Twenty-five years of end-user searching, Part 1: Research findings

, the author seeks to answer the following questions: What characterizes the queries that end users submit to online IR systems? What search features do people use? What features would enable them to improve on the retrievals they have in hand? What features are hardly ever used? What do end users do in response to the system's retrievals? Are end users satisfied with their online searches? Summarizing searches of online IR systems by the search features people use everyday makes information retrieval appear to be a very simplistic one-stop event. In Part 2, the author examines current models of the information retrieval process, demonstrating that information retrieval is much more complex and involves changes in cognition, feelings, and/or events during the information seeking process. She poses a host of new research questions that will further our understanding about end-user searching of online IR systems.

[1]  William H. Mischo,et al.  END-USER SEARCHING OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASES. , 1987 .

[2]  Michael D. Cooper,et al.  Usage patterns of a web-based library catalog , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Peiling Wang,et al.  Mining longitudinal web queries: Trends and patterns , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Richard A. Sit,et al.  Influences of general computer experience and ages of library database performance , 2000 .

[5]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Seeking and implementing automated assistance during the search process , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Winifred Sewell,et al.  Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Karen Markey,et al.  Subject searching in library catalogs , 1984 .

[9]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Are people asking questions of general Web search engines? , 2003, Online Inf. Rev..

[10]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Tom Peters,et al.  When Smart People Fail: An Analysis of the Transaction Log of an Online Public Access Catalog. , 1989 .

[12]  Geraldene Walker,et al.  Online Retrieval: A Dialogue of Theory and Practice , 1993 .

[13]  Amanda Spink,et al.  A day in the life of Web searching: an exploratory study , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the Web , 1998, SIGF.

[15]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information-retrieval studies , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  N Miller,et al.  MEDLINE on CD-ROM: end user searching in a medical school library. , 1988, Medical reference services quarterly.

[18]  Iwan G. J. H. Wopereis,et al.  Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Karen Markey,et al.  Dewey decimal classification online project : evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an onlin catalog , 1986 .

[20]  Charles R. Hildreth.  To Boolean or Not To Boolean. , 1983 .

[21]  Elaine Trzebiatowski,et al.  End User Study on BRS/After Dark. , 1984 .

[22]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Analysis of a very large web search engine query log , 1999, SIGF.

[23]  Karen Markey,et al.  Twenty-five years of end-user searching, Part 2: Future research directions , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Hong Xie,et al.  Traditional IR for web users: a context for general audience digital libraries , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  B M Wildemuth,et al.  End-user search behaviors and their relationship to search effectiveness. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[26]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  A Profile of End-User Searching Behavior by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2 , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Dennis Halcoussis,et al.  An empirical analysis of Web catalog user experiences , 2002 .

[28]  Raya Fidel,et al.  A Visit to the Information Mall: Web Searching Behavior of High School Students , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Digital libraries: Situating use in changing information infrastructure , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Amanda Spink,et al.  From E-Sex to E-Commerce: Web Search Changes , 2002, Computer.

[31]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[32]  Judith S. Haines,et al.  Experiences in Training End-User Searchers. , 1982 .

[33]  Karen Markey Drabenstott,et al.  Using subject headings for online retrieval , 1994 .

[34]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Empirical studies of end-user information searching , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Students' Searching and Evaluating with the Artemis Interface to a Digital Library , 2000 .

[36]  T. Peters.  The Online Catalog: A Critical Examination of Public Use , 1991 .

[37]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  Amanda Spink,et al.  E-Commerce Web Queries: Excite and Ask Jeeves Study , 2001, First Monday.

[39]  Tamas E. Doszkocs,et al.  CITE NLM: natural-language searching in an online catalog , 1983 .

[40]  Sally Jo Cunningham,et al.  A transaction log analysis of a digital library , 2000, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[41]  Karen M. Drabenstott,et al.  Do nondomain experts enlist the strategies of domain experts? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multimedia Web searching trends: 1997-2001 , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[43]  Natalie Schoch King.  Search Characteristics and the Effects of Experience on End Users of PaperChase , 1991 .

[44]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Web searching for sexual information: an exploratory study , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[45]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Research report prepared for OCLC on end user behavior on the Ohio state university libraries'online catalog : a computer monitoring study , 1983 .

[46]  Jeff Kupperman,et al.  On-Line Search in the Science Classroom: Benefits and Possibilities. , 1997 .

[47]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .

[48]  Carol S. Bond.  Web users' information retrieval methods and skills , 2004, Online Inf. Rev..

[49]  Shelda Debowski,et al.  Wrong way: go back! An exploration of novice search behaviours while conducting an information search , 2001, Electron. Libr..

[50]  Martin Kurth,et al.  The limits and limitations of transaction log analysis , 1993 .

[51]  John E. Tolle.  Current Utilization of Online Catalogs: Transaction Log Analysis. Volume I of Three Volumes. Final Report. , 1983 .

[52]  Winifred Sewell,et al.  Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[53]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Characteristics of question format web queries: an exploratory study , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[54]  Cheryl Kern‐Simirenko,et al.  OPAC User Logs: Implications for Bibliographic Instruction , 1983 .

[55]  Marilyn Ann Lester.  Coincidence of user vocabulary and Library of Congress subject headings : experiments to improve subject access in academic library online catalogs , 1989 .

[56]  Tim Bucknall,et al.  U-Search: A User Study of the CD-ROM Service at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. , 1992 .