The horizontal effect in suppression: Anisotropic overlay and surround suppression at high and low speeds

When a pattern of broad spatial content is viewed by an observer, the multiple spatial components in the pattern stimulate detecting-mechanisms that suppress each other. This suppression is anisotropic, being relatively greater at horizontal, and least at obliques (the "horizontal effect"). Here, suppression of a grating by a naturalistic (1/f) broadband mask is shown to be larger when the broadband masks are temporally similar to the target's temporal properties, and generally anisotropic, with the anisotropy present across all spatio-temporal parings tested. We also show that both suppression from within the region of the test pattern (overlay suppression) and from outside of this region (surround suppression) show the horizontal-effect anisotropy. We conclude that these suppression effects stem from locally-tuned and anisotropically-weighted gain-control pools.

[1]  Massimiliano Di Luca,et al.  Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[2]  D. Alais,et al.  Orientation bandwidths are invariant across spatiotemporal frequency after isotropic components are removed. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[3]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Mechanisms underlying cross-orientation suppression in cat visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Jun-ichiro Kawahara,et al.  Contextual cueing effect in three-dimensional layouts , 2010 .

[5]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[6]  R. Hess,et al.  Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system , 1985, Vision Research.

[8]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Frequency Tuning of the Flicker Motion Aftereffect , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  R. Freeman,et al.  Origins of cross-orientation suppression in the visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Kenneth Hailston,et al.  Ambient sounds can enhance visual perception and memory performance in virtual environments , 2010 .

[11]  T. Meese,et al.  Cross-orientation masking is speed invariant between ocular pathways but speed dependent within them. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[12]  C. Tyler,et al.  Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Bruce C. Hansen,et al.  Anisotropic local contrast normalization: The role of stimulus orientation and spatial frequency bandwidths in the oblique and horizontal effect perceptual anisotropies , 2006, Vision Research.

[14]  C. Tyler,et al.  Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: flanker orientation effects. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[15]  C. Tyler,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interaction fields of flankers revealed by contrast-masking functions. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[16]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Collinear facilitation is largely uncertainty reduction. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[17]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: Modeling nonlinearity and adaptation in cortical neurons , 2002 .

[18]  S. Klein,et al.  Cross- and iso- oriented surrounds modulate the contrast response function: the effect of surround contrast. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[19]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Capacity limits in the detection and identification of change have implications for models of visual short term memory , 2010 .

[20]  M. Carandini,et al.  Masking by fast gratings. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[21]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Individual differences in enhancement and suppression effects , 1993, Vision Research.

[22]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[23]  Edward A Essock,et al.  A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[24]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  The effect of contrast adaptation on briefly presented stimuli , 1995, Vision Research.

[25]  B. Khang,et al.  Apparent Swinging Motion from a 2-D Sinusoidal Pattern , 2000, Perception.

[26]  E. Essock,et al.  An anisotropy of orientation-tuned suppression that matches the anisotropy of typical natural scenes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[27]  Bruce C. Hansen,et al.  Illusory Bands in Orientation and Spatial Frequency: A Cortical Analog to Mach Bands , 2007, Perception.

[28]  Shama C. Akhtar,et al.  The contribution of 3-D object height and density to altitude maintenance in low-altitude flight , 2004 .

[29]  R. Hess,et al.  Estimating multiple temporal mechanisms in human vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[30]  T. Meese,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision , 2007, Neuroscience.

[31]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function , 2002 .

[32]  Edward A. Essock,et al.  Oblique stimuli are seen best (not worst!) in naturalistic broad-band stimuli: a horizontal effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[33]  Edward A. Essock,et al.  Influence of scale and orientation on the visual perception of natural scenes , 2005 .

[34]  A. B. Bonds.  Temporal dynamics of contrast gain in single cells of the cat striate cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[35]  Matteo Carandini,et al.  Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  D. Alais,et al.  Evidence for two interacting temporal channels in human visual processing , 2006, Vision Research.

[38]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Obtaining features for the recognition of human movement style , 2010 .

[39]  T. Meese,et al.  Contextual modulation involves suppression and facilitation from the center and the surround. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[40]  M. B. Mandler,et al.  A three channel model of temporal frequency perception , 1984, Vision Research.

[41]  R F Hess,et al.  Temporal detection in human vision: dependence on spatial frequency. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  Bruce C. Hansen,et al.  Perceptual anisotropies in visual processing and their relation to natural image statistics , 2003, Network.

[43]  R. F. Hess,et al.  Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation , 1992, Vision Research.

[44]  E. Lo.  GAUSSIAN ERROR PROPAGATION APPLIED TO ECOLOGICAL DATA: POST‐ICE‐STORM‐DOWNED WOODY BIOMASS , 2005 .

[45]  S. McKee,et al.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[46]  M. Ernst.  Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[47]  T. Meese,et al.  Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Temporal sensitivity of human luminance pattern mechanisms determined by masking with temporally modulated stimuli , 1999, Vision Research.

[49]  K. Mullen,et al.  Cross-orientation masking in human color vision. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[50]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.