Direct Energy Minimization for Super-Resolution on Nonlinear Manifolds

We address the problem of single image super-resolution by exploring the manifold properties. Given a set of low resolution image patches and their corresponding high resolution patches, we assume they respectively reside on two non-linear manifolds that have similar locally-linear structure. This manifold correlation can be realized by a three-layer Markov network that connects performing super-resolution with energy minimization. The main advantage of our approach is that by working directly with the network model, there is no need to actually construct the mappings for the underlying manifolds. To achieve such efficiency, we establish an energy minimization model for the network that directly accounts for the expected property entailed by the manifold assumption. The resulting energy function has two nice properties for super-resolution. First, the function is convex so that the optimization can be efficiently done. Second, it can be shown to be an upper bound of the reconstruction error by our algorithm. Thus, minimizing the energy function automatically guarantees a lower reconstruction error— an important characteristic for promising stable super-resolution results.

[1]  Stephen J. Roberts,et al.  A Sampled Texture Prior for Image Super-Resolution , 2003, NIPS.

[2]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[3]  Frédéric Cao,et al.  Good continuations in digital image level lines , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  David Salesin,et al.  Image Analogies , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Ann B. Lee The Nonlinear Statistics of High-Contrast Patches in Natural Images , 2003 .

[6]  Michal Irani,et al.  Improving resolution by image registration , 1991, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[7]  Hong Chang,et al.  Super-resolution through neighbor embedding , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[8]  Michael Elad,et al.  Fast and robust multiframe super resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Nanning Zheng,et al.  Image hallucination with primal sketch priors , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  Multiframe image restoration and registration , 1984 .

[11]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  Towards a mathematical theory of primal sketch and sketchability , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[12]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Example-Based Super-Resolution , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  Michael Elad,et al.  Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Dante C. Youla,et al.  Generalized Image Restoration by the Method of Alternating Orthogonal Projections , 1978 .

[15]  Shmuel Peleg,et al.  Efficient super-resolution and applications to mosaics , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[16]  Robert L. Stevenson,et al.  Extraction of high-resolution frames from video sequences , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image processing , 1971 .

[18]  Kim Steenstrup Pedersen,et al.  The Nonlinear Statistics of High-Contrast Patches in Natural Images , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  Russell C. Hardie,et al.  Joint MAP registration and high-resolution image estimation using a sequence of undersampled images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[20]  H Stark,et al.  High-resolution image recovery from image-plane arrays, using convex projections. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Limits on super-resolution and how to break them , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[22]  Arthur Fridman,et al.  Mixed Markov models , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.