Influence of the addendum modification on spur gear back-side mesh stiffness and dynamics

Abstract This paper analytically investigates the relationship between the drive-side and back-side mesh stiffness for spur gear pairs with various addendum modifications. A time-varying asymmetric mesh stiffness model was built and employed in two typical gear dynamic models to simulate the effect of the addendum modification on gear dynamics. The results reveal that correlation of the back-side mesh stiffness with drive-side mesh stiffness is mainly affected by the tooth thickness at the pitch circle. Since tooth addendum modification directly determines the tooth thickness at the pitch circle, it significantly influences gear back-side tooth impact as it can alter the phase shift of the back-side mesh stiffness with regard to the drive-side mesh stiffness. Therefore, a precise time-varying asymmetric mesh stiffness model should be used to analyze gear dynamics when the gears are working under light load or idling conditions where back-side tooth impact is most likely to happen.

[1]  R. Cornell Compliance and Stress Sensitivity of Spur Gear Teeth , 1981 .

[2]  Wennian Yu,et al.  Analytical modeling of spur gear corner contact effects , 2016 .

[3]  Zaigang Chen,et al.  Mesh stiffness calculation of a spur gear pair with tooth profile modification and tooth root crack , 2013 .

[4]  Robert G. Parker,et al.  Analytical determination of back-side contact gear mesh stiffness , 2014 .

[5]  Luca Landi,et al.  Influence of the addendum modification on spur gear efficiency , 2012 .

[6]  I. Atanasovska,et al.  Influence of Addendum Modification Coefficient on the Gear’s Load Capacity , 2006 .

[7]  Philippe Velex,et al.  Contribution of Gear Body to Tooth Deflections—A New Bidimensional Analytical Formula , 2004 .

[8]  Teik C. Lim,et al.  Non-linear dynamic simulation of gear response under the idling condition , 2012 .

[9]  Yimin Shao,et al.  Dynamic simulation of spur gear with tooth root crack propagating along tooth width and crack depth , 2011 .

[10]  P. Velex,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE INFLUENCE OF SHAPE DEVIATIONS AND MOUNTING ERRORS ON GEAR DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR , 1996 .

[11]  Gitin M. Maitra,et al.  Handbook of Gear Design , 1994 .

[12]  Wennian Yu,et al.  The effects of spur gear tooth spatial crack propagation on gear mesh stiffness , 2015 .

[13]  A. Kahraman,et al.  Steady state forced response of a mechanical oscillator with combined parametric excitation and clearance type non-linearity , 1995 .

[14]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  Mesh stiffness evaluation of an internal spur gear pair with tooth profile shift , 2016 .

[15]  M. Divandari,et al.  Tooth Profile Modification and its Effect on Spur Gear Pair Vibration in Presence of Localized Tooth Defect , 2012 .

[16]  Rajendra Singh,et al.  Interactions between time-varying mesh stiffness and clearance non-linearities in a geared system , 1991 .

[17]  Teik C. Lim,et al.  Effect of tooth mesh stiffness asymmetric nonlinearity for drive and coast sides on hypoid gear dynamics , 2009 .

[18]  Gaël Chevallier,et al.  Gear impacts and idle gear noise: Experimental study and non-linear dynamic model , 2009 .

[19]  Wennian Yu,et al.  The dynamic coupling behaviour of a cylindrical geared rotor system subjected to gear eccentricities , 2017 .

[20]  Michael Yu Wang,et al.  Numerical Modelling and Analysis of Automotive Transmission Rattle , 2002 .