Refractive and visual outcomes after Ferrara corneal ring segment implantation at a 60% depth in keratoconic eyes: case series.

PURPOSE This report addresses refractive, topographic, visual acuity, and optical coherence tomography outcomes 12 months after femtosecond, laser-assisted insertion of Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconic eyes at a depth of 60%. METHODS Interventional, prospective, non-comparative case series. We performed femtosecond, laser-assisted insertion of Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments in 15 keratoconic eyes. We included patients with documented keratoconus who voluntarily signed informed consents if they had best spectacle-corrected visual acuity ≥0.30 logMAR and corneal thickness ≥400 μm. We excluded patients with previous ocular surgery or corneal curvatures >65 diopters (D). Our main outcome measures were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and corneal topographic parameters (flattest, steepest and average keratometry [K]), evaluated at baseline and at 1-,3-,6-, and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS The mean ± standard deviation baseline uncorrected visual acuity and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were 1.03 ± 0.46 and 0.42 ± 0.13, respectively; the 12-month mean standard deviation uncorrected visual acuity and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were 0.72 ± 0.37 and 0.31 ± 0.16, respectively, without significant differences (p=0.05 for both). The mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improvements were statistically significant after 3- (p=0.02) and after 6-months (p=0.02). The mean baseline flattest (K1), steepest (K2), and overall keratometries (mean power) were 48.35 ± 3.65 D, 53.67 ± 3.38 D, and 50.84 ± 3.36 D, respectively. The 12-month mean ± standard deviations for flattest-K1, steepest-K2, and overall K were 46.53 ± 3.70 D, 49.83 ± 3.50 D, and 48.12 ± 3.49 D respectively, with statistically significant differences for all three topographic parameters (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segment insertions at a depth of 60% yield satisfactory visual, refractive, and keratometric results in keratoconic eyes.

[1]  H. Hashemi,et al.  Intracorneal ring segment depth in keratoconus patients: a long-term follow-up study , 2018, International Ophthalmology.

[2]  Leonardo Torquetti,et al.  Tomographic Findings After Implantation of Ferrara Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus. , 2017, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  J. Alfonso,et al.  Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in 409 Paracentral Keratoconic Eyes , 2016, Cornea.

[4]  J. Merayo-Lloves,et al.  Evaluation of anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in keratoconus patients implanted with intrastromal corneal ring segments. , 2016, International journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  A. Barbara,et al.  Depth evaluation of intended vs actual intacs intrastromal ring segments using optical coherence tomography , 2016, Eye.

[6]  J. Alió,et al.  Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments: How Successful is the Surgical Treatment of Keratoconus? , 2014, Middle East African journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Kheirkhah,et al.  Efficacy of Intacs Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Relative to Depth of Insertion Evaluated with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography , 2013, Middle East African journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  H. Jabaly-Habib,et al.  Depth of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments by OCT , 2013, European journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Leonardo Torquetti,et al.  Intrastromal corneal ring segments: visual outcomes from a large case series , 2012, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[10]  Almutez M. Gharaibeh,et al.  Ferrara ring segments implantation for treating keratoconus. , 2012, International journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  I. Hamdi.  Optical and topographic changes in keratoconus after implantation of Ferrara intracorneal ring segments. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[12]  G. Di Meglio,et al.  Treatment of Keratoconus with Ferrara ICRS and Consideration of the Efficacy of the Ferrara Nomogram in a 5-Year Follow-Up , 2010, European journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  James S Wolffsohn,et al.  Keratoconus: a review. , 2010, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[14]  Y. Rabinowitz.  INTACS for Keratoconus , 2006, International ophthalmology clinics.

[15]  Leonardo Torquetti,et al.  Long‐term follow‐up of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  M. Jankov,et al.  One-year results of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation (KeraRing) using femtosecond laser in patients with keratoconus. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Sedaghat,et al.  FERRARA INTRACORNEAL RING SEGMENTS FOR KERATOCONUS , 2005 .

[18]  D. Miranda,et al.  Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments for severe keratoconus. , 2003, Journal of refractive surgery.

[19]  Paulo Ferrara,et al.  Ferrara intrastromal corneal rings for the correction of keratoconus , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  J Colin,et al.  Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings. , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  J. Krumeich,et al.  Live‐epikeratophakia for keratoconus , 1998, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  R. Belfort Junior,et al.  Intrastromal corneal ring--one-year results of first implants in humans: a preliminary nonfunctional eye study. , 1993, Refractive & corneal surgery.