Defining Success in Infant Penetrating Keratoplasty for Developmental Corneal Opacities

Background and Purpose Neonatal corneal opacities (NCO) are one of the common causes of visual impairment in infants. We present the two infants with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for unilateral NCO with different visual and graft outcomes, and illustrate the importance of timing of surgery, importance of visual rehabilitation, and the lack of necessity of a clear graft to achieve reasonable visual function in infants with NCO. Patients and Methods Two infants with unilateral NCO (Peters anomaly) underwent PKP at age of 5.5 weeks (Case One) and 16 weeks (Case Two). Postoperative optical correction, amblyopia therapy, visual and graft outcomes were recorded. Results At the last follow-up (9.5 years in both the cases), Case One achieved a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/80 with −22 D of contact lens. The graft had a small clear zone centrally but otherwise was opacified to some extent. Case Two achieved a BCVA of 20/125 at 30 cms eccentrically with a clear graft. Case Two was uncooperative for amblyopia therapy and optical treatment. Conclusion For a successful visual outcome in NCO, early PKP, aggressive amblyopia therapy, optical correction, and commitment from the parents for long-term follow-up and demanding treatment are required.

[1]  Seong-Joon Kim,et al.  Long-term visual outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty for Peters anomaly , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[2]  K. Nischal A new approach to the classification of neonatal corneal opacities , 2012, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[3]  C. Basdekidou,et al.  Should Unilateral Congenital Corneal Opacities in Peters’ Anomaly be Grafted? , 2011, European journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Long-term visual outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in infants and children with Peters anomaly. , 2009, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[5]  T. Dada,et al.  Pediatric keratoplasty. , 2009, Survey of ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Krishnaiah,et al.  Outcome of Penetrating Keratoplasty for Peters Anomaly , 2008, Cornea.

[7]  G. Zaidman,et al.  Long-term visual prognosis in children after corneal transplant surgery for Peters anomaly type I. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  P. M. S. M. F. Frcpch,et al.  Visual impairment in infancy: impact on neurodevelopmental and neurobiological processes , 2007 .

[9]  Peter T. Huang Penetrating keratoplasty in infants and children. , 2007, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[10]  C. Summers,et al.  Strabismus and amblyopia in bilateral Peters anomaly. , 2006, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[11]  D. Rootman,et al.  Corneal transplants for the treatment of congenital corneal opacities. , 2005, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[12]  E. Cohen,et al.  Congenital Corneal Opacities in a Cornea Referral Practice , 2004, Cornea.

[13]  J. Grigg,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in children: visual and graft outcome , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  N. Dale,et al.  Visual impairment in infancy: impact on neurodevelopmental and neurobiological processes. , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[15]  J. Naor,et al.  Clinicopathological correlation of congenital corneal opacification using ultrasound biomicroscopy , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  M. O'Keefe,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in infants. , 2001, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[17]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Long-term results of corneal graft survival in infants and children with peters anomaly. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[18]  S. I. Brown,et al.  Transplantation of congenitally opaque corneas , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  R. Dana,et al.  Corneal Transplantation in Children with Peters Anomaly and Mesenchymal Dysgeneses , 1997 .

[20]  D. Schaumberg,et al.  Corneal transplantation in children with Peters anomaly and mesenchymal dysgenesis. Multicenter Pediatric Keratoplasty Study. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[21]  D. Stager,et al.  The critical period for surgical treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  E. Traboulsi,et al.  Visual outcome after surgery for Peters' anomaly. , 1994, Ophthalmic genetics.

[23]  J. Cameron Good visual result following early penetrating keratoplasty for Peters' anomaly. , 1993, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[24]  J. Rowsey,et al.  Peters' anomaly: a review of 26 penetrating keratoplasties in infants. , 1993, Ophthalmic surgery.

[25]  M. Gresty,et al.  Neurology of latent nystagmus. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  C. Timms,et al.  Clinical evidence for the onset of the sensitive period in infancy. , 1992, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in children. , 1984, Ophthalmology.

[28]  S. I. Brown,et al.  Transplantation of congenitally opaque corneas. , 1980, Ophthalmology.