Should Internet Researchers Use Ill-Gotten Information?

This paper describes how the ethical problems raised by scientific data obtained through harmful and immoral conduct (which, following Stan Godlovitch, is called ill-gotten information) may also emerge in cases where data is collected from the Internet. It describes the major arguments for and against using ill-gotten information in research, and shows how they may be applied to research that either collects information about the Internet itself or which uses data from questionable or unknown sources on the Internet. Three examples (the Internet Census 2012, the PharmaLeaks study, and research into keylogger dropzones) demonstrate how researchers address the ethical issues raised by the sources of data that they use and how the existing arguments concerning the use of ill-gotten information apply to Internet research. The problems faced by researchers who collect or use data from the Internet are shown to be the same problems faced by researchers in other fields who may obtain or use ill-gotten information.

[1]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  An internet census taken by an illegal botnet: a qualitative assessment of published measurements , 2014, CCRV.

[2]  Manish Karir,et al.  The Internet Census 2012 Dataset: An Ethical Examination , 2015, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[3]  Felix C. Freiling,et al.  Learning More about the Underground Economy: A Case-Study of Keyloggers and Dropzones , 2009, ESORICS.

[4]  Joan E. Sieber,et al.  Planning Ethically Responsible Research , 1992 .

[5]  M. Zimmer.  “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[6]  H. Beecher,et al.  Ethics and clinical research. , 1966, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Daisuke Inoue,et al.  The Carna Botnet Through the Lens of a Network Telescope , 2013, FPS.

[8]  A. Rosenbaum.  The use of Nazi medical experimentation data: memorial or betrayal? , 1989, The International journal of applied philosophy.

[9]  Anna Sperotto,et al.  Towards Validation of the Internet Census 2012 , 2014, EUNICE.

[10]  L W Bivens,et al.  Responsible conduct of research. , 1991, ASHA.

[11]  K. Moe.  Should the Nazi research data be cited? , 1984, The Hastings Center report.

[12]  J. Nie.  The United States Cover-up of Japanese Wartime Medical Atrocities: Complicity Committed in the National Interest and Two Proposals for Contemporary Action , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[13]  Robert M Martin,et al.  Using Nazi Scientific Data , 1986, Dialogue.

[14]  Robert L. Berger,et al.  Nazi science--the Dachau hypothermia experiments. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Godlovitch.  Forbidding Nasty Knowledge: On the Use of Ill–gotten Information , 1997 .

[16]  D. Resnik.  The ethics of science: An introduction , 2005 .

[17]  C. Quinn.  Taking seriously victims of unethical experiments: Susan Brison's conception of the self and its relevance to bioethics. , 2000, Journal of Social Philosophy.

[18]  K. Crawford,et al.  Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[19]  Sissela Bok,et al.  Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation , 1982 .

[20]  Mark Allman,et al.  Ethical considerations in network measurement papers , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[21]  Peter Mostow,et al.  “Like Building on Top of Auschwitz”: On the Symbolic Meaning of Using Data from the Nazi Experiments, and on Non-Use as a Form of Memorial , 1993, Journal of Law and Religion.

[22]  A. Schafer.  On Using Nazi Data: The Case Against , 1986, Dialogue.