An Analysis on High School Students’ Perceptions of Physics Courses in Terms of Gender (A Sample from Turkey)

This study was carried out to determine high school students’ perceptions of the courses of Physics and the factors influential on their perceptions with respect to gender. The research sample included 154 high school students (F:78; M:76). In the study, as the data collection tool, a structured interview form was used. The data collected in the study were analyzed with frequency analysis, Chi-square and content analysis. As a result of the study, it was found that the male students were found themselves more successful in the courses of physics and that they experienced less difficulty with the courses. It was also revealed that there were no differences between female and male students’ views related to physics entertaining, importance and permanency yet difficult in terms of mathematical calculations. In general, the students had bias regarding physics and stated that the current course of physics was not efficient and that interactive and practical methods should be put into practice. According to the results, the male students demonstrated more positive attitudes than the female students. In the light of the findings obtained, it could be stated that current high school applications in the courses of physics should be revised by authorities.

[1]  B. N. Githua SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF MATHEMATICS FORMATIVE EVALUATION AND THE PERCEPTIONS' RELATIONSHIP TO THEIR MOTIVATION TO LEARN THE SUBJECT BY GENDER IN NAIROBI AND RIFT VALLEY PROVINCES, KENYA , 2013 .

[2]  C. DesForges,et al.  The Impact of Parental Involvement, Parental Support and Family Education on Pupil Achievement and Adjustment: a literature review , 2003 .

[3]  Unpacking Gender Differences in Students’ Perceived Experiences in Introductory Physics , 2009 .

[4]  What Works for Women in Undergraduate Physics , 2005 .

[5]  N. Reid,et al.  Gender and physics , 2003 .

[6]  J. Meece,et al.  SELF-EFFICACY DEVELOPMENT IN ADOLESCENCES , 2005 .

[7]  S. Mandina,et al.  Increasing female participation in advanced level mathematics: a perspective from students and teachers in Zimbabwe , 2013 .

[8]  Z. Hazari,et al.  Views on Female Under-Representation in Physics: Retraining Women or Reinventing Physics? , 2005 .

[9]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[10]  J. Morse Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[11]  C. Hill,et al.  Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. , 2010 .

[12]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[13]  A. I. Şen,et al.  Evaluation of Beliefs and Attitudes of High School Students towards Science and Mathematics Courses , 2011 .

[14]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math Male , Me Female , Therefore Math Me , 2002 .

[15]  Michael E. Cox A basic guide for empirical environmental social science , 2015 .

[16]  Arsaythamby Veloo,et al.  Attitude Towards Physics and Additional Mathematics Achievement Towards Physics Achievement. , 2015 .

[17]  Frances Quinn,et al.  High school students' perceptions of school science and science careers: A critical look at a critical issue , 2011 .

[18]  C. MacPhee,et al.  Gender differences in conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics: a UK cross-institution comparison , 2012, 1211.3888.

[19]  Kola Jacob,et al.  Instructional Materials and Improvisation in Physics Class: Implications for Teaching and Learning , 2013 .

[20]  J. Ryder,et al.  Sources of differential participation rates in school science: the impact of curriculum reform , 2011 .

[21]  S. Saleh Malaysian Students' Motivation towards Physics Learning. , 2014 .

[22]  Sarah B. McKagan,et al.  Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent,and what factors influence the gap? , 2013, 1307.0912.

[23]  B. Hannover,et al.  What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[24]  Roman Czujko,et al.  Women Physicists Speak: The 2001 International Study of Women in Physics. , 2002 .

[25]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a “smog of bias” , 2010 .

[26]  Preecha P. Yupapin,et al.  WGMs on-Chip Design for Interdisciplinary Studies , 2013 .

[27]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. , 2002 .

[28]  M. Linn,et al.  New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.