Enhanced Performance of Protonic Solid Oxide Steam Electrolysis Cell of Zr-Rich Side BaZr0.6Ce0.2Y0.2O3−δ Electrolyte with an Anode Functional Layer

Proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells (H-SOEC) containing a 15-μm-thick BaZr0.6Ce0.2Y0.2O3−δ (BZCY622) electrolyte thin film, porous cathode cermet support, and La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ anodes were fabricated using a reactive cofiring process at approximately 1400 °C. Steam electrolysis was conducted by supplying wet air to the anode at a water partial pressure of 20 kPa. The performance was evaluated using electrochemical measurements and gas chromatography. At 600 °C, the cells generated an electrolysis current of 0.47 A cm–2 at a 1.3 V bias while the Faradaic efficiency reached 56% using 400 mA cm–2. The electrolysis performance was efficiently improved by introducing a 40-nm-thick La0.5Sr0.5CoO3−δ (LSC) nanolayer as an anode functional layer (AFL). The cells with LSC AFL produced an electrolysis current of 0.87 A cm–2 at a 1.3 V bias at 600 °C, and the Faradaic efficiency reached 65% under 400 mA cm–2. Impedance analysis showed that the introduction of the AFL decreased the ohmic resistances and improved interfacial proton transfer across the anode/electrolyte interface and polarization resistances related to the anode reaction. These results demonstrate opportunities for future research on AFL to improve the performance of H-SOECs with Zr-rich BaZrxCe1–x–yYyO3−δ electrolytes.

[1]  Y. Aoki,et al.  Development of Hydrogen-Permeable Metal Support Electrolysis Cells , 2022, ACS Applied Energy Materials.

[2]  Y. Hu,et al.  Degradation issues and stabilization strategies of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells for steam electrolysis , 2021, Energy Science & Engineering.

[3]  R. Kee,et al.  Faradaic efficiency in protonic-ceramic electrolysis cells , 2021, Journal of Physics: Energy.

[4]  Y. Aoki,et al.  Metal/Oxide Heterojunction Boosts Fuel Cell Cathode Reaction at Low Temperatures , 2021 .

[5]  Y. Aoki,et al.  The effect of an anode functional layer on the steam electrolysis performances of protonic solid oxide cells , 2021 .

[6]  Zhiwen Ma,et al.  Modeling the performance and faradaic efficiency of solid oxide electrolysis cells using doped barium zirconate perovskite electrolytes , 2021 .

[7]  A. Chiara,et al.  Solid–Solid Interfaces in Protonic Ceramic Devices: A Critical Review , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[8]  F. Chen,et al.  Energy storage and hydrogen production by proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells with a novel heterogeneous design , 2020 .

[9]  S. Jeong,et al.  Proton Pumping Boosts Energy Conversion in Hydrogen-Permeable Metal-Supported Protonic Fuel Cells , 2020 .

[10]  M. Ni,et al.  Progress Report on Proton Conducting Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells , 2019, Advanced Functional Materials.

[11]  J. M. Serra,et al.  Mixed proton and electron conducting double perovskite anodes for stable and efficient tubular proton ceramic electrolysers , 2019, Nature Materials.

[12]  N. Sullivan,et al.  Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production , 2019, Nature Energy.

[13]  Zongping Shao,et al.  Gas Humidification Impact on the Properties and Performance of Perovskite‐Type Functional Materials in Proton‐Conducting Solid Oxide Cells , 2018, Advanced Functional Materials.

[14]  N. Zhang,et al.  High performing triple-conductive Pr2NiO4+δ anode for proton-conducting steam solid oxide electrolysis cell , 2018 .

[15]  Yong Ding,et al.  3D Self‐Architectured Steam Electrode Enabled Efficient and Durable Hydrogen Production in a Proton‐Conducting Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell at Temperatures Lower Than 600 °C , 2018, Advanced science.

[16]  S. Jeong,et al.  Evaluation of thin film fuel cells with Zr-rich BaZrxCe0.8−xY0.2O3−δ electrolytes (x ≥ 0.4) fabricated by a single-step reactive sintering method , 2018, RSC advances.

[17]  Tak-Hyoung Lim,et al.  Hybrid-solid oxide electrolysis cell: A new strategy for efficient hydrogen production , 2018 .

[18]  Chusheng Chen,et al.  The beneficial effects of straight open large pores in the support on steam electrolysis performance of electrode-supported solid oxide electrolysis cell , 2018 .

[19]  Yalin Lu,et al.  New, Efficient, and Reliable Air Electrode Material for Proton-Conducting Reversible Solid Oxide Cells. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[20]  G. C. Mather,et al.  Temperature dependence of partial conductivities of the BaZr0.7Ce0.2Y0.1O3-δ proton conductor , 2017 .

[21]  G. Wahnström,et al.  Comparison of Space-Charge Formation at Grain Boundaries in Proton-Conducting BaZrO3 and BaCeO3 , 2017 .

[22]  H. Matsumoto,et al.  Influence of dopant levels on the hydration properties of SZCY and BZCY proton conducting ceramics for hydrogen production , 2017 .

[23]  E. Traversa,et al.  Y-doped BaZrO3 as a chemically stable electrolyte for proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) , 2015 .

[24]  G. Friedbacher,et al.  The relevance of interfaces for oxide ion transport in yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) thin films. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[25]  N. Bonanos,et al.  Microstructure and performance of La0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ cathodes deposited on BaCe0.2Zr0.7Y0.1O3−δ by infiltration and spray pyrolysis , 2012 .

[26]  S. Bharadwaj,et al.  Synthesis, stability and conductivity of BaCe0.8−xZrxY0.2O3−δ as electrolyte for proton conducting SOFC , 2012 .

[27]  S. McIntosh,et al.  On the reversibility of anode supported proton conducting solid oxide cells , 2011 .

[28]  M. Pouchard,et al.  Electrochemical properties of perovskite and A2MO4-type oxides used as cathodes in protonic ceramic half cells , 2011 .

[29]  Donglin Han,et al.  Synthesis of La1 − xSrxSc1 − yFeyO3 − δ (LSSF) and measurement of water content in LSSF, LSCF and LSC hydrated in wet artificial air at 300 °C , 2010 .

[30]  Ryan O'Hayre,et al.  Solid-state reactive sintering mechanism for large-grained yttrium-doped barium zirconate proton conducting ceramics , 2010 .

[31]  Zongping Shao,et al.  Optimizing the modification method of zinc-enhanced sintering of BaZr0.4Ce0.4Y0.2O3−δ-based electrolytes for application in an anode-supported protonic solid oxide fuel cell , 2010 .

[32]  Jin-Young Kim,et al.  Performance Deterioration of Ni-YSZ Anode Induced by Electrochemically Generated Steam in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells , 2010 .

[33]  Fei He,et al.  Cathode reaction models and performance analysis of Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3−δ–BaCe0.8Sm0.2O3−δ composite cathode for solid oxide fuel cells with proton conducting electrolyte , 2009 .

[34]  C. Xia,et al.  Nano-sized Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3―δ as the cathode for solid oxide fuel cells with proton-conducting electrolytes of BaCe0.8Sm0.2O2.9 , 2009 .

[35]  Stephen J. Skinner,et al.  Solid oxide proton conducting steam electrolysers , 2008 .

[36]  J. Janek,et al.  Ionic conductivity and activation energy for oxygen ion transport in superlattices--the semicoherent multilayer system YSZ (ZrO2 + 9.5 mol% Y2O3)/Y2O3. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[37]  S. Licoccia,et al.  Tailoring the chemical stability of Ba(Ce0.8−xZrx)Y0.2O3−δ protonic conductors for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (IT-SOFCs) , 2008 .

[38]  J. Irvine,et al.  La0.75Sr0.25)0.95Mn0.5Cr0.5O3 as the cathode of solid oxide electrolysis cells for high temperature hydrogen production from steam , 2008 .

[39]  D. Leung,et al.  Technological development of hydrogen production by solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) , 2008 .

[40]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  Electrochemical Characterization of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8 O 3 Cathodes for Intermediate-Temperature SOFCs , 2004 .

[41]  J. Janek,et al.  Ionic conductivity and activation energy for oxygen ion transport in superlattices — the semicoherent multilayer system YSZ ( ZrO 2 + 9 . 5 mol % Y 2 O 3 ) / Y 2 O 3 , 2008 .