Noise-Robust Distorted Born Iterative Method with Prior Estimate for Microwave Ablation Monitoring

A noise-robust and accuracy-enhanced microwave imaging algorithm is presented for microwave ablation monitoring of cancer treatment. The ablation impact of dielectric change can be assessed by microwave inverse scattering analysis, where the dimension and dielectric drop of the ablation zone enable safe ablation monitoring. We focus on the distorted Born iterative method (DBIM), which is applicable to highly heterogeneous and contrasted dielectric profiles. As the reconstruction accuracy and convergence speed of DBIM depend largely on the initial estimate of the dielectric profile or noise level, this study exploits a prior estimate of the DBIM for the pre-ablation state to accelerate the convergence speed and introduces the matched-filter-based noise reduction scheme in the DBIM framework. The two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain numerical test with realistic breast phantoms shows that our method significantly enhances the reconstruction accuracy with a lower computational cost. key words: microwave ablation monitoring, microwave imaging, distorted born iterative method (DBIM), noise reduction

[1]  S. Kidera,et al.  Microwave Imaging Algorithm Based on Waveform Reconstruction for Microwave Ablation Treatment , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[2]  M. A. van den Bosch,et al.  MR-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Breast Cancer with a Dedicated Breast Platform , 2013, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[3]  Susan C. Hagness,et al.  Sensitivity of the Distorted Born Iterative Method to the Initial Guess in Microwave Breast Imaging , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[4]  K. McMasters,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Microwave Ablation of Hepatic Tumors: A Prospective Review of a 5-Year Experience , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  Mahta Moghaddam,et al.  Real-Time Three-Dimensional Microwave Monitoring of Interstitial Thermal Therapy , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  W. Jarnagin,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound and tissue elastography measurements do not predict the size of hepatic microwave ablations. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[7]  Marta Cavagnaro,et al.  Changes in the dielectric properties of ex vivo bovine liver during microwave thermal ablation at 2.45 GHz , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Nader Behdad,et al.  Array Sensitivity for Model-Based Microwave Breast Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  Carlo Fugazzola,et al.  Microwave tumors ablation: principles, clinical applications and review of preliminary experiences. , 2008, International journal of surgery.

[10]  Shouhei Kidera,et al.  TDOA-based microwave imaging algorithm for real-time microwave ablation monitoring , 2017, International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies.

[11]  O. Bucci,et al.  Microwave ablation monitoring via microwave tomography: A numerical feasibility assessment , 2016, 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[12]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.