Multimodal route choice models of public transport passengers in the Greater Copenhagen Area

Understanding route choice behavior is crucial to explain travelers’ preferences and to predict traffic flows under different scenarios. A growing body of literature has concentrated on public transport users without, however, concentrating on multimodal public transport networks because of their inherent complexity and challenges. In particular, choice set generation and modeling route choice behavior while accounting for similarity across alternatives and heterogeneity across travelers are non-trivial challenges. This paper tackles these challenges by focusing on the revealed preferences of 5,641 public transport users in the Greater Copenhagen Area. A two-stage approach consisting of choice set generation and route choice model estimation allowed uncovering the preferences of the users of this multimodal large-scale public transport network. The results illustrate the rates of substitution not only of the in-vehicle times for different public transport modes, but also of the other time components (e.g., access, walking, waiting, transfer) composing the door-to-door experience of using a multimodal public transport network, differentiating by trip length and purpose, and accounting for heterogeneity across travelers.

[1]  Piet H. L. Bovy,et al.  Modelling route choice behaviour in multi-modal transport networks , 2005 .

[2]  Marie Karen Anderson,et al.  Behavioural Models for Route Choice of Passengers in Multimodal Public Transport Networks , 2013 .

[3]  Michael Scott Ramming,et al.  NETWORK KNOWLEDGE AND ROUTE CHOICE , 2002 .

[4]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  The value of travel time variance , 2010 .

[5]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  Optimisation of timetable-based, stochastic transit assignment models based on MSA , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  A Large Scale Stochastic Multi-Class Schedule-Based Transit Model with Random Coefficients , 2004 .

[7]  Fumitaka Kurauchi,et al.  Estimating Weights of Times and Transfers for Hyperpath Travelers , 2012 .

[8]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  A Stochastic Traffic Assignment Model Considering Differences in Passengers Utility Functions , 2000 .

[9]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  The Danish Value of Time Study: Results for experiment 1 , 2007 .

[10]  Linda Christensen,et al.  The Role of Web Interviews as Part of a National Travel Survey , 2013 .

[11]  Carlo G. Prato,et al.  Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions , 2009 .

[12]  Sebastián Raveau,et al.  A topological route choice model for metro , 2011 .

[13]  Richard D. Knowles,et al.  Transit Oriented Development in Copenhagen, Denmark: from the Finger Plan to Ørestad , 2012 .

[14]  Carlo G. Prato,et al.  The Factor of Revisited Path Size , 2008 .

[15]  Stephane Hess,et al.  On the use of a Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a Mixed Logit Model for vehicle choice , 2006 .

[16]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  Generation and quality assessment of route choice sets in public transport networks by means of RP data analysis , 2010 .

[17]  S. Lanser,et al.  Modelling Travel Behaviour in Multi-modal Networks , 2005 .

[18]  J Van Der Waard The relative importance of public transport trip time attributes in route choice , 1988 .

[19]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  Handbook of transportation science , 1999 .

[20]  Trude Tørset Kollektivtransportmodellering: Kan eksisterende transportmodeller utvikles slik at de blir mer egnet til analyser av kollektivtransport? , 2005 .

[21]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Meta-analysis of UK values of travel time: An update , 2011 .

[22]  Ahmed El-Geneidy,et al.  Travel mode choice and transit route choice behavior in Montreal: insights from McGill University members commute patterns , 2012, Public Transp..