A medical home: Value and implications of knowledge management

Background: Central to the "medical home" concept is the premise that the delivery of effective primary care requires a fundamental shift in relationships among practice members and between practice members and patients. Primary care practices can potentially increase their capacity to deliver effective care through knowledge management (KM), a process of sharing and making existing knowledge available or by developing new knowledge among practice members and patients. KM affects performance by influencing work relationships to enhance learning, decision making, and task execution. Purpose: We extend our previous work to further characterize, describe, and contrast how primary care practices exhibit KM and explain why KM deserves attention in medical home redesign initiatives. Methodology: Case studies were conducted, drawn from two higher and lower performing practices, which were purposely selected based on disease management, prevention, and productivity measures from an improvement trial. Observations of operations, clinical encounters, meetings, and interviews with office members and patients were transcribed and coded independently using a KM template developed from a previous secondary analysis. Face-to-face discussions resolved coding differences among research team members. Confirmation of findings was sought from practice participants. Findings: Practices manifested varying degrees of KM effectiveness through six interdependent processes and multiple overlapping tools. Social tools, such as face-to-face-communication for sharing and developing knowledge, were often more effective than were expensive technical tools such as an electronic medical record. Tool use was tailored for specific outcomes, interacted with each other, and leveraged by other organizational capacities. Practices with effective KM were more open to adopting and sustaining new ways of functioning, ways reflecting attributes of a medical home. Practice Implications: Knowledge management differences occur within and between practices and can explain differences in performance. By relying more on social tools rather than costly, high-tech investment, KM leverages primary care's relationship-centered strength, facilitating practice redesign as a medical home.

[1]  T. Walley,et al.  Do quality incentives change prescribing patterns in primary care? An observational study in Scotland. , 2008, Family practice.

[2]  Davida Scharf,et al.  A Knowledge Management Model: Implications for Enhancing Quality in Health Care , 2006 .

[3]  John G. Scott,et al.  Strategies for Conducting Complex Clinical Trials in Diverse Community Practices , 2007, Medical care.

[4]  L. Solberg,et al.  Failure of a continuous quality improvement intervention to increase the delivery of preventive services. A randomized trial. , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[5]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Are Attributes of Organizational Performance in Large Health Care Organizations Relevant in Primary Care Practices? , 2006, Health care management review.

[6]  E. Volpintesta Patient-physician relationship. , 1993, The Journal of family practice.

[7]  Laurence Prusak,et al.  Where did knowledge management come from? , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[8]  Kurt C Stange,et al.  Performance Improvement , 2006 .

[9]  Mark W. McElroy,et al.  Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Elizabeth E. Stewart,et al.  Improve office efficiency in mere minutes. , 2007, Family practice management.

[11]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  The Teamlet Model of Primary Care , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[12]  Davida Scharf,et al.  Family medicine practice performance and knowledge management , 2008, Health care management review.

[13]  Kenneth L Evans,et al.  The Future of Family Medicine: A Collaborative Project of the Family Medicine Community , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[14]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  A John Orzano,et al.  What can family medicine practices do to facilitate knowledge management? , 2008, Health care management review.

[16]  Elizabeth E. Stewart,et al.  Huddles: Improve Office Efficiency in Mere Minutes , 2007 .

[17]  R. McDaniel,et al.  7 characteristics of successful work relationships. , 2006, Family practice management.

[18]  Kurt C Stange,et al.  Understanding Organizational Designs of Primary Care Practices , 2003, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[19]  Cheri Bethune Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change behavior , 2009 .

[20]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Increasing Capacity for Innovation in Bureaucratic Primary Care Organizations: A Whole System Participatory Action Research Project , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[21]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. , 2001, Health affairs.

[22]  J. Rogers The Patient-Centered Medical Home Movement—Promise and Peril for Family Medicine , 2008, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[23]  Paul L Dassow Measuring Performance in Primary Care: What Patient Outcome Indicators Do Physicians Value? , 2007, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[24]  B. Starfield,et al.  Primary care, race, and mortality in US states. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[25]  Shawna V. Hudson,et al.  Improving Outcomes for High-Risk Diabetics Using Information Systems , 2007, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[26]  Laura A. McLellan,et al.  New Knowledge for and About Primary Care: A View Through the Looking Glass of the Annals of Family Medicine , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[27]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[28]  Reuben R McDaniel,et al.  Strategies for developing a knowledge-driven culture in your practice. , 2007, Family practice management.

[29]  Michelle E. Jordan,et al.  Surprise, Surprise, Surprise! A Complexity Science View of the Unexpected , 2003, Health care management review.

[30]  M. Fischetti Working knowledge. , 2003, Scientific American.

[31]  Amy P. Hutton,et al.  Four rules for taking your message to Wall Street. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[32]  John G. Scott,et al.  Implementing an Electronic Medical Record in a Family Medicine Practice: Communication, Decision Making, and Conflict , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[33]  D. Wong,et al.  Motivational interviewing in health care: Helping patients change behavior , 2009 .

[34]  Martin Eccles,et al.  Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. , 2004, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[35]  Judith Smith,et al.  The effect of L-dopa on the potentiation of radiation damage to human melanoma cells. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[36]  K. Grumbach,et al.  Does having more physicians lead to better health system performance? , 2008, JAMA.

[37]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Speeding Up Team Learning. , 2001 .

[38]  B. Starfield,et al.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[39]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship. , 1992, JAMA.

[40]  L. Solberg Improving Medical Practice: A Conceptual Framework , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[41]  B. Starfield,et al.  Quantifying the Health Benefits of Primary Care Physician Supply in the United States , 2007, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[42]  V. Hunt Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era , 1997, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.