Micro-level groundtruthing environment for OMR

A simple framework for evaluating OMR at the symbol level is presented. While a true evaluation of an OMR system requires a high-level analysis, the automation of which is a largely unsolved problem, many high-level errors are correlated to these more tractably-analyzed lowerlevel errors.

[1]  Masayuki Okamoto,et al.  Performance evaluation of a robust method for mathematical expression recognition , 2001, Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[2]  Song Mao,et al.  Empirical Performance Evaluation Methodology and Its Application to Page Segmentation Algorithms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Luc M. Vincent,et al.  Benchmarking page segmentation algorithms , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  George Nagy,et al.  Automated Evaluation of OCR Zoning , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Dov Dori,et al.  A protocol for performance evaluation of line detection algorithms , 1997, Machine Vision and Applications.

[6]  Daniel P. Lopresti,et al.  Why table ground-truthing is hard , 2001, Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[7]  Stefan Hinz,et al.  A scheme for road extraction in rural areas and its evaluation , 2000, Proceedings Fifth IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision.

[8]  Ihsin T. Phillips,et al.  A Benchmark for Graphics Recognition Systems , 1998 .

[9]  Troels Mørch.  Test Driven Development , 2005 .

[10]  Dov Dori,et al.  Cost Evaluation of Interactively Correcting Recognized Engineering Drawings , 1999, GREC.