On-Line Evidence for Spontaneous Trait Inferences at Encoding

Three experiments obtained evidence that spontaneous trait inferences (STIs) occur on-line, at encoding. In each, participants read many sentences on a computer screen. After each paragraph, they indicated whether it included a test probe word. Paragraphs that imply but do not contain traits should increase errors or reaction times (RTs) to trait probes. In Experiment 1, trait-implying paragraphs produced more errors than control paragraphs, supporting the hypothesis. In Experiments 2 and 3, with feedback on each trial, longer RTs supported the hypothesis. STIs had the same effects as McKoon and Ratcliff's "predicting inferences. " Unexpectedly, participants gained control over STIs and predicting inferences, so that RT differences (and error differences in Experiment 1) declined over trials. Analyses of reading times in Experiment 3 ruled out several alternative explanations. Results demonstrate that social inferences can occur spontaneously at encoding and suggest that immediate feedback may make control possible.

[1]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Task effects on the spontaneous activation of trait concepts , 1992 .

[2]  J. N. Bassili.  Procedural Efficiency and the Spontaneity of Trait Inference , 1993 .

[3]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  On the spontaneity of trait attribution: Converging evidence for the role of cognitive strategy. , 1986 .

[4]  G. Moskowitz,et al.  Spontaneous trait inferences as self-generated primes: implications for conscious social judgment. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Spontaneous Trait Inferences: Effects of Recognition Instructions and Subliminal Priming on Recognition Performance , 1991 .

[6]  J. Uleman.  Consciousness and Control , 1987 .

[7]  Y. Trope.  Identification and Inferential Processes in Dispositional Attribution. , 1986 .

[8]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[9]  J. Uleman,et al.  "When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences": Correction to Winter and Uleman. , 1986 .

[10]  M. Lupfer,et al.  Impact of context on spontaneous trait and situational attributions. , 1990 .

[11]  K. Forster.  Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing* , 1981 .

[12]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[13]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Semantic associations and elaborative inference. , 1989 .

[14]  L. Newman,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1990 .

[15]  L. Newman.  How Individualists Interpret Behavior: Idiocentrism and Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1993 .

[16]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Toward A Contextualist View of Elaborative Inferences , 1990 .

[17]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[18]  L. Newman.  Why Are Traits Inferred Spontaneously? A Developmental Approach , 1991 .

[19]  J. Uleman,et al.  "How automatic are social judgments?" Correction to Winter, Uleman, and Cunniff. , 1986 .

[20]  D. Wegner.  Ironic processes of mental control. , 1994, Psychological review.

[21]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation. , 1994 .

[22]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of eleborative inference with recognition: Compatibility checking vs compound cue theory , 1989 .