Viscous Aerodynamic Shape Optimization with Installed Propulsion Effects

Aerodynamic shape optimization is demonstrated to tailor the under-track pressure signature of a conceptual low-boom supersonic aircraft. Primarily, the optimization matches the near-field pressure disturbances induced by propulsion integration effects to a prescribed low-boom target. For computational efficiency, gradient-based optimization is used and coupled to the discrete adjoint formulation of the Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes equations. The engine outer nacelle, nozzle, and vertical tail fairing are axi-symmetrically parameterized, while the horizontal tail is shaped using a wing-based parameterization. Overall, 48 design variables are coupled to the geometry and used to deform the outer mold line. During the design process, an inequality drag constraint is enforced to avoid major compromise in aerodynamic performance. Linear elastic mesh morphing is used to deform the volume grid between design iterations. The optimization is performed at Mach 1.6 cruise, assuming standard day altitude conditions at 51,707-ft. To reduce uncertainty, a coupled thermodynamic engine cycle model is employed that captures installed inlet performance effects on engine operation.

[1]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adjoint-Based Low-Boom Design with Cart3D , 2011 .

[2]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Sonic Boom Mitigation Through Aircraft Design and Adjoint Methodology , 2012 .

[3]  Wu Li,et al.  Inverse Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Concepts Using Reversed Equivalent-Area Targets , 2014 .

[4]  Mathias Wintzer,et al.  Airframe-Nozzle-Plume Interactions in the Context of Low Sonic Boom Design , 2015 .

[5]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[6]  Sriram K. Rallabhandi Advanced Sonic Boom Prediction Using Augmented Burger's Equation , 2011 .

[7]  Jan-Renee Carlson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Dual-Stream Supersonic Plug Nozzle , 2015 .

[8]  Robert E. Robertson,et al.  Food Assistance: Efforts To Control Fraud and Abuse in the Child and Adult Care Food Program Should Be Strengthened. United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Committees. , 1999 .

[9]  John W. Slater,et al.  Methodology for the Design of Streamline-Traced External-Compression Supersonic Inlets , 2014 .

[10]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  User's Guide for SNOPT Version 7.4: Software for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming , 2015 .

[11]  M Sullivan Brenda,et al.  A Loudness Calculation Procedure Applied to Shaped Sonic Booms , 2003 .

[12]  David L. Marcum,et al.  Generation of unstructured grids for viscous flow applications , 1995 .

[13]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Specialized CFD Grid Generation Methods for Near-Field Sonic Boom Prediction , 2014 .

[14]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Recent improvements in aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes , 2001 .

[15]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Automated Tetrahedral Mesh Generation for CFD Analysis of Aircraft in Conceptual Design , 2014 .

[16]  Sriram K. Rallabhandi,et al.  Application of Adjoint Methodology in Various Aspects of Sonic Boom Design , 2014 .

[17]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Discrete Adjoint-Based Design for Unsteady Turbulent Flows on Dynamic Overset Unstructured Grids , 2012 .

[18]  Robert T. Biedron,et al.  Recent Enhancements To The FUN3D Flow Solver For Moving-Mesh Applications , 2009 .

[19]  G. Golub,et al.  Gmres: a Generalized Minimum Residual Algorithm for Solving , 2022 .

[20]  Donald C. Howe,et al.  A Method for Reducing Sonic Boom Strength by Tailoring the Shape of the Propulsive Streamtube , 2013 .

[21]  David L. Rodriguez Propulsion/Airframe Integration and Optimization on a Supersonic Business Jet , 2007 .

[22]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of Refined Tetrahedral Meshes with Projected, Stretched, and Sheared Prism Layers for Sonic Boom Analysis (Invited) , 2011 .

[23]  Sriram K. Rallabhandi,et al.  Inlet Trade Study for a Low-Boom Aircraft Demonstrator , 2016 .

[24]  Erik Lund,et al.  Proceedings of 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference , 2008 .

[25]  David L. Rodriguez Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Supersonic Inlet Using a Cartesian CFD Method , 2004 .

[26]  D. Darmofal,et al.  An implicit, exact dual adjoint solution method for turbulent flows on unstructured grids , 2004 .

[27]  Timothy R. Conners,et al.  The Feasibility of High-Flow Nacelle Bypass for Low Sonic Boom Propulsion System Design , 2011 .

[28]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[29]  M. Giles,et al.  Algorithm Developments for Discrete Adjoint Methods , 2003 .

[30]  J. Samareh Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Free-form Deformation , 2004 .

[31]  Jamshid A. Samareh,et al.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY AERODYNAMIC-STRUCTURAL SHAPE OPTIMIZATION USING DEFORMATION (MASSOUD) , 2000 .

[32]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Adjoint-based method for supersonic aircraft design using equivalent area distributions , 2012 .

[33]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Adjoint-Based Optimization of a Hypersonic Inlet , 2015 .

[34]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Aerodynamic design sensitivities on an unstructured mesh using the Navier-Stokes equations and a discrete adjoint formulation , 1998 .

[35]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[36]  Dana P. Hammond,et al.  FUN3D Manual: 12.8 , 2014 .