The Diffusion of Computerized Crime Mapping in Policing: Linking Research and Practice

In this paper we examine the diffusion of computerized crime mapping drawing upon a more general approach to the ‘diffusion of innovations’ pioneered by Everett Rogers in 1995. We use data from the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) survey and the Crime Mapping Research Center at the National Institute of Justice to define the basic pattern of adoption of computerized crime mapping in larger American police agencies. As we illustrate in our paper, these surveys suggest that larger police agencies have adopted computerized crime mapping at a rapid pace. We supplement these data with a pilot study of adoption of computerized crime mapping that shows a continuing rapid adoption curve through 2001, and that illustrates that crime mapping innovation follows a period of crisis of confidence in standard American police practices. We also find that the widespread adoption of computerized crime mapping follows research evidence regarding the effectiveness of hot spots policing approaches, and is linked strongly to those approaches in police agencies with computerized crime mapping capabilities. Following the diffusion of innovation literature more generally, we show that there is a significant relationship between the likelihood of early adoption of computerized crime mapping and knowledge of research and interaction with the research community.

[1]  R. Martinson,et al.  What works ?-- questions and answers about prison reform , 2006 .

[2]  Luc Anselin,et al.  The Spatial Patterning of County Homicide Rates: An Application of Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis , 1999 .

[3]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  “Situational” Crime Prevention: Theory and Practice , 1980 .

[4]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS: OBSERVATIONS ON THE REVERSE OF DISPLACEMENT , 2006 .

[5]  Jeffrey A. Roth,et al.  Understanding and Preventing Violence , 1992 .

[6]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Building a safer society : strategic approaches to crime prevention , 1996 .

[7]  M. Felson,et al.  Opportunity Makes the Thief Practical theory for crime prevention , 1998 .

[8]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[9]  Patrick R. Gartin,et al.  Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place , 1989 .

[10]  Bret M. Territo,et al.  Crime analysis through computer mapping: By C.B. Block M. Dabdoub, and S. Fregly, Police Executive Research Forum, Washington D.C., 1995, paperback, xiv + 287 pp., US$29.95 (+ $3.75 s and h), ISBN 1-878734-34-2 , 1996 .

[11]  David Weisburd,et al.  Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice? , 2001 .

[12]  S. Presser,et al.  Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context , 1996 .

[13]  David H. Bayley,et al.  Police for the Future , 1994 .

[14]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[15]  Craig D Uchida,et al.  Drugs and crime: evaluating public policy initiatives. , 1994 .

[16]  S. Bushway,et al.  Trajectories of Crime at Places: A Longitudinal Study of Street Segments in the City of Seattle , 2004 .

[17]  Jerry H. Ratcliffe.  Burglary Reduction and the Myth of Displacement , 2002 .

[18]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives , 2006 .

[19]  Dennis W. Roncek,et al.  Schools and Crime , 2000 .

[20]  Alfred Blumstein,et al.  The Crime Drop in America , 2005 .

[21]  J. Chaiken,et al.  The Criminal Investigation Process , 1977 .

[22]  Alexander Weiss.  The communication of innovation in American policing , 1997 .

[23]  George L. Kelling,et al.  The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment : a summary report , 1974 .

[24]  Brandon C. Welsh,et al.  Evidence-Based Crime Prevention , 2002 .

[25]  David Weisburd,et al.  Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention , 1998 .

[26]  Victor Goldsmith,et al.  Analyzing Crime Patterns: Frontiers of Practice , 1999 .

[27]  Alex Hirschfield,et al.  Mapping and Analysing Crime Data : Lessons from Research and Practice , 2001 .

[28]  Stephen D. Mastrofski,et al.  REFORMING TO PRESERVE: COMPSTAT AND STRATEGIC PROBLEM SOLVING IN AMERICAN POLICING* , 2003 .

[29]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime , 2001 .

[30]  R. Clarke.  Situational Crime Prevention: Its Theoretical Basis and Practical Scope , 1983 .

[31]  Liam Downey,et al.  Spatial Measurement, Geography, and Urban Racial Inequality , 2003 .

[32]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Information, apprehension, and deterrence: Exploring the limits of police productivity , 1979 .

[33]  R. Clarke.  Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies , 1992 .

[34]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[35]  D. Weisburd,et al.  Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment , 1995 .

[36]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment , 1999 .

[37]  J. Eck,et al.  What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear? , 2004 .

[38]  George E. Tita,et al.  Diffusion in Homicide: Exploring a General Method for Detecting Spatial Diffusion Processes , 1999 .

[39]  William Spelman,et al.  Calling the police : citizen reporting of serious crime , 1984 .

[40]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial , 1995 .