Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Outcomes to 5 Years After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation to Address Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee

Background: The availability remains limited of midterm clinical and radiologic results into matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). Outcomes are required to validate the efficacy of MACI as a suitable surgical treatment option for articular cartilage defects in the knee. Hypothesis: A significant improvement in clinical and magnetic resonance imaging–based (MRI-based) outcomes after MACI will exist throughout the postoperative timeline to 5 years after surgery. Furthermore, patient demographics, cartilage defect parameters, and injury/surgery history will be associated with patient and graft outcome, whereas a significant correlation will exist between clinical and MRI-based outcomes at 5 years after surgery. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A prospective evaluation was undertaken to assess clinical and MRI-based outcomes to 5 years in 41 patients (53 grafts) after MACI to the knee. After MACI surgery and a 12-week structured rehabilitation program, patients underwent clinical assessments (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, SF-36, 6-minute walk test, knee range of motion) and MRI assessments at 3, 12, and 24 months, as well as 5 years after surgery. The MRI evaluation assessed 8 previously defined pertinent parameters of graft repair, as well as a combined MRI composite score. Results: A significant improvement (P < .05) was demonstrated for all Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and SF-36 subscales over the postoperative timeline, as well as the 6-minute walk test and active knee extension. A significant improvement (P < .0001) was observed for the MRI composite score, as well as several individual graft scoring parameters. At 5 years after surgery, 67% of MACI grafts demonstrated complete infill, whereas 89% demonstrated good to excellent filling of the chondral defect. Patient demographics, cartilage defect parameters, and injury/surgery history demonstrated no significant pertinent correlations with clinical or MRI-based outcomes at 5 years, and no significant correlations existed between clinical and MRI-based outcome measures. At 5 years after surgery, 98% of patients were satisfied with the ability of MACI surgery to relieve knee pain; 86%, with improvement in their ability to perform normal daily tasks; and 73%, with their ability to participate in sport 5 years after MACI. Conclusion: These results suggest that MACI provides a suitable midterm treatment option for articular cartilage defects in the knee. Long-term follow-up is essential to confirm whether the repair tissue has the durability required to maintain long-term patient quality of life.

[1]  S. Marlovits,et al.  Evaluation of Cartilage Repair Tissue after Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Using a Hyaluronic-Based or a Collagen-Based Scaffold with Morphological MOCART Scoring and Biochemical T2 Mapping , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  R. Novario,et al.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: mid-term and long-term follow-up by MR arthrography , 2010, Skeletal Radiology.

[3]  T. Ackland,et al.  MRI and clinical evaluation of collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (CACI) at two years. , 2007, The Knee.

[4]  L. Peterson Articular cartilage injuries treated with autologous chondrocyte transplantation in the human knee. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[5]  Robert A Siston,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  S. Nehrer,et al.  Treatment of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects with Hyalograft C in the Knee , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  L. Peterson,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation. , 2006, Instructional course lectures.

[8]  E. Stankevičius,et al.  A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  T. Bryant,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for chondral defects of the knee: indications and technique. , 2002, The journal of knee surgery.

[10]  Jörg Haller,et al.  Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[11]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G. Bentley,et al.  The role of the Short Form 36 Health Survey in autologous chondrocyte implantation. , 2005, The Knee.

[13]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage: Topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  B. Wondrasch,et al.  Effect of Accelerated Weightbearing after Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation on the Femoral Condyle on Radiographic and Clinical Outcome after 2 Years , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  J. Steadman,et al.  DIE TECHNIK DER MIKROFRAKTURIERUNG ZUR BEHANDLUNG VON KOMPLETTEN KNORPELDEFEKTEN IM KNIEGELENK , 1999 .

[16]  C. Winalski,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of autologous chondrocyte implantation. , 2001, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[17]  Peter Behrens,et al.  Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI)--5-year follow-up. , 2006, The Knee.

[18]  B. Beynnon,et al.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[19]  D. Lloyd,et al.  Traditional vs accelerated approaches to post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): comparison of clinical, biomechanical and radiographic outcomes. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[20]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  MRI Monitoring of Cartilage Repair in the Knee: A Review , 2008, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[21]  P. Leander,et al.  Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): intra‐ and interobserver variability in standardized drawing of regions of interest , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[22]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Evaluation of Cartilage Injuries and Repair , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Herwig Imhof,et al.  Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[24]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Treatment of Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Knee , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  A. Ba-Ssalamah,et al.  Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: noninvasive monitoring by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  G. Vásárhelyi,et al.  Autologous osteochondral grafting--technique and long-term results. , 2008, Injury.

[27]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Patellofemoral Full-Thickness Chondral Defects Treated With Second-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[28]  Leif E. Peterson,et al.  Advanced techniques in autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1999, Clinics in sports medicine.

[29]  J A Skinner,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a prospective, randomised study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Articular cartilage engineering with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. A review of recent developments. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  C. Krestan,et al.  Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair with HyalograftC: two-year follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[32]  Michael Sittinger,et al.  Treatment of posttraumatic and focal osteoarthritic cartilage defects of the knee with autologous polymer-based three-dimensional chondrocyte grafts: 2-year clinical results , 2007, Arthritis research & therapy.

[33]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Second-generation autologous chondrocyte transplantation: MRI findings and clinical correlations at a minimum 5-year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[34]  B. Sennett,et al.  The Morbidity Associated with Osteochondral Harvest from Asymptomatic Knees for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[35]  S. Marlovits,et al.  MR imaging of osteochondral grafts and autologous chondrocyte implantation , 2006, European Radiology.

[36]  Stefan Marlovits,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[37]  B. Beynnon,et al.  IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients? , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[38]  K. Briggs,et al.  [The microfracture technic in the management of complete cartilage defects in the knee joint]. , 1999, Der Orthopade.

[39]  B. Oakes,et al.  Prospective clinical study of autologous chondrocyte implantation and correlation with MRI at three and 12 months , 2004 .