Clinical DT-MRI estimation, smoothing and fiber tracking with Log-Euclidean metrics

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI or DTI) is an imaging modality that is gaining importance in clinical applications. However, in a clinical environment, data have to be acquired rapidly, often at the expense of the image quality. This often results in DTI datasets that are not suitable for complex postprocessing like fiber tracking. We propose a new variational framework to improve the estimation of DT-MRI in this clinical context. Most of the existing estimation methods rely on a log-Gaussian noise (Gaussian noise on the image logarithms), or a Gaussian noise, that do not reflect the Rician nature of the noise in MR images with a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). With these methods, the Rician noise induces a shrinking effect: the tensor volume is underestimated when other noise models are used for the estimation. In this paper, we propose a maximum likelihood strategy that fully exploits the assumption of a Rician noise. To further reduce the influence of the noise, we optimally exploit the spatial correlation by coupling the estimation with an anisotropic prior previously proposed on the spatial regularity of the tensor field itself, which results in a maximum a posteriori estimation. Optimizing such a nonlinear criterion requires adapted tools for tensor computing. We show that Riemannian metrics for tensors, and more specifically the log-Euclidean metrics, are a good candidate and that this criterion can be efficiently optimized. Experiments on synthetic data show that our method correctly handles the shrinking effect even with very low SNR, and that the positive definiteness of tensors is always ensured. Results on real clinical data demonstrate the truthfulness of the proposed approach and show promising improvements of fiber tracking in the brain and the spinal cord.

[1]  N. Ayache,et al.  Log‐Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  J. Hiriart-Urruty,et al.  Convex analysis and minimization algorithms , 1993 .

[3]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  Rician Noise Removal in Diffusion Tensor MRI , 2006, MICCAI.

[4]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Formal characterization and extension of the linearized diffusion tensor model , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Maher Moakher,et al.  A rigorous framework for diffusion tensor calculus , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Zhizhou Wang,et al.  A constrained variational principle for direct estimation and smoothing of the diffusion tensor field from complex DWI , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  N. Ayache,et al.  Joint Estimation and Smoothing of Clinical DT-MRI with a Log-Euclidean Metric , 2005 .

[8]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Fast and Simple Calculus on Tensors in the Log-Euclidean Framework , 2005, MICCAI.

[9]  A. Anderson Theoretical analysis of the effects of noise on diffusion tensor imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Analysis Tool for Diffusion Tensor MRI , 2003, MICCAI.

[11]  N. Ayache,et al.  Clinical DT-MRI Estimation, Smoothing, and Fiber Tracking With Log-Euclidean Metrics , 2007 .

[12]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Statistics on the Manifold of Multivariate Normal Distributions: Theory and Application to Diffusion Tensor MRI Processing , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[13]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI , 2002, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Fiber Tracking in q-Ball Fields Using Regularized Particle Trajectories , 2005, IPMI.

[15]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[17]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance image regularization , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  S. Skare,et al.  Noise considerations in the determination of diffusion tensor anisotropy. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  RESTORE: Robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[21]  P. Fillard,et al.  MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Constrained Flows of Matrix-Valued Functions: Application to Diffusion Tensor Regularization , 2002, ECCV.

[23]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal Geodesic Analysis on Symmetric Spaces: Statistics of Diffusion Tensors , 2004, ECCV Workshops CVAMIA and MMBIA.

[24]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  A Riemannian Framework for Tensor Computing , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  O. Faugeras,et al.  Statistics on Multivariate Normal Distributions: A Geometric Approach and its Application to Diffusion Tensor MRI , 2004 .

[26]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  DT-MRI estimation, regularization and fiber tractography , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).