Dissociation of category versus item priming in face processing: an event-related potential study

The underlying specificity of visual object categorization and discrimination can be elucidated by studying different types of repetition priming. Here we focused on this issue in face processing. We investigated category priming (i.e. the prime and target stimuli represent different exemplars of the same object category) and item priming (i.e. the prime and target stimuli are exactly the same image), using an immediate repetition paradigm. Twenty-three subjects were asked to respond as fast and accurately as possible to categorize whether the target stimulus was a face or a building image, but to ignore the prime stimulus. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) and reaction times (RTs) simultaneously. The RT data showed significant effects of category priming in both face trials and building trials, as well as a significant effect of item priming in face trials. With respect to the ERPs, in face trials, no priming effect was observed at the P100 stage, whereas a category priming effect emerged at the N170 stage, and an item priming effect at the P200 stage. In contrast, in building trials, priming effects occurred already at the P100 stage. Our results indicated that distinct neural mechanisms underlie separable kinds of immediate repetition priming in face processing.

[1]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[2]  D. Schacter.  Perceptual Representation Systems and Implicit Memory , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. Harnad.  Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition , 1990 .

[4]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994 .

[6]  H Begleiter,et al.  Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[8]  G. Mangun.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[9]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatial Selective Attention Affects Early Extrastriate But Not Striate Components of the Visual Evoked Potential , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[13]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[14]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[15]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[18]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  S. Ogawa,et al.  An approach to probe some neural systems interaction by functional MRI at neural time scale down to milliseconds. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Eimer.  Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Michael Bach,et al.  Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP , 2001, Vision Research.

[26]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[27]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Florence Thibaut,et al.  ERPs ASSOCIATED WITH FAMILIARITY AND DEGREE OF FAMILIARITY DURING FACE RECOGNITION , 2002, The International journal of neuroscience.

[29]  S. Campanella,et al.  Categorical Perception of Happiness and Fear Facial Expressions: An ERP Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Burton,et al.  Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[32]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[33]  Boutheina Jemel,et al.  Differential involvement of episodic and face representations in ERP repetition effects , 2003, Neuroreport.

[34]  R. Henson.  Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[35]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects , 2004, Neuroreport.

[37]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? , 2004, Journal of vision.

[38]  J. Mulligan.  Taking gaze tracking from the lab to the field (and sky) , 2004 .

[39]  A. Burton,et al.  N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions , 2004, Neuroreport.

[40]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[41]  G. Rousselet,et al.  Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? , 2004, Journal of vision.

[42]  Robert J. Moorhead,et al.  Visualization of fluid flows in virtual environments , 2004, J. Vis..

[43]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs , 2004, NeuroImage.

[44]  M. D Rugg,et al.  The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming , 2004, NeuroImage.

[45]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Priming emotional facial expressions as evidenced by event-related brain potentials. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[47]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  C. Jacques,et al.  The Speed of Individual Face Categorization , 2006, Psychological science.

[49]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Masked and unmasked electrophysiological repetition effects of famous faces , 2006, Brain Research.

[51]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[52]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Memory systems for structural and semantic knowledge of faces and buildings , 2006, Brain Research.

[53]  C. Jacques,et al.  The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[54]  S. Ogawa,et al.  An fMRI study of the functional distinction of neuronal circuits at the sites on ventral visual stream co-activated by visual stimuli of different objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Visual P2 component is related to theta phase-locking , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[56]  Karen M. Evans,et al.  The memory that's right and the memory that's left: Event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.

[58]  C. Jacques,et al.  Early adaptation to repeated unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: Evidence from the N170 ERP component , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  F. Eustache,et al.  The time course of repetition effects for familiar faces and objects: An ERP study , 2009, Brain Research.

[60]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Distributed processing and temporal codes in neuronal networks , 2009, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[61]  M. Eimer,et al.  Response profile of the face-sensitive N170 component: a rapid adaptation study. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[62]  Michael Murias,et al.  Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[63]  Gyula Kovács,et al.  Neural Correlates of Generic versus Gender-specific Face Adaptation , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Mauro Ursino,et al.  An integrated neural model of semantic memory, lexical retrieval and category formation, based on a distributed feature representation , 2011, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[65]  A. Young,et al.  Human Cognitive Neuropsychology , 2013 .