Men, culture and hegemonic masculinity: understanding the experience of prostate cancer.

Following a diagnosis of, and treatment for prostate cancer, there is an expectation that men will cope with, adjust to and accept the psychosocial impact on their lives and relationships. Yet, there is a limited qualitative world literature investigating the psychosocial experience of prostate cancer, and almost no literature exploring how masculinity mediates in such an experience. This paper will suggest that the experience of prostate cancer, the process by which it is investigated, and the way in which it is understood has been shaped by an essentialist interpretation of gender, exemplified by hegemonic masculinity as the archetypal mechanism of male adaptation. In response to this static and limiting view of masculinity, this paper will offer a reframe of hegemonic masculinity. This reframe, being more aligned with common experience, will portray masculinity as a dynamic and contextual construct, better understood as one of a number of cultural reference points around which each man organises and adopts behaviour. It will be suggested that the extant literature, in being organised around hegemonic masculinity, obfuscates the experience of prostate cancer and acts to render covert any collateral masculinities, public or private, that may also be operating.

[1]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[2]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Cultures of Technological Embodiment: An Introduction , 1995 .

[3]  U. Boehmer,et al.  Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives. , 2001, The Journal of family practice.

[4]  K. Peiss,et al.  Boundaries, Negotiation, Consciousness: Reconceptualizing Gender Relations , 1985 .

[5]  Heyman En,et al.  Prostate cancer: an intimate view from patients and wives. , 1996 .

[6]  Annie Potts “The Essence of the Hard On” , 2000 .

[7]  R A Stephenson,et al.  Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  J. Martin Methodological Essentialism, False Difference, and Other Dangerous Traps , 1994, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[9]  K. Pakenham,et al.  Cancer of the Prostate , 2000 .

[10]  J. Dunn,et al.  The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000) , 2001, Psycho-oncology.

[11]  F. Bray,et al.  Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[12]  A. deMoura,et al.  [Cancer of the prostate]. , 1962, Jornal do medico.

[13]  C. Ashton,et al.  Living with treatment decisions: regrets and quality of life among men treated for metastatic prostate cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  E. Mykhalovskiy,et al.  Hegemonic Masculinity and the Experience of Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Approach , 2002 .

[15]  S. Speer Reconsidering the Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: Discursive Psychology, Conversation Analysis and Participants’ Orientations , 2001 .

[16]  V. A. Clarke,et al.  Prostate cancer: Patients' and spouses' coping and marital adjustment , 1999 .

[17]  R. Gray,et al.  Managing the Impact of Illness: The Experiences of Men with Prostate Cancer and their Spouses , 2000, Journal of health psychology.

[18]  Henrik Grönberg,et al.  Prostate cancer epidemiology , 2003, The Lancet.

[19]  U. Boehmer,et al.  Married couples' perspectives on prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decision‐making , 2001, Psycho-oncology.

[20]  W. Courtenay Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[21]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Sexual function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: multivariate quality-of-life analysis from CaPSURE. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. , 1999, Urology.

[22]  O. S. Nielsen,et al.  Urinary symptoms, potency, and quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer followed up with deferred treatment. , 1998, Urology.

[23]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Prostate cancer: embodied experience and perceptions of masculinity , 2002 .

[24]  Cliff Cheng,et al.  Marginalized Masculinities and Hegemonic Masculinity: An Introduction , 1999 .

[25]  V. T. Yong,et al.  Interviewing men on sensitive issues , 2001, Contemporary nurse.

[26]  A. Kiss,et al.  Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer , 2001, British medical journal.