Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.

PURPOSE To determine the specific acoustic changes that underlie improved vowel intelligibility in clear speech. METHOD Seven acoustic metrics were measured for conversational and clear vowels produced by 12 talkers-6 who previously were found (S. H. Ferguson, 2004) to produce a large clear speech vowel intelligibility effect for listeners with normal hearing identifying vowels in background noise (the big benefit talkers), and 6 who produced no clear speech vowel intelligibility benefit (the no benefit talkers). RESULTS For vowel duration and for certain measures of the overall acoustic vowel space, the change from conversational to clear speech was significantly greater for big benefit talkers than for no benefit talkers. For measures of formant dynamics, in contrast, the clear speech effect was similar for the 2 groups. CONCLUSION These results suggest that acoustic vowel space expansion and large vowel duration increases improve vowel intelligibility. In contrast, changing the dynamic characteristics of vowels seems not to contribute to improved clear speech vowel intelligibility. However, talker variability suggested that improved vowel intelligibility can be achieved using a variety of clear speech strategies, including some apparently not measured here.

[1]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel formant discrimination: towards more ordinary listening conditions. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  K S Helfer,et al.  Auditory and auditory-visual recognition of clear and conversational speech by older adults. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  Philip C. Loizou,et al.  COLEA: A MATLAB software tool for speech analysis , 1998 .

[6]  Peter F Assmann,et al.  Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Maria-Gabriella Di Benedetto Vowel representation: Some observations on temporal and spectral properties of the first formant frequency , 1989 .

[8]  Johan Wouters,et al.  Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics. I. Analysis. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Jean C. Krause,et al.  Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S. Gordon-Salant Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  D. Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S. H. Ferguson,et al.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Diane Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[17]  Jean C. Krause,et al.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  H. Traunmüller Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale , 1990 .

[19]  Zinny S. Bond,et al.  A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech , 1994, Speech Commun..

[20]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[22]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  Richard Wright,et al.  The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. , 1993 .

[25]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics , 1996, Speech Commun..

[26]  J. Perkell,et al.  Economy of effort in different speaking conditions. I. A preliminary study of intersubject differences and modeling issues. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  L. Braida,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing , 1979 .

[32]  B C Moore,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of speech-rate slowing on speech intelligibility in noise using a simulation of cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.