Optimal design of focused experiments and surveys

SUMMARY Experiments and surveys are often performed to obtain data that constrain some previously underconstrained model. Often, constraints are most desired in a particular subspace of model space. Experiment design optimization requires that the quality of any particular design can be both quanti¢ed and then maximized.This study shows how the quality can be de¢ned such that it depends on the amount of information that is focused in the particular subspace of interest. In addition, algorithms are presented which allow one particular focused quality measure (from the class of focused measures) to be evaluated e⁄ciently. A subclass of focused quality measures is also related to the standard variance and resolution measures from linearized inverse theory. The theory presented here requires thatthe relationship between model parameters and data can be linearized around a reference model without signi¢cant loss of information. Physical and ¢nancial constraints de¢ne the space of possible experiment designs. Cross-well tomographic examples are presented, plus a strategy for survey design to maximize information about linear combinations of parameters such as bulk modulus, i~jz2k/3.

[1]  K Andrzej,et al.  An Algorithm for the Optimum Distribution of a Regional Seismic , 1977 .

[2]  R. C. St. John,et al.  D-Optimality for Regression Designs: A Review , 1975 .

[3]  David M. Steinberg,et al.  Optimal configuration of a seismographic network: A statistical approach , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[5]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Reconditioning inverse problems using the genetic algorithm and revised parameterization , 1997 .

[6]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Simulation of complete seismic surveys for evaluation of experiment design and processing , 1996 .

[7]  J. Scales,et al.  Global search and genetic algorithms , 1992 .

[8]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Optimized and robust experimental design: a non-linear application to EM sounding , 1998 .

[9]  A. Curtis,et al.  Optimal Cross-borehole Tomographic Geometries , 1998 .

[10]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[11]  H. L. Lucas,et al.  DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS IN NON-LINEAR SITUATIONS , 1959 .

[12]  Andrzej Kijko,et al.  An algorithm for the optimum distribution of a regional seismic network—I , 1977 .

[13]  John Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Sys-tems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology , 1975 .

[14]  G. Backus,et al.  Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross Earth data , 1970, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  A. Wald On the Efficient Design of Statistical Investigations , 1943 .

[16]  David M. Steinberg,et al.  Configuring a seismographic network for optimal monitoring of fault lines and multiple sources , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  A. Curtis Optimal experiment design: cross-borehole tomographic examples , 1999 .

[18]  P. Laycock,et al.  Optimum Experimental Designs , 1995 .

[19]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Genetic algorithms in seismic waveform inversion , 1992 .

[20]  F. Pukelsheim Optimal Design of Experiments , 1993 .

[21]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Optimum Experimental Designs , 1992 .

[22]  Carl Wunsch,et al.  Oceanographic Experiment Design by Simulated Annealing , 1990 .