Workflow analysis with communication norms

The language/action perspective (LAP) as orginally introduced by Winograd and Flores has inspired several tools and information system design methodologies. The goal of this article is to make the communication norms underlying various LAP workflow loop models (DEMO, ActionWorkflow) explicit and to contrast them with the auditing norms of internal control. It appears that the communicative action paradigm embedded in DEMO and the customer satisfaction orientation of ActionWorkflow lead to norms which resemble the ones required by internal control, but there are some important differences. For that reason, we propose an extended workflow loop model that distinguishes between customer relations and agency relations. Whereas current LAP approaches do not take agency relations explicitly into account, the extended workflow loop model allows us to analyze the effects of delegation on communicative processes. A framework is offered for the normative analysis of workflows based on a number of formalized communication norms.

[1]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[2]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  Schematic evaluation of internal accounting control systems , 1992 .

[3]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[4]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Towards a Semiotic Communications Quality Model , 2001, Organizational Semiotics.

[5]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Cross-organizational workflow integration using contracts , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Communication diagnosis of a financial service process , 2002 .

[7]  Terry Winograd,et al.  The action workflow approach to workflow management technology , 1992, CSCW '92.

[8]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[9]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  The atoms, molecules and fibers of organizations , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[10]  L. Suchman Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered , 1993 .

[11]  Ronald K. Stamper,et al.  New directions for systems analysis and design , 2000 .

[12]  Richard Sotto Rethinking the theory of organizational communication, how to read an organization: by James R. Taylor (Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing, 1993), 302 pp. , 1996 .

[13]  Dragos Manolescu,et al.  Production workflow: concepts and techniques , 2001, SOEN.

[14]  F. C. P. Motta The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[15]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms , 2002 .

[16]  Sandra Donaldson Dewitz,et al.  Contracting on a performative network: using information technology as a legal intermediary , 1992 .

[17]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  Completing the Loops , 1995 .

[18]  WeigandHans,et al.  Cross-organizational workflow integration using contracts , 2002 .

[19]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Do categories have politics? , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1999 .

[21]  Terry Winograd,et al.  The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology , 1993, Inf. Soc..