Scalp potentials evoked by amplitude-modulated tones in dyslexia.

We recorded the far-field EEG potential evoked by amplitude modulation of acoustic stimuli (the amplitude modulation following response, AMFR) in adults with developmental dyslexia and in a matched control group of adults with no history of reading problems. The mean AMFR recorded from participants with dyslexia was significantly smaller than that recorded from members of the control group. In contrast, the amplitude of the click-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) was not significantly different between participant groups. Also, there was no difference between participant groups in the latency of the AMFR or ABR. The reduced AMFR in listeners with dyslexia may reflect impaired ability of the auditory system to follow rapid changes in stimulus energy, a cue believed to be important in the perception of speech.

[1]  P. Bryant,et al.  Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection , 1983, Nature.

[2]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al.  Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones , 1986, Hearing Research.

[4]  P. Bryant,et al.  Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness , 1978, Nature.

[5]  J. Jerger,et al.  Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds , 1959 .

[6]  T W Picton,et al.  Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. Tallal.  Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children , 1980, Brain and Language.

[8]  A. Rees,et al.  Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man , 1986, Hearing Research.

[9]  J. Stein,et al.  Auditory temporal coding in dyslexia , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  G. Ratcliff,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence of auditory channel anomalies in developmental dysphasia. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[11]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[12]  J. Werker,et al.  Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[13]  D. Mountain,et al.  The envelope following response: Scalp potentials elicited in the mongolian gerbil using sinusoidally AM acoustic signals , 1992, Hearing Research.

[14]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Evidence for a Magnocellular Defect in Developmental Dyslexia a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Rutter,et al.  The concept of specific reading retardation. , 1975, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[17]  N. Viemeister.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Godfrey,et al.  Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. , 1981, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[20]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[22]  Curt von Euler,et al.  Temporal Information Processing in the Nervous System: Special Reference to Dyslexia and Dysphasia. Conference proceedings. New York City, New York, September 12-15, 1992. , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  G M Clark,et al.  Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude modulated tones in the monkey. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[24]  J. Tomblin,et al.  Auditory evoked responses to frequency-modulated tones in children with specific language impairment. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  The human frequency-following response (FFR): Normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response , 1992, Hearing Research.

[26]  P. Tallal,et al.  Defects of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Children with Developmental Aphasia , 1973, Nature.

[27]  Normal ABR's in dyslexic children. , 1988, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[28]  J. Stein,et al.  Analysis of perceptual confusions between nine sets of consonant-vowel sounds in normal and dyslexic adults , 1996, Cognition.

[29]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech , 1996, Science.

[30]  R E Eilers,et al.  Speech perception in adult subjects with familial dyslexia. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[31]  T. Houtgast,et al.  A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .