Promoter engineering: Recent advances in controlling transcription at the most fundamental level

Synthetic control of gene expression is critical for metabolic engineering efforts. Specifically, precise control of key pathway enzymes (heterologous or native) can help maximize product formation. The fundamental level of transcriptional control takes place at promoter elements that drive gene expression. Endogenous promoters are limited in that they do not fully sample the complete continuum of transcriptional control, and do not maximize the transcription levels achievable within an organism. To address this issue, several attempts at promoter engineering have shown great promise both in expanding the cell‐wide transcriptional capacity of an organism and in enabling tunable levels of gene expression. Thus, this review highlights the recent advances and approaches for altering gene expression control at the promoter level. Furthermore, we propose that recent advances in the understanding of transcription factors and their DNA‐binding sites will enable rational and predictive control of gene expression.

[1]  J. Keasling Manufacturing Molecules Through Metabolic Engineering , 2010, Science.

[2]  M. Johnston,et al.  Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[3]  Christina D. Smolke,et al.  Synthetic RNA modules for fine-tuning gene expression levels in yeast by modulating RNase III activity , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  J. Bailey,et al.  Toward a science of metabolic engineering , 1991, Science.

[6]  Hal Alper,et al.  Tuning Gene Expression in Yarrowia lipolytica by a Hybrid Promoter Approach , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  F. Dietrich,et al.  Mapping of transcription start sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 5′ SAGE , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Barry L. Wanner,et al.  Use of New Methods for Construction of Tightly Regulated Arabinose and Rhamnose Promoter Fusions in Studies of theEscherichia coli Phosphate Regulon , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  Nathan Crook,et al.  Linking Yeast Gcn5p Catalytic Function and Gene Regulation Using a Quantitative, Graded Dominant Mutant Approach , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Thomas Jeffries,et al.  Shuffling of Promoters for Multiple Genes To Optimize Xylose Fermentation in an Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  Rishi Garg,et al.  Controlling promoter strength and regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic hybrid promoters , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  D. Belin,et al.  Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  J. Beckerich,et al.  Heterologous protein expression and secretion in the non-conventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: a review. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[14]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for high-level production of isoprenoids. , 2007, Metabolic engineering.

[15]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. , 2009, Genome research.

[16]  D. Bushnell,et al.  Structure of an RNA Polymerase II–TFIIB Complex and the Transcription Initiation Mechanism , 2010, Science.

[17]  D. Michel Fine tuning gene expression through short DNA-protein binding cycles. , 2009, Biochimie.

[18]  E. Nevoigt,et al.  Progress in Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[19]  M Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment in yeast is influenced by promoter architecture and downstream sequences. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  T. Kodaki,et al.  Construction of strong mammalian promoters by random cis-acting element elongation. , 2007, BioTechniques.

[21]  M. Hatashita,et al.  Generation of a strong promoter for Escherichia coli from eukaryotic genome DNA. , 2005, Journal of biotechnology.

[22]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  Synthetic promoter libraries--tuning of gene expression. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  C. Elvin,et al.  Modified bacteriophage lambda promoter vectors for overproduction of proteins in Escherichia coli. , 1990, Gene.

[24]  Kathleen A. Curran,et al.  Expanding the chemical palate of cells by combining systems biology and metabolic engineering. , 2012, Metabolic engineering.

[25]  J. Bassel,et al.  Genetic Order of the Galactose Structural Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1971, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  SCPD: a promoter database of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Bioinform..

[27]  C. Gaillardin,et al.  Two upstream activation sequences control the expression of the XPR2 gene in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  R. Müller,et al.  Chimeric transcriptional control units for improved liver-specific transgene expression. , 2003, Gene.

[29]  Hal S. Alper,et al.  Re-engineering multicloning sites for function and convenience , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  Christina D Smolke,et al.  A synthetic library of RNA control modules for predictable tuning of gene expression in yeast , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[31]  S. Aiyar,et al.  Escherichia coli Promoters with UP Elements of Different Strengths: Modular Structure of Bacterial Promoters , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  Karin Kovar,et al.  Promoter library designed for fine-tuned gene expression in Pichia pastoris , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  H. Alper,et al.  Systems metabolic engineering: Genome‐scale models and beyond , 2010, Biotechnology journal.

[34]  Mathieu Blanchette,et al.  PReMod: a database of genome-wide mammalian cis-regulatory module predictions , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  Alyssa M. Redding,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of n-butanol , 2008, Microbial cell factories.

[36]  A 28-bp segment of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 upstream activator sequence confers phosphate control to the CYC1-lacZ gene fusion. , 1988, Gene.

[37]  S. Hahn,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Transcription Factor Regulation and Function, Mechanisms of Initiation, and Roles of Activators and Coactivators , 2011, Genetics.

[38]  L. Guarente,et al.  Each of three "TATA elements" specifies a subset of the transcription initiation sites at the CYC-1 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  A. Burgard,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1,4-butanediol. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[40]  Peter Ruhdal Jensen,et al.  Modulation of Gene Expression Made Easy , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[41]  J. Dunn,et al.  Cloning and expression of the gene for bacteriophage T 7 RNA polymerase , 2022 .

[42]  L. Comstock,et al.  The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  D. Michel How transcription factors can adjust the gene expression floodgates. , 2010, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[44]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering promoter regulation , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[45]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Response to Hammer et al.: Tuning genetic control--importance of thorough promoter characterization versus generating promoter diversity. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[46]  M. Penttilä,et al.  Xylose-metabolizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains overexpressing the TKL1 and TAL1 genes encoding the pentose phosphate pathway enzymes transketolase and transaldolase , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[47]  J. Keasling,et al.  Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[48]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Reconstruction of a bacterial isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, FEBS letters.

[49]  James M Clomburg,et al.  Biofuel production in Escherichia coli: the role of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[50]  M. Holland,et al.  Isolation and identification of yeast messenger ribonucleic acids coding for enolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and phosphoglycerate kinase. , 1978, Biochemistry.

[51]  J. Brosius,et al.  Spacing of the -10 and -35 regions in the tac promoter. Effect on its in vivo activity. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[52]  E. Siggia,et al.  Analysis of Combinatorial cis-Regulation in Synthetic and Genomic Promoters , 2008, Nature.

[53]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Responses of Four Yeast Genes to Changes in the Transcriptional Machinery Are Determined by Their Promoters , 2002, Current Biology.

[54]  N. D. Da Silva,et al.  Introduction and expression of genes for metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, FEMS yeast research.

[55]  J. Liao,et al.  Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels , 2008, Nature.

[56]  K. Hammer,et al.  The Sequence of Spacers between the Consensus Sequences Modulates the Strength of Prokaryotic Promoters , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[57]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  The level of glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase activity strongly influences xylose fermentation and inhibitor sensitivity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains , 2003, Yeast.

[58]  C. Madzak,et al.  Strong hybrid promoters and integrative expression/secretion vectors for quasi-constitutive expression of heterologous proteins in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. , 2000, Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology.

[59]  Wei E Huang,et al.  When single cell technology meets omics, the new toolbox of analytical biotechnology is emerging. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[60]  P. Ebert,et al.  Functional promoter analysis using an approach based on an in vitro evolution strategy. , 2005, BioTechniques.

[61]  M. Holland,et al.  Structural comparison of two nontandemly repeated yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[62]  M. Ciriacy,et al.  Identification of novel HXT genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals the impact of individual hexose transporters on qlycolytic flux , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[63]  James T Kadonaga,et al.  Rational design of a super core promoter that enhances gene expression , 2006, Nature Methods.

[64]  S. Lee,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of polylactic acid and its copolymers , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[65]  Jo Maertens,et al.  Construction and model-based analysis of a promoter library for E. coli: an indispensable tool for metabolic engineering , 2007, BMC biotechnology.

[66]  A. Skerra Use of the tetracycline promoter for the tightly regulated production of a murine antibody fragment in Escherichia coli. , 1994, Gene.

[67]  L. Guarente,et al.  Distinctly regulated tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae , 1984, Cell.

[68]  A. Gatignol,et al.  Cloning of Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters using a probe vector based on phleomycin resistance. , 1990, Gene.

[69]  Peter Ruhdal Jensen,et al.  A synthetic promoter library for constitutive gene expression in Lactobacillus plantarum. , 2006, Microbiology.

[70]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.

[71]  A. Bogdanove,et al.  TAL Effectors: Customizable Proteins for DNA Targeting , 2011, Science.

[72]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  H. Baker,et al.  Activation mechanism of the multifunctional transcription factor repressor-activator protein 1 (Rap1p) , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[74]  D. K. Hawley,et al.  Compilation and analysis of Escherichia coli promoter DNA sequences. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[75]  James T Kadonaga,et al.  Perspectives on the RNA polymerase II core promoter , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology.

[76]  Jack T. Pronk,et al.  Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Efficient Anaerobic Alcoholic Fermentation of l-Arabinose , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[77]  J. Woolford,et al.  Tripartite upstream promoter element essential for expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal protein genes , 1986, Molecular and cellular biology.

[78]  K. Terpe Overview of bacterial expression systems for heterologous protein production: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[79]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[80]  Joseph B Hiatt,et al.  Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[81]  C. Gross,et al.  Assay of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: sigma-core interactions. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[82]  J. T. Kadonaga,et al.  The RNA polymerase II core promoter. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[83]  Chaoying Yu,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for biotechnological production of high-value organic acids and alcohols , 2011, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[84]  B. D. Kulkarni,et al.  On the consensus structure within the E. coli promoters. , 1994, Biophysical chemistry.

[85]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Identifying Functionally Important Mutations from Phenotypically Diverse Sequence Data , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[86]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering of Promoter Replacement Cassettes for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[87]  Guillermo Gosset,et al.  Coutilization of glucose and glycerol enhances the production of aromatic compounds in an Escherichia coli strain lacking the phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase system , 2008, Microbial cell factories.

[88]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Rational Diversification of a Promoter Providing Fine-Tuned Expression and Orthogonal Regulation for Synthetic Biology , 2012, PloS one.

[89]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[90]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  Generation of a synthetic mammalian promoter library by modification of sequences spacing transcription factor binding sites. , 2002, Gene.

[91]  H. Alper,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Tools to Design, Build, and Optimize Cellular Processes , 2010, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[92]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast , 2006, Nature.

[93]  B. G. Adams Induction of Galactokinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Kinetics of Induction and Glucose Effects , 1972, Journal of bacteriology.

[94]  F. Studier,et al.  Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[95]  L. Guarente,et al.  Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  L. Guarente,et al.  A GAL10-CYC1 hybrid yeast promoter identifies the GAL4 regulatory region as an upstream site. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[97]  P. Cramer,et al.  RNA polymerase II–TFIIB structure and mechanism of transcription initiation , 2009, Nature.

[98]  Vivek K. Mutalik,et al.  Predicting strength and function for promoters of the Escherichia coli alternative sigma factor, σE , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Innovation at the intersection of synthetic and systems biology. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[100]  J. Collins,et al.  DIVERSITY-BASED, MODEL-GUIDED CONSTRUCTION OF SYNTHETIC GENE NETWORKS WITH PREDICTED FUNCTIONS , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[101]  Kevin M. Smith,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for 1-butanol production. , 2008, Metabolic engineering.

[102]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[103]  Alexandre P. Francisco,et al.  YEASTRACT-DISCOVERER: new tools to improve the analysis of transcriptional regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[104]  Michael Hampsey,et al.  Molecular Genetics of the RNA Polymerase II General Transcriptional Machinery , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[105]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  EcoCyc: a comprehensive database resource for Escherichia coli , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[106]  H. Baker,et al.  The role of Gcr1p in the transcriptional activation of glycolytic genes in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1997, Genetics.

[107]  J. Collins,et al.  Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[108]  J. T. Kadonaga,et al.  The RNA polymerase II core promoter - the gateway to transcription. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[109]  K. Murakami,et al.  Bacterial RNA polymerases: the wholo story. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.