Ultimate limits of thermal pattern recognition

Quantum Channel Discrimination (QCD) presents a fundamental task in quantum information theory, with critical applications in quantum reading, illumination, data-readout and more. The extension to multiple quantum channel discrimination has seen a recent focus to characterise potential quantum advantage associated with quantum enhanced discriminatory protocols. In this paper, we study thermal imaging as an environment localisation task, in which thermal images are modelled as ensembles of Gaussian phase insensitive channels with identical transmissivity, and pixels possess properties according to background (cold) or target (warm) thermal channels. Via the teleportation stretching of adaptive quantum protocols, we derive ultimate limits on the precision of pattern classification of abstract, binary thermal image spaces, and show that quantum enhanced strategies may be used to provide significant quantum advantage over known optimal classical strategies. The environmental conditions and necessary resources for which advantage may be obtained are studied and discussed. We then numerically investigate the use of quantum enhanced statistical classifiers, in which quantum sensors are used in conjunction with machine learning image classification methods. Proving definitive advantage in the low loss regime, this work motivates the use of quantum enhanced sources for short-range thermal imaging and detection techniques for future quantum technologies.

[1]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[2]  Travis S. Humble,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[3]  Matteo G. A. Paris,et al.  The modern tools of quantum mechanics , 2011, 1110.6815.

[4]  John Preskill,et al.  Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , 2018, Quantum.

[5]  A. Serafini Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods , 2017 .

[6]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Fundamental limits to quantum channel discrimination , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[7]  S. Pirandola,et al.  General Benchmarks for Quantum Repeaters , 2015, 1512.04945.

[8]  Osamu Hirota,et al.  Error Free Quantum Reading by Quasi Bell State of Entangled Coherent States , 2011, 1108.4163.

[9]  S. Pirandola,et al.  Entanglement-enhanced testing of multiple quantum hypotheses , 2020, Communications Physics.

[10]  S. Pirandola,et al.  Microwave quantum illumination using a digital receiver , 2020, Science Advances.

[11]  E Solano,et al.  Quantum illumination reveals phase-shift inducing cloaking , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Samuel L. Braunstein,et al.  Channel Simulation in Quantum Metrology , 2017, 1712.06603.

[13]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Convex optimization of programmable quantum computers , 2019, npj Quantum Information.

[14]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Quantum illumination versus coherent-state target detection , 2009, 0902.0986.

[15]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Advances in photonic quantum sensing , 2018, Nature Photonics.

[16]  Anthony Chefles Quantum state discrimination , 2000 .

[17]  Samuel L. Braunstein,et al.  Theory of channel simulation and bounds for private communication , 2017, Quantum Science and Technology.

[18]  E. Knill,et al.  Reversing quantum dynamics with near-optimal quantum and classical fidelity , 2000, quant-ph/0004088.

[19]  S. Lloyd Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination , 2008, Science.

[20]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Advances in quantum metrology , 2011, 1102.2318.

[21]  S. Pirandola,et al.  Experimental quantum reading with photon counting , 2020, Science Advances.

[22]  Gaetana Spedalieri,et al.  Cryptographic Aspects of Quantum Reading , 2015, Entropy.

[23]  Joonwoo Bae,et al.  Quantum state discrimination and its applications , 2015, 1707.02571.