In vivo kinetics of transcription initiation of the lar promoter in Escherichia coli. Evidence for a sequential mechanism with two rate-limiting steps

BackgroundIn Escherichia coli the mean and cell-to-cell diversity in RNA numbers of different genes vary widely. This is likely due to different kinetics of transcription initiation, a complex process with multiple rate-limiting steps that affect RNA production.ResultsWe measured the in vivo kinetics of production of individual RNA molecules under the control of the lar promoter in E. coli. From the analysis of the distributions of intervals between transcription events in the regimes of weak and medium induction, we find that the process of transcription initiation of this promoter involves a sequential mechanism with two main rate-limiting steps, each lasting hundreds of seconds. Both steps become faster with increasing induction by IPTG and Arabinose.ConclusionsThe two rate-limiting steps in initiation are found to be important regulators of the dynamics of RNA production under the control of the lar promoter in the regimes of weak and medium induction. Variability in the intervals between consecutive RNA productions is much lower than if there was only one rate-limiting step with a duration following an exponential distribution. The methodology proposed here to analyze the in vivo dynamics of transcription may be applicable at a genome-wide scale and provide valuable insight into the dynamics of prokaryotic genetic networks.

[1]  W. McClure,et al.  Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. , 1985, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  Ido Golding,et al.  RNA dynamics in live Escherichia coli cells. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. West,et al.  Image segmentation and dynamic lineage analysis in single‐cell fluorescence microscopy , 2009, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[4]  H. Buc,et al.  Topological unwinding of strong and weak promoters by RNA polymerase. A comparison between the lac wild-type and the UV5 sites of Escherichia coli. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  M. Lewis,et al.  A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[6]  Robert Schleif,et al.  AraC protein, regulation of the l-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli, and the light switch mechanism of AraC action. , 2010, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[7]  X. Xie,et al.  Probing Gene Expression in Live Cells, One Protein Molecule at a Time , 2006, Science.

[8]  M. Thomas Record,et al.  RNA Polymerase-Promoter Interactions: the Comings and Goings of RNA Polymerase , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  J. Paulsson,et al.  Effects of Molecular Memory and Bursting on Fluctuations in Gene Expression , 2008, Science.

[10]  L. Hsu Monitoring abortive initiation. , 2009, Methods.

[11]  Antti Häkkinen,et al.  Effects of Transcriptional Pausing on Gene Expression Dynamics , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Antti Häkkinen,et al.  Effects of the promoter open complex formation on gene expression dynamics. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  S. Busby,et al.  The regulation of bacterial transcription initiation , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[14]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Stochastic switching in gene networks can occur by a single-molecule event or many molecular steps. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Henry Horng-Shing Lu,et al.  Segmentation of cDNA microarray images by kernel density estimation , 2008, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[17]  Rui Zhu,et al.  A General Modeling Strategy for Gene Regulatory Networks with Stochastic Dynamics , 2006, J. Comput. Biol..

[18]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.

[19]  R. Segev,et al.  GENERAL PROPERTIES OF THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL TIME-SERIES IN ESCHERICHIA COLI , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[20]  W Hendrickson,et al.  Regulation of the Escherichia coli L-arabinose operon studied by gel electrophoresis DNA binding assay. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  W. Suh,et al.  Roles of Mg2+ in the mechanism of formation and dissociation of open complexes between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lambda PR promoter: kinetic evidence for a second open complex requiring Mg2+. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[22]  Robert H. Singer,et al.  Single mRNA Molecules Demonstrate Probabilistic Movement in Living Mammalian Cells , 2003, Current Biology.

[23]  R. Landick The regulatory roles and mechanism of transcriptional pausing. , 2006, Biochemical Society transactions.

[24]  C. Daub,et al.  BMC Systems Biology , 2007 .

[25]  W. McClure,et al.  Kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter. Evidence for a sequential mechanism involving three steps. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[26]  H. Bujard,et al.  Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[28]  P. Dehaseth,et al.  Mechanism of bacterial transcription initiation: RNA polymerase - promoter binding, isomerization to initiation-competent open complexes, and initiation of RNA synthesis. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Arkady B. Khodursky,et al.  Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[31]  M. Chamberlin,et al.  Basic mechanisms of transcript elongation and its regulation. , 1997, Annual review of biochemistry.

[32]  K. Matthews,et al.  Combinatorial Mutations of lac Repressor , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  H. Bujard,et al.  Dissecting the functional program of Escherichia coli promoters: the combined mode of action of Lac repressor and AraC activator. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.