eGovernment in cities of the knowledge society. An empirical investigation of Smart Cities' governmental websites

Abstract In view of the increased popularity of eGovernment as an important aspect of the development of Smart or Informational World Cities, we outline three research questions: (1) What is the state of maturity of eGovernments in Informational World Cities? (2) How good (or poor) is their usability? (3) How do they handle boundary documents? In order to clear up these issues empirically, we formulated an extended criteria model for the quantification of eGovernment maturity, analyzed the average quality of the information architecture of 31 identified Informational World Cities' official websites, and studied the processing of boundary documents, i.e. documents that serve different user groups. Our outcomes indicate that the maturity and usability levels of investigated cities are much differentiated, whereas the implementation of boundary documents in form of detailed information sheets is rather scarce. Considering the maturity of investigated eGovernments, there is still potential for improvement, especially regarding the aspects of communication and transaction services. The differences between the eGovernments' usability standards are substantial and the results are partially suboptimal. Our outcomes indicate that the usability levels retrieved from task-based evaluation are not directly linked to integration of boundary documents into the governmental websites.

[1]  Yui-Liang Chen,et al.  2005 accessibility diagnosis on the government web sites in Taiwan, R.O.C. , 2006, W4A '06.

[2]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Designing E-Government Services: Key Service Attributes and Citizens’ Preference Structures , 2012 .

[4]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  How "Smart" Are Japanese Cities? An Empirical Investigation of Infrastructures and Governmental Programs in Tokyo, Yokohama, Osaka, and Kyoto , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[6]  Myongho Yi,et al.  Comparison of social media use for the U.S. and the Korean governments , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Information Markets: A Strategic Guideline for the I-Commerce , 2011 .

[8]  M. Castells,et al.  The Informational City. Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process , 1995 .

[9]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Integrated views of e-government website usability: perspectives from users and web diagnostic tools , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[12]  Tony Carrizales,et al.  Recent trends in e–government: states' and local governments' utilisation of websites , 2011 .

[13]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Wolfgang G. Stock.  Informational cities: Analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Ricardo Valerdi,et al.  Boundary Objects as a Framework to Understand the Role of Systems Integrators , 2007 .

[16]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-Government Interoperability , 2012 .

[17]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The co-evolution of e-government and public libraries: Technologies, access, education, and partnerships , 2012 .

[18]  James K. Scott.  “E” the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement? , 2006 .

[19]  Yuquan Shi,et al.  The accessibility of Chinese local government Web sites: An exploratory study , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa.  The accessibility of Saudi Arabia government Web sites: an exploratory study , 2012, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  eParticipation research: Systematizing the field , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[23]  Patrice McDermott,et al.  Building open government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[26]  Carsten S. Østerlund,et al.  What Characterize Documents That Bridge Boundaries Compared to Documents That Do Not? An Exploratory Study of Documentation in FLOSS Teams , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  eParticipation: Designing and Managing Political Discussion Forums , 2010 .

[28]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Business perceptions and satisfaction with e-government: Findings from a Canadian survey , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  Mila Gascó.  Approaching E-Government Interoperability , 2012 .

[30]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  Linking service development methods to interoperability governance: The case of Egypt , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Rony Medaglia,et al.  eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011) , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[34]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .

[36]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Die mittlere Güte von Navigationssystemen: Ein Kennwert für komparative Analysen von Websites bei Usability-Nutzertests , 2003 .

[37]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Public Libraries in the Knowledge Society: Core Services of Libraries in Informational World Cities , 2013 .