New Tools for Dealing with Errors-in-Variables in DEA

The axiomatic literature on technical efficiency measurement has drawn attention to the indication problem of the Debreu-Farrell (DF) measure. We follow a shadow price approach to preserve the DF benchmark while reconciling it with the Koopmans efficiency characterization. First, we define a set of Koopmans efficient references that can be rationalized in a similar way as the DF projection. The indication problem is then captured using a measure of implicit allocative or mix efficiency, also interpretable as a dominance measure in price space. We consequently present a mix-adjusted DF framework for efficiency measurement in which e.g. the Zieschang (1984) procedure can be

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[3]  W. Cooper,et al.  Chance Constrained Programming Formulations for Stochastic Characterizations of Efficiency and Dominance in DEA , 1998 .

[4]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[5]  Joe Zhu Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Dieter Gstach,et al.  Another Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis in Noisy Environments: DEA+ , 1998 .

[7]  Roger Koenker,et al.  Galton, Edgeworth, Frisch, and prospects for quantile regression in econometrics , 2000 .

[8]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Sensitivity and stability analysis in dea , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  A. Charnes,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF EFFICIENCY CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE ADDITIVE MODEL OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[11]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  Chance‐constrained data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[12]  L. Gong,et al.  Efficiency measurement of production operations under uncertainty , 1995 .

[13]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[14]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research , 1997 .

[15]  Susan X. Li Stochastic models and variable returns to scales in data envelopment analysis , 1998 .

[16]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[17]  Valter Boljuncic,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in the additive model of data envelopment analysis , 1998, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[18]  N. Petersen,et al.  Chance constrained efficiency evaluation , 1995 .

[19]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .