Diurnal and position‐induced variability of impedance cardiography measurements in healthy subjects

Cardiovascular (CV) parameters and their measurements are subject to variation. In this study, we evaluated the reproducibility of impedance cardiography (ICG) measurements following orthostatic and diurnal challenges for a set of 22 CV parameters in ten randomly selected healthy nonpregnant women. A standard protocol was used to record a consecutive series of measurements for each parameter before and after three position changes. This series of measurements was performed twice (AM and PM sessions). For each parameter, measurement‐shift following position change was evaluated at 5% cutoff and compared between sessions. Intra‐ and intersession intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated for individual measurements per position using repeated‐measures analysis of variance. Intra‐ and intersession Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) was calculated for mean values per position. Intersession correlation for measurement‐shift following position change was 0·42 (5/12) for pressure parameters, whereas this was 0·96 (52/54) for other parameters. Inter‐ and intrasession ICC for individual measurements varied between 0·02 and 1 for all parameters, however inter‐ and intrasession PCC for mean values was consistently >0·80 for stroke volume (SV), stroke index (SI), cardiac output (CO), acceleration and velocity index (ACI and VI), thoracic fluid content (TFC), TFC index (TFCI) and heart period duration (HPD). We conclude that in healthy subjects under standardised conditions, reproducibility of means of multiple ICG measurements is high for SV, SI, CO, ACI, VI, TFC, TFCI and HPD. From our data, we cannot draw conclusions on trends in diseased subjects.

[1]  F. Fuchs,et al.  Diurnal variation of vascular diameter and reactivity in healthy young men. , 2008, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[2]  Michael J Joyner,et al.  Cardiovascular dynamics in healthy subjects with differing heart rate responses to tilt , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  W. Buhre,et al.  Assessment of stroke volumeindex with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[4]  H. Tran,et al.  Blood pressure and blood flow variation during postural change from sitting to standing: model development and validation. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  S. Palta,et al.  New diagnostic modalities in the diagnosis of heart failure. , 2004, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[6]  N. Albert,et al.  Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure. , 2004, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[7]  Zvi Vered,et al.  Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance. , 2004, Chest.

[8]  T. Yambe,et al.  Validity of the adaptive filter for accurate measurement of cardiac output in impedance cardiography. , 2004, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  D. Hett,et al.  Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring. , 2003, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[10]  R. Vogel,et al.  Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? , 2003, Chest.

[11]  M. Drazner,et al.  Comparison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  I. Wright,et al.  Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. , 2001, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[13]  A. Dart,et al.  Diurnal Variation in Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation Is Not Apparent in Coronary Artery Disease , 2001, Circulation.

[14]  J E Schwartz,et al.  Ambulatory physical activity as a determinant of diurnal blood pressure variation. , 1999, Hypertension.

[15]  P. Vries,et al.  The technique of impedance cardiography. , 1997, European heart journal.

[16]  van der Spoel,et al.  Standardization of non-invasive impedance cardiography for assessment of stroke volume: comparison with thermodilution. , 1996, British journal of anaesthesia.

[17]  S. Thomas,et al.  Impedance cardiography using the Sramek-Bernstein method: accuracy and variability at rest and during exercise. , 1992, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[18]  D. DuBois,et al.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known , 1989 .

[19]  D W Kim,et al.  Detection of physiological events by impedance. , 1989, Yonsei medical journal.

[20]  B. Hockings,et al.  Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output , 1986, Critical care medicine.

[21]  D. Spodick,et al.  Heart rate--left ventricular ejection time relations. Variations during postural change and cardiovascular challenges. , 1976, British heart journal.

[22]  D. Spodick,et al.  Comparative responses to orthostatic stress in normal and abnormal subjects. Evaluation by impedance cardiography. , 1974, Chest.

[23]  R. Patterson,et al.  Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. , 1966, Aerospace medicine.

[24]  J. Tuckman,et al.  Effect of different degrees of tilt on cardiac output, heart rate, and blood pressure in normal man. , 1966, British heart journal.

[25]  J. Leonard,et al.  Effects of posture and atropine on the cardiac output. , 1957, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[26]  D. D. Bois,et al.  CLINICAL CALORIMETRY: TENTH PAPER A FORMULA TO ESTIMATE THE APPROXIMATE SURFACE AREA IF HEIGHT AND WEIGHT BE KNOWN , 1916 .

[27]  G. Gravlee Assessment of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution , 2009 .

[28]  L. Mathews,et al.  Cardiac output monitoring. , 2008, Annals of cardiac anaesthesia.

[29]  Andrzej Kutarski,et al.  Impedance cardiography: A valuable method of evaluating haemodynamic parameters. , 2007, Cardiology journal.

[30]  Nigel G Shrive,et al.  Systemic venous circulation. Waves propagating on a windkessel: relation of arterial and venous windkessels to systemic vascular resistance. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[31]  Milo Engoren,et al.  Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. , 2005, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.