Bilateral monopoly, identical distributors, and game-theoretic analyses of distribution channels

Game-theoretic analyses of distribution channels have generated six widely held beliefs (we call them Channel Hypotheses) whose universal soundness has not been examined. To assess the validity of these Hypotheses, we develop a general, linear-demand model in which distributors face heterogeneity in demand, heterogeneity in costs, and any degree of intensity of inter-distributor competition. For ease of comparison, we nest the bilateral-monopoly model and the identical-distributors model within our general model. Our analysis reveals that the Channel Hypotheses do not generalize beyond the specific game-theoretic models from which they were derived. This lack of generality is critical, because these beliefs have led to intuitively appealing (but inadvertently misleading) strategic advice for managers and modeling advice for game theorists. From our general, linear-demand model, we derive six Channel Propositions that correct these accumulated errors of conceptualization and that generate a richer, more broadly applicable set of managerial and modeling implications. We also present a Channel-Modeling Proposition that we believe will help modelers avoid the errors of conceptualization described in this paper.

[1]  F. Y. Edgeworth Papers Relating To Political Economy , 1925 .

[2]  H. Stackelberg,et al.  Marktform und Gleichgewicht , 1935 .

[3]  J. Spengler Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Heinrich von Stackelberg,et al.  Stackelberg (Heinrich von) - The Theory of the Market Economy, translated from the German and with an introduction by Alan T. PEACOCK. , 1953 .

[5]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Comment---Managing Channel Profits: Comment , 1987 .

[6]  K. B. Monroe Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions , 1990 .

[7]  Francine Lafontaine,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL LOOK AT FRANCHISE CONTRACTS AS SIGNALING DEVICES , 1990 .

[8]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer , 1991 .

[9]  Francine Lafontaine Agency Theory and Franchising: Some Empirical Results , 1992 .

[10]  K. Sridhar Moorthy,et al.  Theoretical Modeling in Marketing , 1993 .

[11]  M. Parry,et al.  Channel Coordination When Retailers Compete , 1995 .

[12]  Francine Lafontaine,et al.  Double-Sided Moral Hazard and the Nature of Share Contracts , 1995 .

[13]  James D. Hess,et al.  Pull Promotions and Channel Coordination , 1995 .

[14]  M. Parry,et al.  Coordination and manufacturer profit maximization: The multiple retailer channel , 1995 .

[15]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel , 1996 .

[16]  K. Shaw,et al.  The Dynamics of Franchise Contracting: Evidence from Panel Data , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Sridhar Moorthy,et al.  Managing a distribution channel under asymmetric information with performance requirements , 1997 .

[18]  R. Staelin,et al.  Vertical Strategic Interaction: Implications for Channel Pricing Strategy , 1997 .

[19]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  Manufacturer-Optimal Wholesale Pricing When Retailers Compete , 1998 .

[20]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  Is Channel Coordination All it is Cracked Up to be , 2000 .

[21]  M. Parry,et al.  Mathematical models of distribution channels , 2004 .

[22]  R. Betancourt The Economics of Retailing and Distribution , 2005 .

[23]  F. Y. Edgeworth Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences , 2007 .

[24]  Richard Staelin,et al.  An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[25]  Steven M. Shugan,et al.  Managing Channel Profits , 2008, Mark. Sci..