Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L D Braida,et al. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Ann R Bradlow,et al. Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] D Kewley-Port,et al. Vowel formant discrimination: towards more ordinary listening conditions. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] K S Helfer,et al. Auditory and auditory-visual recognition of clear and conversational speech by older adults. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[5] Philip C. Loizou,et al. COLEA: A MATLAB software tool for speech analysis , 1998 .
[6] Peter F Assmann,et al. Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Maria-Gabriella Di Benedetto. Vowel representation: Some observations on temporal and spectral properties of the first formant frequency , 1989 .
[8] Johan Wouters,et al. Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics. I. Analysis. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Jean C. Krause,et al. Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] S. Gordon-Salant. Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] M. Picheny,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[12] D. Kewley-Port,et al. Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] S. Gordon-Salant,et al. Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] S. H. Ferguson,et al. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Diane Kewley-Port,et al. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] B. Lindblom,et al. Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .
[17] Jean C. Krause,et al. Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] H. Traunmüller. Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale , 1990 .
[19] Zinny S. Bond,et al. A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech , 1994, Speech Commun..
[20] J. Hillenbrand,et al. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Björn Lindblom,et al. Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .
[22] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[23] Nina Kraus,et al. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[24] Richard Wright,et al. The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. , 1993 .
[25] David B. Pisoni,et al. Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics , 1996, Speech Commun..
[26] J. Perkell,et al. Economy of effort in different speaking conditions. I. A preliminary study of intersubject differences and modeling issues. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] L. Braida,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[28] J Harrington,et al. Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] N I Durlach,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[30] T. M. Nearey,et al. Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] M. Picheny,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing , 1979 .
[32] B C Moore,et al. Evaluation of the effect of speech-rate slowing on speech intelligibility in noise using a simulation of cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Tessa Bent,et al. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] N I Durlach,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.