Combined Use of Integral Experiments and Covariance Data

Abstract In the frame of a US-DOE sponsored project, ANL, BNL, INL and LANL have performed a joint multidisciplinary research activity in order to explore the combined use of integral experiments and covariance data with the objective to both give quantitative indications on possible improvements of the ENDF evaluated data files and to reduce at the same time crucial reactor design parameter uncertainties. Methods that have been developed in the last four decades for the purposes indicated above have been improved by some new developments that benefited also by continuous exchanges with international groups working in similar areas. The major new developments that allowed significant progress are to be found in several specific domains: a) new science-based covariance data; b) integral experiment covariance data assessment and improved experiment analysis, e.g., of sample irradiation experiments; c) sensitivity analysis, where several improvements were necessary despite the generally good understanding of these techniques, e.g., to account for fission spectrum sensitivity; d) a critical approach to the analysis of statistical adjustments performance, both a priori and a posteriori; e) generalization of the assimilation method, now applied for the first time not only to multigroup cross sections data but also to nuclear model parameters (the “consistent” method). This article describes the major results obtained in each of these areas; a large scale nuclear data adjustment, based on the use of approximately one hundred high-accuracy integral experiments, will be reported along with a significant example of the application of the new “consistent” method of data assimilation.

[1]  M. W. Herman,et al.  EMPIRE: Nuclear Reaction Model Code System for Data Evaluation , 2007 .

[2]  Donald L. Smith,et al.  Evaluated Nuclear Data Covariances: The Journey From ENDF/B-VII.0 to ENDF/B-VII.1 , 2011 .

[3]  Makoto Ishikawa,et al.  Recent Application of Nuclear Data to Fast Reactor Core Analysis and Design in Japan , 2005 .

[4]  Philip R. Page,et al.  ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology , 2006 .

[5]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Covariance Data in the Fast Neutron Region , 2011 .

[6]  M. W. Herman,et al.  Development of covariance capabilities in EMPIRE code , 2008 .

[7]  Dorothea Wiarda,et al.  Low-fidelity Covariance Project , 2008 .

[8]  Tatiana Ivanova,et al.  Towards validation of criticality calculations for systems with MOX powders , 2009 .

[9]  J. B. Dragt,et al.  Methods of Adjustment and Error Evaluation of Neutron Capture Cross Sections; Application to Fission Product Nuclides , 1977 .

[10]  日本原子力研究所,et al.  MVP/GMVP II : General purpose Monte Carlo codes for neutron and photon transport calculations based on continuous energy and multigroup methods , 2005 .

[11]  Virginia A. F. Dean The Benchmark Evaluation Process: From Experimental Data to Benchmark Model , 2003 .

[12]  R. S. Baker,et al.  DANTSYS: A diffusion accelerated neutral particle transport code system , 1995 .

[13]  Masayuki Nakagawa,et al.  Error estimations and their biases in Monte Carlo eigenvalue calculations , 1997 .

[14]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis of the EXFOR Database , 2011 .

[15]  Chang Hyo Kim,et al.  Real Variance Estimation Using an Intercycle Fission Source Correlation for Monte Carlo Eigenvalue Calculations , 2009 .

[16]  I. Kodeli,et al.  Multidimensional Deterministic Nuclear Data Sensitivity and Uncertainty Code System: Method and Application , 2001 .

[17]  M. Williams,et al.  Eigenvalue Sensitivity Theory for Resonance-Shielded Cross Sections , 2001 .

[18]  M. Herman DEVELOPMENT OF ENDF/B-VII.1 AND ITS COVARIANCE COMPONENT , 2010 .

[19]  Tadashi Yoshida,et al.  Simultaneous Evaluation of Fission Cross Sections of Uranium and Plutonium Isotopes for JENDL-3.3 , 2000 .

[20]  Tsuneo Nakagawa,et al.  Covariance Evaluation for Actinide Nuclear Data in JENDL-4 , 2011 .

[21]  Osamu Iwamoto,et al.  Development of a Comprehensive Code for Nuclear Data Evaluation, CCONE, and Validation Using Neutron-Induced Cross Sections for Uranium Isotopes , 2007 .

[22]  P. Oblozinsky,et al.  Formalism for neutron cross section covariances in the resonance region using kernel approximation , 2010 .

[23]  K. F. Raskach,et al.  Use of International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Data for Validation of the ABBN Cross-Section Library with the MMK-KENO Code , 2003 .

[24]  M. Williams,et al.  Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Capabilities and Data in SCALE , 2011 .

[25]  J. B. Briggs,et al.  Identification of Integral Benchmarks for Nuclear Data Testing Using DICE (Database for the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments) , 2011 .

[26]  Patrick Talou,et al.  Evaluation of Neutron Reactions for ENDF/B-VII: 232–241U and 239Pu , 2007 .

[27]  Bradley T Rearden,et al.  Methods and issues for the combined use of integral experiments and covariance data: Results of a NEA international collaborative study , 2014 .

[28]  Said F. Mughabghab,et al.  Atlas of Neutron Resonances: Resonance Parameters and Thermal Cross Sections. Z=1-100 , 2006 .

[29]  G. Noguere,et al.  Uncertainty Evaluation of Nuclear Reaction Model Parameters using Integral and Microscopic Measurements with the CONRAD Code , 2011 .

[30]  Tatiana Ivanova,et al.  Impact of Cross-Section-Covariance Data on Results of High-Confidence Criticality Validation , 2011 .

[31]  A. J. Koninga,et al.  New working methods for nuclear data evaluation : how to make a nuclear data library ? , 2008 .

[32]  Arjan J. Koning,et al.  Nuclear Data Uncertainty Propagation: Total Monte Carlo vs. Covariances , 2011 .

[33]  N. M. Larson,et al.  Updated Users' Guide for SAMMY Multilevel R-matrix Fits to Neutron Data Using Bayes' Equation , 1998 .

[34]  Donald L. Smith,et al.  Probability, statistics, and data uncertainties in nuclear science and technology , 1991 .

[35]  K. Shibata,et al.  JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering , 2011 .

[36]  K. F. Raskach,et al.  Influence of the Correlations of Experimental Uncertainties on Criticality Prediction , 2003 .