COVID-19 and the Gendered Use of Emojis on Twitter: Infodemiology Study

Background The online discussion around the COVID-19 pandemic is multifaceted, and it is important to examine the different ways by which online users express themselves. Since emojis are used as effective vehicles to convey ideas and sentiments, they can offer important insight into the public’s gendered discourses about the pandemic. Objective This study aims at exploring how people of different genders (eg, men, women, and sex and gender minorities) are discussed in relation to COVID-19 through the study of Twitter emojis. Methods We collected over 50 million tweets referencing the hashtags #Covid-19 and #Covid19 for a period of more than 2 months in early 2020. Using a mixed method, we extracted three data sets containing tweets that reference men, women, and sexual and gender minorities, and we then analyzed emoji use along each gender category. We identified five major themes in our analysis including morbidity fears, health concerns, employment and financial issues, praise for frontline workers, and unique gendered emoji use. The top 600 emojis were manually classified based on their sentiment, indicating how positive, negative, or neutral each emoji is and studying their use frequencies. Results The findings indicate that the majority of emojis are overwhelmingly positive in nature along the different genders, but sexual and gender minorities, and to a lesser extent women, are discussed more negatively than men. There were also many differences alongside discourses of men, women, and gender minorities when certain topics were discussed, such as death, financial and employment matters, gratitude, and health care, and several unique gendered emojis were used to express specific issues like community support. Conclusions Emoji research can shed light on the gendered impacts of COVID-19, offering researchers an important source of information on health crises as they happen in real time.

[1]  Philip A. Thompsen,et al.  Effects of Pictographs and Quoting on Flaming in Electronic Mail. , 1996 .

[2]  Landra L. Rezabek,et al.  Visual Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication: Supplementing Text with Emoticons , 1998 .

[3]  Alecia Wolf,et al.  Emotional Expression Online: Gender Differences in Emoticon Use , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  David A. Huffaker,et al.  Gender, Identity, and Language Use in Teenage Blogs , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Daantje Derks,et al.  Emoticons and Online Message Interpretation , 2008 .

[6]  G. Breukelen Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) , 2010 .

[7]  Jessica Martucci Negotiating Exclusion , 2010, Social studies of science.

[8]  Barry Kavanagh A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Japanese and English Non-Verbal Online Communication: The Use of Emoticons in Weblogs , 2010 .

[9]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Face-to-face communication over the Internet: emotions in a web of culture, language, and technology , 2011 .

[10]  Tom W. Smith Cross-National Differences in Attitudes towards Homosexuality , 2011 .

[11]  Clayton Shepard,et al.  A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  H. Hwang Gender Differences in Emoticon Use on Mobile Text Messaging: Evidence from a Korean Sample , 2014 .

[13]  M. Cha,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparison of Nonverbal Cues in Emoticons on Twitter: Evidence from Big Data Analysis , 2014 .

[14]  K. Crawford,et al.  The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication , 2015 .

[15]  S. Diallo,et al.  You Are What You Tweet: Connecting the Geographic Variation in America’s Obesity Rate to Twitter Content , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  Petra Kralj Novak,et al.  Sentiment of Emojis , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Y. Nishimura A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF EMOTICON USAGE IN JAPANESE BLOGS: VARIATION BY AGE, GENDER, AND TOPIC , 2015 .

[18]  B. Bennett,et al.  A gendered human rights analysis of Ebola and Zika: locating gender in global health emergencies , 2016 .

[19]  Hamza Alshenqeeti Are Emojis Creating a New or Old Visual Language for New Generations? A Socio-semiotic Study , 2016 .

[20]  K. Gallo Understanding children’s food-related emotions using words and emojis in the United States and Ghana , 2016 .

[21]  S. Harman Ebola, gender and conspicuously invisible women in global health governance , 2016 .

[22]  Lifen Cheng ¿Digo lo que siento y siento lo que digo? Una aproximación transcultural al uso de los emoticonos y emojis en los mensajes en CMC , 2017 .

[23]  Xuanzhe Liu,et al.  Through a Gender Lens: Learning Usage Patterns of Emojis from Large-Scale Android Users , 2017, WWW.

[24]  M. Danesi The Semiotics of Emoji , 2017 .

[25]  R. Wegerif,et al.  The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet , 2017 .

[26]  Kohske Takahashi,et al.  Is ☺ Smiling? Cross-Cultural Study on Recognition of Emoticon’s Emotion , 2017 .

[27]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Sentiment Analysis of Health Care Tweets: Review of the Methods Used , 2018, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[28]  S. Diallo,et al.  Temporal and spatiotemporal investigation of tourist attraction visit sentiment on Twitter , 2018, PloS one.

[29]  Marília Prada,et al.  Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[30]  Francisco Javier González-Castaño,et al.  Creating emoji lexica from unsupervised sentiment analysis of their descriptions , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Xuanzhe Liu,et al.  Through a Gender Lens: Learning Usage Patterns of Emojis from Large-Scale Android Users , 2017, WWW.

[32]  Nazia Kalsoom,et al.  Semiotic Representation of Gender in Google Emojis: A Liberal Feminist Perspective , 2019, Linguistics and Literature Review.

[33]  Yiyi Yang Are you emoji savvy? Exploring nonverbal communication through emojis , 2019, Communication Teacher.

[34]  J. Klugman,et al.  Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health , 2019, The Lancet.

[35]  Julia Smith Overcoming the ‘tyranny of the urgent’: integrating gender into disease outbreak preparedness and response , 2019, Gender & Development.

[36]  R. Morgan,et al.  COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak , 2020, The Lancet.

[37]  Ahmed Al-Rawi,et al.  Bots as Active News Promoters: A Digital Analysis of COVID-19 Tweets , 2020, Inf..

[38]  Helen Hockx-Yu Invisible women, data bias in a world designed for men , 2020, Internet Histories.

[39]  K. Church,et al.  Reproductive health under COVID-19 – challenges of responding in a global crisis , 2020, Sexual and reproductive health matters.

[40]  Jian-min Jin,et al.  Gender Differences in Patients With COVID-19: Focus on Severity and Mortality , 2020, Frontiers in Public Health.

[41]  V. Capraro,et al.  The effect of messaging and gender on intentions to wear a face covering to slow down COVID-19 transmission , 2020, 2005.05467.

[42]  Yanty Wirza,et al.  The Difference in Emoji Usage Between Genders , 2020 .

[43]  D. Clements Project , 2003, about.

[44]  Krippendorff’s Alpha , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.