‘Fit’ for change: measuring designer competence

Abstract A deeper understanding of designers’ core competencies and psychological traits supports both design education and more effective integration of design into industries seeking innovation. The Integral Psychological Profile, an instrumental breakthrough in psychometric testing, measured a group of young designers for core competence and trait ‘fit,’ or ‘compatibility,’ to various design curricula. Psychological ‘fit’ was significantly associated with better academic performance. Creativity, exploration, and proactivity emerged as gatekeepers to design proficiency with additional competency alignment reinforcing success. IPsP traits, found in high performers, closely matched previous attempts at defining designer attributes. A more comprehensive model of designer competence was developed. Findings also illumined some key psychological guidelines for advancing design in business.

[1]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[2]  Brigitte Borja de Mozota,et al.  The Impact of User‐Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships* , 2005 .

[3]  C. Sansone,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation : the search for optimal motivation and performance , 2000 .

[4]  Shulamith Kreitler,et al.  The Cognitive Profile of Creativity in Design. , 2011 .

[5]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[6]  Andrew Simon Roberts,et al.  Cognitive styles and student progression in architectural design education , 2006 .

[7]  Mark Francis,et al.  Proactive Practice: Visionary Thought and Participatory Action in Environmental Design , 1999 .

[8]  Candy Carmel-Gilfilen,et al.  Developmental trajectories in design thinking: an examination of criteria , 2010 .

[9]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence , 1962 .

[10]  Marjolein C. J. Caniëls,et al.  The Antecedents of Creativity Revisited: A Process Perspective , 2014 .

[11]  Yasemin Afacan,et al.  Assessing creativity in design education: Analysis of creativity factors in the first-year design studio , 2012 .

[12]  Allen L. Edwards,et al.  The Relationship Between the Judged Desirability of a Trait and the Probability That the Trait Will Be Endorsed , 1953 .

[13]  Richard A. Heath,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics: Techniques and Applications in Psychology , 2000 .

[14]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[15]  Shimul Melwani,et al.  The Bias Against Creativity , 2012, Psychological science.

[16]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. , 1979 .

[17]  Jim Euchner.  Design , 2014, Catalysis from A to Z.

[18]  A. Whitaker.  The Fabric of Reality , 2001 .

[19]  John Baer,et al.  Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long‐term stability? , 1994 .

[20]  Merlijn Kouprie,et al.  A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life , 2009 .

[21]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. , 1994 .

[22]  W. Lyddon.  Creativity in Context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity" , 1998 .

[23]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and Creativity: Effects of Motivational Orientation on Creative Writers , 1985 .

[24]  Jean M. Vettel,et al.  Estimating direction in brain-behavior interactions: Proactive and reactive brain states in driving , 2016, NeuroImage.

[25]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design (4th ed.) , 2008 .

[26]  Anthony M. Armocida.  The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People , 1992 .

[27]  Hernan Casakin,et al.  Creative thinking as a predictor of creative problem solving in architectural design students. , 2010 .

[28]  R. Beghetto,et al.  Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity Research , 2004 .

[29]  Jennifer Dodorico McDonald,et al.  Measuring Personality Constructs: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Self-Reports, Informant Reports and Behavioural Assessments , 2008 .

[30]  S. Covey.  The seven habits of highly effective people. , 1991, National medical-legal journal.

[31]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity? , 2011 .

[32]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Innovation , 2012, A World Connected.

[33]  V. Stuphorn,et al.  Proactive and reactive control by the medial frontal cortex , 2012, Front. Neuroeng..

[34]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Inspired by Distraction , 2012, Psychological science.

[35]  M. Clapham.  Testing/Measurement/Assessment , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity.

[36]  T. M. Amabile.  Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[37]  L. Shulman,et al.  Modes of thinking in young children , 1965 .

[38]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World , 2002 .

[39]  W. Chu,et al.  An Anthology of I Ching , 1977 .

[40]  N. Cross.  The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability , 1990 .

[41]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Developments in design methodology , 1984 .

[42]  Chris Conley,et al.  Leveraging Design's Core Competencies , 2010 .

[43]  Thomas Hoff,et al.  What We Talk About When We Talk About Design. Toward a Taxonomy of Design Competencies , 2014 .

[44]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Creativity and intelligence. , 1998 .