Bidimensional Data Allow for Better Age Estimation on Immature Specimens than Unidimensional Data: A Preliminary Study on the Ilium

Most biometric age estimation methods used in anthropological and forensic science for juveniles are based on unidimensional measurements (length or width). Here, a new method using bidimensional data was tested. A 3D morphometric analysis was performed on 108 CT scans of ilium bone of juveniles (from 20 gestational weeks to 12 years old). The sample was divided into training and validation groups. Best predictors were determined by comparing the efficiency of each variable (length, width, area, and module: a product of length and width). We established linear and polynomial regressions for each parameter for both sides. Applying the equations to the validation sample showed no significant difference between real and predicted ages. For age estimation, the area and module parameters yielded better results than unidimensional measurements. The results from this preliminary study were highly conclusive, and it would be interesting to extend the work, covering larger samples, and other bones.

[1]  N. Macleod,et al.  Morphometric Criteria for Sexing Juvenile Human Skeletons Using the Ilium , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  V. Volpato Morphogenèse de l’endostructure osseuse de l’ilion humain , 2008 .

[3]  R. Meindl,et al.  Fetal age: methods of estimation and effects of pathology. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  M. Colbert,et al.  Technical note: CT thresholding protocols for taking measurements on three-dimensional models. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  E. L. Reynolds The bone pelvis in prepuberal childhood. , 1947, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  E. L. Reynolds The bony pelvic girdle in early infancy. A roentgenometric study , 1945 .

[7]  S. Veschi,et al.  Recherches sur la collection d’enfants et d’adolescents d’âge et de sexe connus de Bologne (Italie) : diagnose de l’âge sur la base du degré de maturation osseuse , 2002 .

[8]  Olivier Dutour,et al.  Nouvelle formule de détermination de l'âge d'un fœtus , 2002 .

[9]  H. Thaler,et al.  How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age? , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  A. Tillier,et al.  Test des fonctions discriminantes de Schutkowski impliquant l'ilium pour la détermination du sexe dans des séries d'enfants de sexe et d'âge connus , 1993 .

[11]  M. Panuel,et al.  Postmortem assessment of fetal diaphyseal femoral length: validation of a radiographic methodology. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  D H Ubelaker,et al.  Estimating age at death from immature human skeletons: an overview. , 1987, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  Sebastian Muller Human Skeletal Remains Excavation Analysis Interpretation , 2016 .

[14]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Sex and age diagnosis by ischium morphometric analysis. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[15]  D. Mittler,et al.  Sex determination in subadults using auricular surface morphology: a forensic science perspective. , 1992, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  C. Hall,et al.  Developmental Juvenile Osteology , 2000 .

[17]  R. Deter,et al.  Growth standards for anatomic measurements and growth rates derived from longitudinal studies of normal fetal growth , 1992, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[18]  J. Larroche,et al.  Growth velocity of the biparietal diameter, abdominal transverse diameter and femur length in the fetal period. , 1991, Early human development.

[19]  G. Amado De l'enfant à l'adulte , 1979 .

[20]  G. Verleye,et al.  Determinants of growth in body length from birth to 6 years of age: A longitudinal study of Lublin children , 1996, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[21]  R. Deter,et al.  Longitudinal studies of femur growth in normal fetuses , 1987, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[22]  F. Kósa,et al.  Forensic fetal osteology , 1978 .

[23]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Ilium growth study: applicability in sex and age diagnosis. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[24]  M. W. Warren Determination of gestational age from lunar age assessments in human fetal remains. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[25]  S. Saunders,et al.  Two arch criteria of the ilium for sex determination of immature skeletal remains: a test of their accuracy and an assessment of intra- and inter-observer error. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[26]  J L Scheuer,et al.  The estimation of late fetal and perinatal age from limb bone length by linear and logarithmic regression. , 1980, Annals of human biology.

[27]  W. H. Coleman,et al.  Sex differences in the growth of the human bony pelvis. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  B. Bourlière-Najean,et al.  Validation of a radiographic method to establish new fetal growth standards: radio-anatomical correlation. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[29]  L. Humphrey,et al.  Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Pubis growth study: applicability in sexual and age diagnostic. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[31]  H. Schutkowski,et al.  Sex determination of infant and juvenile skeletons: I. Morphognostic features. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[32]  D. Weaver,et al.  Sex differences in the ilia of a known sex and age sample of fetal and infant skeletons. , 1980, American journal of physical anthropology.

[33]  F. Zonneveld,et al.  Linear measurements of cortical bone and dental enamel by computed tomography: applications and problems. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.