Arabic digit processing in adults with mathematical learning disability

The processing of Arabic digits is a core difficulty of children suffering from mathematical learning disability (MLD). Dominant accounts assume a semantic impairment affecting either the magnitude representation per se or its access from numerical symbols. But recent data have raised the hypothesis that the impaired processing of Arabic digits may be explained by a selective deficit of digit visual recognition (i.e., recognising a symbol as one of the digits, no matter its identity or numerical meaning). This study aims at testing whether the difficulty to process Arabic digits remains prevalent in adults with MLD and whether it is effectively associated with a digit visual recognition deficit. To do so, we compared 19 adults with MLD to 19 matched controls in an Arabic digit comparison task that required to identify the largest of two digits, and in an Arabic digit lexical decision task that required to decide whether a visual stimulus is a digit or not. The results showed that MLD participants took more time than control participants to perform the comparison task. In contrast, their performance in the digit lexical decision task was within the range of the control participants. Overall, this finding indicates that adults with MLD continue to experience difficulties to process the magnitude of Arabic digits efficiently, and this cannot be explained by a visual recognition deficit for Arabic digits. We conclude that their difficulties are best explained by an impaired representation of number magnitude or by an impaired access to this representation.

[1]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Numerals do not need numerosities: robust evidence for distinct numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic numbers , 2020, Psychological Research.

[2]  Xinlin Zhou,et al.  Dyslexia and dyscalculia are characterized by common visual perception deficits , 2018, Developmental neuropsychology.

[3]  George K. Georgiou,et al.  Do Chinese Children With Math Difficulties Have a Deficit in Executive Functioning? , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Anne Lafay,et al.  Impairment of Arabic- and Spoken-Number Processing in Children With Mathematical Learning Disability , 2018, J. Numer. Cogn..

[5]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Bayesian inference for psychology . Part , 2018 .

[6]  Heinz Holling,et al.  (Non-)symbolic magnitude processing in children with mathematical difficulties: A meta-analysis. , 2017, Research in developmental disabilities.

[7]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The Symbol Grounding Problem Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the ANS Mapping Account and the Proposal of an Alternative Account Based on Symbol–Symbol Associations , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[8]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Shared versus separate processes for letter and digit identification , 2014, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  Karin Landerl,et al.  Development of numerical processing in children with typical and dyscalculic arithmetic skills—a longitudinal study , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Wim Fias,et al.  Multiple components of developmental dyscalculia , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[11]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[12]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System , 2013, Psychological science.

[13]  Alice De Visscher,et al.  A case study of arithmetic facts dyscalculia caused by a hypersensitivity-to-interference in memory , 2013, Cortex.

[14]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Profiles of Dyscalculia: An Explanation Based on a Double Exact-and-Approximate Number Representation Model , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[17]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). , 2011, Child development.

[18]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[19]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[20]  Susan Carey,et al.  Where Our Number Concepts Come From. , 2009, The journal of philosophy.

[21]  Karin Landerl,et al.  Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Developmental Dyscalculia: heterogeneity might not mean different mechanisms , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Core information processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia and low numeracy. , 2008, Developmental science.

[24]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. , 2008, Child development.

[25]  Wim Fias,et al.  Priming reveals differential coding of symbolic and non-symbolic quantities , 2007, Cognition.

[26]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[27]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: a study of developmental dyscalculia. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[28]  S. Censabella,et al.  The Inhibition of Exogenous Distracting Information in Children with Learning Disabilities , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[29]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students , 2004, Cognition.

[30]  D. Geary Mathematics and Learning Disabilities , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[31]  Susan Carey,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis , 2001 .

[32]  O Manor,et al.  Developmental Dyscalculia Is a Familial Learning Disability , 2001, Journal of learning disabilities.

[33]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Number Processing and Calculation in A Case of Visual Agnosia , 2000, Cortex.

[34]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Numerical and arithmetical cognition: a longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  H. Prosper Bayesian Analysis , 2000, hep-ph/0006356.

[36]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[37]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  Anna J. Wilson,et al.  Dyscalculia and dyslexia in adults: Cognitive bases of comorbidity , 2015 .

[39]  M. Carter Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. , 2014 .

[40]  D. Wechsler WAIS-IV - Échelle d'intelligence de Wechsler pour adultes , 2010 .

[41]  R. Shalev,et al.  Developmental dyscalculia: prevalence and prognosis , 2009, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[42]  K. Sullivan Remediation of arabic numeral processing in a case of developmental dyscalculia. , 1996, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[43]  C. Temple Digit dyslexia: A Category-specific disorder in development dyscalculia , 1989 .