Promising practices for dealing with complexity in research for development

Are there aspects of complexity that are characteristic for research for development projects? Our study shows what are these aspects, how they affect research and what practices seem to be promising for dealing with the increasing levels of complexity.The need to deal with complexity is getting increasingly attention in research for development projects implemented through transboundary research partnerships between organisations from the Global North and the Global South. However, less is known about aspects beyond the systems under study that still affect complexity in the research project. We conducted an experience capitalization of five transboundary research partnerships undertaking research in 14 countries in the Global South. We found that the combination of multiple contexts, the cultural and disciplinary diversity of the transboundary research partnerships, and the set of rules and proceedings from the funding mechanism affect the levels of complexity. We further identified that a transdisciplinary approach and several related practices, like intercultural communication or integrative partnerships, are promising ways of dealing with complexity. Current structures in research for development need to improve in order to fully use the potential of transdisciplinarity for sustainability transformation.

[1]  C. R. Abad,et al.  The role of transdisciplinarity in building a decolonial bridge between science, policy, and practice , 2023, GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society.

[2]  R. Hölsgens,et al.  Transdisciplinary Research along the Logic of Empowerment: Perspectives from Four Urban and Regional Transformation Projects , 2023, Sustainability.

[3]  R. Ison,et al.  Growing a community of conversation and understanding: The 2023 agenda for the systems community , 2022, Systems Research and Behavioral Science.

[4]  C. Robledo-Abad,et al.  Transdisciplinary co-creation increases the utilization of knowledge from sustainable development research , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[5]  Daniel J. Lang,et al.  Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[6]  M. Schlüter,et al.  What are social-ecological systems and social-ecological systems research? , 2021, The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems.

[7]  C. Robledo-Abad,et al.  Factors enhancing the level of utilisation of research knowledge on ecosystems , 2021, PloS one.

[8]  Shelley Kotze,et al.  North‐South research collaborations: An empirical evaluation against principles of transboundary research , 2021, Development Policy Review.

[9]  Cynthia Mitchell,et al.  Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process , 2021 .

[10]  P. Gentili Why is Complexity Science valuable for reaching the goals of the UN 2030 Agenda? , 2021, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali.

[11]  K. Wiesner,et al.  What is a complex system? , 2020, What Is a Complex System?.

[12]  Mirko S. Winkler,et al.  Utilization of research knowledge in sustainable development pathways: Insights from a transdisciplinary research-for-development programme , 2020, Environmental Science & Policy.

[13]  U. Wiesmann,et al.  Addressing sustainability challenges with a broader concept of systems, target, and transformation knowledge , 2019 .

[14]  M. Woermann,et al.  Complexity, philosophy and ethics , 2019, Global Challenges, Governance, and Complexity.

[15]  D. Simon,et al.  Lost in translation: A framework for analysing complexity of co-production settings in relation to epistemic communities, linguistic diversities and culture , 2019, Futures.

[16]  Rika Preiser,et al.  Identifying general trends and patterns in complex systems research: An overview of theoretical and practical implications , 2019, Systems Research and Behavioral Science.

[17]  F. Castellacci,et al.  Transformational Complexity, Systemic Complexity and Economic Development , 2019 .

[18]  John R. Turner,et al.  Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences , 2019, Syst..

[19]  C. Folke,et al.  Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches , 2018 .

[20]  Ann Larson,et al.  Evaluation amidst complexity: Eight evaluation questions to explain how complex adaptive systems affect program impact , 2018, Evaluation.

[21]  M. Palenberg,et al.  Outcomes and Impacts of Development Interventions , 2018 .

[22]  Claes Andersson,et al.  Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity , 2017 .

[23]  T. Pinto-Correia,et al.  Reflecting on Collaborative Research Into the Sustainability of Mediterranean Agriculture: A Case Study Using a Systematization of Experiences Approach , 2017 .

[24]  Tonya Schuetz,et al.  Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based , 2017 .

[25]  È. Gardien Qu’apportent les savoirs expérientiels à la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales ? , 2017 .

[26]  Cynthia Mitchell,et al.  Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research , 2015 .

[27]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Moving the Pendulum Back to the Middle: Reflections on and Introduction to the Inductive Research Special Issue of Journal of Business and Psychology , 2014 .

[28]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Communication and Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research , 2014 .

[29]  D. Stone Beyond Common Ground: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Interdisciplinary Communication and Collaboration , 2014 .

[30]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[31]  Deana D. Pennington,et al.  Transdisciplinary Research, Transformative Learning, and Transformative Science , 2013 .

[32]  Temis G. Taylor,et al.  Complexity and Sustainability , 2013 .

[33]  K. Howe,et al.  Mixed Methods, Triangulation, and Causal Explanation , 2012 .

[34]  Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn,et al.  Structuring complexity for tailoring research contributions to sustainable development: a framework , 2011, Sustainability Science.

[35]  Christopher A. Pohl,et al.  Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[36]  Beate M. W. Ratter,et al.  Human/Nature Interaction in the Anthropocene: Potential of Social-Ecological Systems Analysis , 2008 .

[37]  S. Eigenbrode,et al.  Employing Philosophical Dialogue in Collaborative Science , 2007 .

[38]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[39]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  The devil in the details : asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence , 2001 .

[40]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  A Theory and Methodology of Inductive Learning , 1983, Artif. Intell..

[41]  Marvin C. Ott Mediation as a Method of Conflict Resolution: Two Cases , 1972, International Organization.