Choice: A local analysis.

Analyses of free-operant choice usually employ one of two general procedures: the simple concurrent procedure (i.e., a concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule) or the concurrent-chains procedure (i.e., concurrently available initial links, each leading to an exclusively available terminal link). Theories about choice usually focus on only one of the two procedures. For example, maximization theories, which assert that behavior is distributed between two alternatives in such a way that overall rate of reinforcement is maximized, have been applied only to the simple concurrent procedure. In the present paper, a form of the pairing hypothesis (according to which pairings between one stimulus and another affect the value of the first, and pairings between responses and reinforcers affect the value of the former) is developed in a way that allows it to make qualitative predictions with regard to choice in a variety of simple concurrent and concurrent-chains procedures. The predictions include matching on concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules, preference reversal in the self-control paradigm, and preference for tandem over chained terminal links.

[1]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  R. Herrnstein APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND NUMBER OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENTS1 , 1968 .

[6]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  C. Shimp Optimal behavior in free-operant experiments. , 1969 .

[9]  E. Fantino Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  N Squires,et al.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  E Fantino,et al.  Some effects of interreinforcement time upon choice. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  D Macewen,et al.  The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE TO REWARD1 , 1972 .

[15]  M C Davison,et al.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  G. Ainslie,et al.  Impulse control in pigeons. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  G. Ainslie Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Richard J. Herrnstein,et al.  MAXIMIZING AND MATCHING ON CONCURRENT RATIO SCHEDULES1 , 1975 .

[19]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Self-control and general models of choice. , 1976 .

[20]  S E Lea,et al.  Titration of schedule parameters by pigeons. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  E. Fantino,et al.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  H. Rachlin A molar theory of reinforcement schedules. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  J. Staddon,et al.  On matching and maximizing in operant choice experiments. , 1978 .

[24]  G M Heyman,et al.  Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio? , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  J Moore,et al.  Choice and number of reinforcers. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  L Green,et al.  Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Choice between Rewards Differing in Amount and Delay: toward a Choice Model of Self Control , 2022 .

[27]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Melioration and Behavioral Allocation1 , 1980 .

[28]  J. E. Mazur Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation. , 1981, Science.

[29]  R. Shull,et al.  Delay or rate of food delivery as determiners of response rate. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement , 1981 .

[31]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[32]  W Vaughan,et al.  Melioration, matching, and maximization. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[33]  P R Killeen,et al.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  J E Staddon,et al.  Matching, maximizing, and hill-climbing. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  The delay-reduction hypothesis: Extension to three-alternative choice. , 1983 .

[36]  E Fantino,et al.  Choice: Some quantitative relations. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  Melloration and maximization of reinforcement minus costs of behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.