Landscape approaches for determining the ensemble of folding transition states: success and failure hinge on the degree of frustration.

We present a method for determining structural properties of the ensemble of folding transition states from protein simulations. This method relies on thermodynamic quantities (free energies as a function of global reaction coordinates, such as the percentage of native contacts) and not on "kinetic" measurements (rates, transmission coefficients, complete trajectories); consequently, it requires fewer computational resources compared with other approaches, making it more suited to large and complex models. We explain the theoretical framework that underlies this method and use it to clarify the connection between the experimentally determined Phi value, a quantity determined by the ratio of rate and stability changes due to point mutations, and the average structure of the transition state ensemble. To determine the accuracy of this thermodynamic approach, we apply it to minimalist protein models and compare these results with the ones obtained by using the standard experimental procedure for determining Phi values. We show that the accuracy of both methods depends sensitively on the amount of frustration. In particular, the results are similar when applied to models with minimal amounts of frustration, characteristic of rapid-folding, single-domain globular proteins.

[1]  A. Fersht,et al.  Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering , 1989, Nature.

[2]  T. Sosnick,et al.  Molecular collapse: The rate‐limiting step in two‐state cytochrome c folding , 1996, Proteins.

[3]  R. Berry,et al.  MODELING SELF-ASSEMBLING OF PROTEINS : ASSEMBLED STRUCTURES, RELAXATION DYNAMICS, AND PHASE COEXISTENCE , 1999 .

[4]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Exploring the protein folding funnel landscape , 1997 .

[5]  David Baker,et al.  Important role of hydrogen bonds in the structurally polarized transition state for folding of the src SH3 domain , 1998, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[6]  G. Rose,et al.  Molten globular characteristics of the native state of apomyoglobin , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  H. Gray,et al.  Cytochrome c folding triggered by electron transfer. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.

[8]  J. Onuchic,et al.  DIFFUSIVE DYNAMICS OF THE REACTION COORDINATE FOR PROTEIN FOLDING FUNNELS , 1996, cond-mat/9601091.

[9]  V S Pande,et al.  Folding pathway of a lattice model for proteins. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Brooks,et al.  First-principles calculation of the folding free energy of a three-helix bundle protein. , 1995, Science.

[11]  V. Pande,et al.  On the transition coordinate for protein folding , 1998 .

[12]  R. Zwanzig High‐Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases , 1954 .

[13]  K. Dill,et al.  A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins , 1989 .

[14]  A. Fersht,et al.  Movement of the position of the transition state in protein folding. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[15]  L Mayne,et al.  Protein folding studied using hydrogen-exchange labeling and two-dimensional NMR. , 1992, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[16]  A. Bhuyan,et al.  Kinetic mechanism of cytochrome c folding: involvement of the heme and its ligands. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[17]  H. Gray,et al.  Protein Folding Triggered by Electron Transfer , 1996, Science.

[18]  A. Fersht Nucleation mechanisms in protein folding. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding funnels: the nature of the transition state ensemble. , 1996, Folding & design.

[20]  R. Hochstrasser,et al.  Ultrafast thermally induced unfolding of RNase A. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Lattice models for proteins reveal multiple folding nuclei for nucleation-collapse mechanism. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Molecular picture of folding of a small α/β protein , 1998 .

[23]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[24]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[25]  A. Fersht,et al.  Synergy between simulation and experiment in describing the energy landscape of protein folding. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  K. Dill,et al.  From Levinthal to pathways to funnels , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  Martin Gruebele,et al.  Observation of distinct nanosecond and microsecond protein folding events , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[28]  D. Baker,et al.  Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[29]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Intermediates in the folding reactions of small proteins. , 1990, Annual review of biochemistry.

[30]  S. Marqusee,et al.  The kinetic folding intermediate of ribonuclease H resembles the acid molten globule and partially unfolded molecules detected under native conditions , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[31]  P E Wright,et al.  Formation of a molten globule intermediate early in the kinetic folding pathway of apomyoglobin. , 1993, Science.

[32]  Christoph Dellago,et al.  On the calculation of reaction rate constants in the transition path ensemble , 1999 .

[33]  R. Dyer,et al.  Fast events in protein folding: helix melting and formation in a small peptide. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[34]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structure of the transition state for folding of a protein derived from experiment and simulation. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Diffusion-limited contact formation in unfolded cytochrome c: estimating the maximum rate of protein folding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Folding funnels and frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein landscapes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Fersht,et al.  The changing nature of the protein folding transition state: implications for the shape of the free-energy profile for folding. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  M Karplus,et al.  "New view" of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. , 1997, Science.

[40]  Terrence G. Oas,et al.  The energy landscape of a fast-folding protein mapped by Ala→Gly Substitutions , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[41]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Protein folding funnels: a kinetic approach to the sequence-structure relationship. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  C. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the folding free energy surface of a three-helix bundle protein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  V. Muñoz,et al.  Submillisecond kinetics of protein folding. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[44]  L. Serrano,et al.  Obligatory steps in protein folding and the conformational diversity of the transition state , 1998, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[45]  L Serrano,et al.  Structure of the transition state in the folding process of human procarboxypeptidase A2 activation domain. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein design: a perspective from simple tractable models , 1998, Folding & design.

[47]  P G Wolynes,et al.  Protein folding mechanisms and the multidimensional folding funnel , 1998, Proteins.

[48]  R. Sauer,et al.  Sequence space, folding and protein design. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[49]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Toward an outline of the topography of a realistic protein-folding funnel. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  J. Onuchic,et al.  The energy landscape theory of protein folding: insights into folding mechanisms and scenarios. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.

[53]  C. Dobson,et al.  Time-resolved biophysical methods in the study of protein folding. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[54]  Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of proteinlike heteropolymers: Monte Carlo histogram technique , 1995, chem-ph/9507003.

[55]  C L Brooks,et al.  Exploring the origins of topological frustration: design of a minimally frustrated model of fragment B of protein A. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.