 2005 .

[111]  Anthony O'Keefe,et al.  Cavity-enhanced quantum-cascade laser-based instrument for carbon monoxide measurements. , 2005, Applied optics.

[112]  Axel Lauer,et al.  © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles , 2022 .

[113]  Athanasios Nenes,et al.  Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models , 2005 .

[114]  V. Larson,et al.  Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments , 2005 .

[115]  David S. Covert,et al.  Variability of aerosol optical properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE‐Asia , 2003 .

[116]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Comprehensive Laboratory Measurements of Biomass-Burning Emissions: 1. Emissions from Indonesian, African, and Other Fuels , 2003 .

[117]  Philip B. Russell,et al.  Geostationary satellite retrievals of aerosol optical thickness during ACE‐Asia , 2003 .

[118]  P. Formenti,et al.  Inorganic and carbonaceous aerosols during the Southern African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI 2000) experiment: Chemical characteristics, physical properties, and emission data for smoke from African biomass burning , 2003 .

[119]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Modeling the solar radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during the Southern African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI-2000) experiment , 2003 .

[120]  J. Privette,et al.  Africa burning: A thematic analysis of the Southern African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI 2000) , 2003 .

[121]  M. Stephens,et al.  Particle identification by laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity. , 2003, Applied optics.

[122]  Mian Chin,et al.  Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility , 2003 .

[123]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  GOES-8 Retrieval of Dust Aerosol Optical Thickness over the Atlantic , 2003 .

[124]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements , 2002 .

[125]  P. Hamill,et al.  Dependence of Aerosol Light Absorption and Single-Scattering Albedo On Ambient Relative Humidity for Sulfate Aerosols with Black Carbon Cores , 2001 .

[126]  D. Jacob,et al.  Constraints from 210Pb and 7Be on wet deposition and transport in a global three‐dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological fields , 2001 .

[127]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module , 2001 .

[128]  G. Martin,et al.  A New Boundary Layer Mixing Scheme. Part I: Scheme Description and Single-Column Model Tests , 2000 .

[129]  Leonard K. Peters,et al.  A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large‐scale applications , 1999 .

[130]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[131]  J. Ogren,et al.  Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .

[132]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Local Versus Nonlocal Boundary-Layer Diffusion in a Global Climate Model , 1993 .

[133]  S. Klein,et al.  The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform Clouds , 1993 .

[134]  J. Fishman,et al.  Identification of Widespread Pollution in the Southern Hemisphere Deduced from Satellite Analyses , 1991, Science.

[135]  M. Wesely Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models , 1989 .

[136]  E. Eloranta,et al.  High spectral resolution lidar to measure optical scattering properties of atmospheric aerosols. 1: theory and instrumentation. , 1983, Applied optics.