Reliability analysis for the uncertainties in vehicle and high-speed railway bridge system based on an improved response surface method for nonlinear limit states

The paper deals with the reliability analysis for the high-speed railway bridge systems. Although the bridge–vehicle interactive system has much more uncertainties in the resistance and loads of trains moving at very high speed compared with static structural analysis, little concern has been engaged to identify which random variable has to be considered in the probabilistic analysis, or what criteria should be selected to determine the probabilistic safety or serviceability. The considered design parameters thus involve uncertainties in stiffness, moment of inertia, damping ratio of primary suspension in terms of load, geometry of girders and slabs, and the mechanical properties of girders in terms of resistance. The considered limit states embrace the safety of trains and comfort of passengers, and the acceptability criteria are based on UIC code. For evaluating the reliability of the time-dependent nonlinear behavior of complex structures, an improved Response Surface Method (RSM) is developed. An adaptive technique and a weight matrix are utilized as an optimizing technique that accelerates the convergence in the reliability analysis. The results of improved RSM, compared with the basic and adaptive RSM, are verified with the improved convergence to the exact solution. The bridge response is analyzed using a new three-dimensional finite element model of high-speed train–bridge interactions. The track structures are idealized using beam elements with the offset of beam nodes and beams on a two-parameter elastic foundation. The vehicle model developed for a 300 km/h train is employed. The calculated reliabilities for performance of the considered bridges and the passenger comfort on board of high-speed trains are compared to the conventional safety indices. The results of this study allow identifying the quantification of uncertainties that can control quality of the high-speed train service.

[1]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Prediction of the combination of failure modes for an arch bridge system , 2007 .

[2]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Weighted Integral Method. II: Response Variability and Reliability , 1991 .

[3]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Moving force identification - A frequency and time domains analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Byung Man Kwak,et al.  Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis , 2006 .

[5]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[6]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  DYNAMIC LOAD SPECTRA FOR GIRDER BRIDGES , 1995 .

[7]  Chang-Koon Choi,et al.  A Direct Modification Method for Strains due to Non-conforming Modes , 2001 .

[8]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability , 1993 .

[9]  Davy Janssens,et al.  The development of an adapted Markov chain modelling heuristic and simulation framework in the context of transportation research , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Moving force identification: A time domain method , 1997 .

[11]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC LOAD FOR BRIDGES , 1991 .

[12]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Dynamic wheel loads from bridge strains , 1988 .

[13]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[14]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  Jeng-Hsiang Lin,et al.  Response of a bridge to a moving vehicle load , 2006 .

[16]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[17]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[18]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[19]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[20]  I. Kaymaz,et al.  A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[21]  S. S. Law,et al.  An interpretive method for moving force identification , 1999 .

[22]  Chang-Koon Choi,et al.  A new three-dimensional finite element analysis model of high-speed train–bridge interactions , 2003 .

[23]  Tsuyoshi Takada,et al.  Weighted integral method in stochastic finite element analysis , 1990 .

[24]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .