Understanding Online Voluntary Self-Exclusion in Gambling: An Empirical Study Using Account-Based Behavioral Tracking Data

Online gambling has continued to grow alongside new ways to analyze data using behavioral tracking as a way to enhance consumer protection. A number of studies have analyzed consumers that have used voluntary self-exclusion (VSE) as a proxy measure for problem gambling. However, some scholars have argued that this is a poor proxy for problem gambling. Therefore, the present study examined this issue by analyzing customers (from the gambling operator Unibet) that have engaged in VSE. The participants comprised of costumers that chose to use the six-month VSE option (n = 7732), and customers that chose to close their Unibet account due to a specific self-reported gambling addiction (n = 141). Almost one-fifth of the customers that used six-month VSE only had gambling activity for less than 24 h (19.15%). Moreover, half of the customers had less than seven days of account registration prior to six-month VSE (50.39%). Customers who use VSE are too different to be treated as a homogenous group and therefore VSE is not a reliable proxy measure for problem gambling. The findings of this research are beneficial for operators, researchers, and policymakers because it provides insight into gambling behavior by analyzing real player behavior using tracking technologies, which is objective and unbiased.

[1]  D. GriffithsMark,et al.  Analyzing Consumer Protection for Gamblers Across Different Online Gambling Operators: A Descriptive Study , 2017 .

[2]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Should voluntary “self exclusion” by gamblers be used as a proxy measure for problem gambling? , 2016 .

[3]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Self-Reported Losses Versus Actual Losses in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study , 2016, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[4]  M. Griffiths,et al.  A Critical Review of the Harm-Minimisation Tools Available for Electronic Gambling , 2016, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[5]  S. Dragicevic,et al.  Predicting online gambling self-exclusion: an analysis of the performance of supervised machine learning models , 2016 .

[6]  J. Haeusler,et al.  Follow the money: using payment behaviour as predictor for future self-exclusion , 2016 .

[7]  Matthew Rockloff,et al.  Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[8]  Richard T. A. Wood,et al.  Understanding Positive Play: An Exploration of Playing Experiences and Responsible Gambling Practices , 2015, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[9]  S. Raisamo,et al.  The extent and distribution of gambling harm in Finland as assessed by the Problem Gambling Severity Index. , 2015, European journal of public health.

[10]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  How risky is Internet gambling? A comparison of subgroups of Internet gamblers based on problem gambling status , 2015, New Media Soc..

[11]  J. Parke,et al.  A Descriptive Analysis of Demographic and Behavioral Data from Internet Gamblers and Those Who Self-exclude from Online Gambling Platforms , 2015, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[12]  J. Haeusler,et al.  Communications-based early detection of gambling-related problems in online gambling , 2015 .

[13]  M. Griffiths,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity , 2014, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[14]  Terri-Lynn MacKay,et al.  Online gambling participation and problem gambling severity: is there a causal relationship? , 2014 .

[15]  Richard T. A. Wood,et al.  Rating the Suitability of Responsible Gambling Features for Specific Game Types: A Resource for Optimizing Responsible Gambling Strategy , 2014, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[16]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Voluntary Limit Setting and Player Choice in Most Intense Online Gamblers: An Empirical Study of Gambling Behaviour , 2013, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[17]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Behavioral Tracking Tools, Regulation, and Corporate Social Responsibility in Online Gambling , 2013 .

[18]  Alberto Boschetti,et al.  Markers of unsustainable gambling for early detection of at-risk online gamblers , 2013 .

[19]  Debi A. LaPlante,et al.  Behavioral characteristics of Internet gamblers who trigger corporate responsible gambling interventions. , 2012, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[20]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity: A Simulation Study , 2012 .

[21]  H. Shaffer,et al.  How do gamblers start gambling: identifying behavioural markers for high-risk internet gambling. , 2012, European journal of public health.

[22]  Joerg Haefeli,et al.  Early detection items and responsible gambling features for online gambling , 2011 .

[23]  R. Volberg,et al.  Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: evidence from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010 , 2011 .

[24]  S. Dragicevic,et al.  Analysis of casino online gambling data in relation to behavioural risk markers for high-risk gambling and player protection , 2011 .

[25]  Sally M. Gainsbury,et al.  Player account-based gambling: potentials for behaviour-based research methodologies , 2011 .

[26]  G. Meyer,et al.  Internet Self-Exclusion: Characteristics of Self-Excluded Gamblers and Preliminary Evidence for Its Effectiveness , 2011, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[27]  Richard A. LaBrie,et al.  Identifying behavioral markers of disordered Internet sports gambling , 2011 .

[28]  Margaret B. Devaney,et al.  Online gambling and international regulation: an outside bet , 2009 .

[29]  Bob Erens,et al.  Sociodemographic Correlates of Internet Gambling: Findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  David Hillier,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in the UK gambling industry , 2009 .

[31]  H. Shaffer,et al.  How Do Gamblers End Gambling: Longitudinal Analysis of Internet Gambling Behaviors Prior to Account Closure Due to Gambling Related Problems , 2009, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[32]  R. Ladouceur,et al.  Improved Self-exclusion Program: Preliminary Results , 2008, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[33]  Debi A. LaPlante,et al.  Population trends in Internet sports gambling , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Internet Gambling: An Online Empirical Study Among Student Gamblers , 2008, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[35]  Debi A. LaPlante,et al.  Assessing the Playing Field: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Internet Sports Gambling Behavior , 2007, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[36]  MICHAEL SMEATON,et al.  Internet Gambling and Social Responsibility: An Exploratory Study , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Internet Gambling: Issues, Concerns, and Recommendations , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[38]  L. Clark,et al.  Applying Data Science to Behavioural Analysis of Online Gambling , 2019 .

[39]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Extending the RENO model: Clinical and ethical applications. , 2016, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[40]  Katherine A. Lovejoy A Busted Flush: Regulation of Online Gambling in the European Union , 2014 .

[41]  M. Griffiths,et al.  A Scoping Study of the Structural and Situational Characteristics of Internet Gambling , 2013, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[42]  Griffiths,et al.  Online behavioural tracking in Internet gambling research: ethical and methodological issues , 2010 .

[43]  Griffiths The implications of real-time behavioural tracking , 2009 .

[44]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  A Science-Based Framework for Responsible Gambling: The Reno Model , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[45]  I. Giroux,et al.  Brief Communications Analysis of a Casino's Self-Exclusion Program , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.